.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

Sunday, July 11, 2010

Gold Spike...Security Guard confirms tourists in jeans not welcome! Half-drunk rep establishes discrimination!







Hotel turns guests away in wrinkled, raunchy, soiled jeans!
(all the rage)





Earlier this evening, I reported on a shocking incident which went down at the Gold Spike, which still boggles my mind.

After witnessing the events, and mulling them over, it was quite obvious to me that a paid-up hotel guest was shaken-down by a demented Security Guard, who openly discriminated on the basis of "appearance".

Post: 07/10/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/07/gold-spikeimpotent-security-guard-brian.html

When the guest complained to a supervisor that he was harassed by a snotty security guard - who thought the guest - "did not belong there" - the guard who committed the offense (and his supervisor) swore-up-and-down that was not the case.

But, as the old truism goes, if you're going to tell lies - you'd better keep track of them - or they'll return and bite you big-time in the a** later.

For example, the head of security - who smelled like a brewery, by the way - made the following comment which contradicted the prior stance taken by the Hotel supervisor (Rolando), Officer Brian Wills, and staff in the regular employ of the Vegas joint.

"Management does not want guests in soiled-looking  (used?) clothing. Like jeans."

Golly, this man must have gone balmy in the sun.

Imagine that!

The Management at a low-class renovated Hotel - that daily begs to find smucks to rent its rooms through Expedia, Orbitz, and Priceline - is actually under the wild delusion that folks who pay discount room rates for $20.00 (plus taxes) are going to show up in Gianni Versace, Ermenegildo Zegna, and Tom Ford?

Clueless Idiots!

Frankly, my darlings, the dregs I spied at the spike (staff included except for Tara), amounted to a posse of white trailer trash (including the chief honcho presiding over the over-the-hill-gang they have the nerve to refer to as a security detail).

In fact, your eyes would have popped out of your head, if you caught sight of the holier-than-thou security chief  plopping his dirty running shoes down on the Hotel Desk countertop.

Was he born in a barn, or what?

Then, there is the question of his lies.

As I have often quipped on appropriate occasions, a synonym for Police Officer (Security guards, too) is Professional liar.

For instance, when some things disappeared from the guest's room later (lifted, curiously enough, during a brief window of opportunity that presented itself when the victim was out of his room for a brief time at the front desk) the upset lodger noted that it was kind-of an odd coincidence that shortly after the Officer demanded his room number personal effects went missing.

In response, the security chief snapped that he asked the guard to check the room number, which was a bold-face effort to get his employee off the hook.

But, when the guest asked if he made that request before or after the guard first approached the mistreated hotel guest, he hesitated.

Gotcha!

That was a crucial bit of evidence that would seal his fate!

Instead of responding with a truthful answer - he tried to evade the question - to avoid recrimination.

For instance, he half-assed muttered, that he had his eye on the guest earlier and specifically asked for a confirmation he was booked into the Hotel.

However, that was a bold-faced lie!

When the guest approached the bar earlier in the afternoon - the head guard turned - and noticed the individual for the first time.

The security guard, who had already obtained the room number earlier when the guest was unjustly barred from the pool area originally, pointed out at this juncture - not the other - that the interloper was a paid guest at the Hotel.

After reflecting on a few of the issues - and in view of the fact the chief security guard was holding court in the pool area - it appears that is the crux of it.

The head of security was using the Hotel facilities for his own social purposes and trying to keep out paying guests who were entitled to have access according to the terms and conditions of their room rental agreements.

I surmise that is why the ugly incident went down, and persisted with great earnest, in the aftermath.

I also have an inkling (my readers have been privy to my psychic capabilities in the past) that there is something dishonest - possibly illegal going on at this Hotel - and that unexpected visitors like the guest in question are an intrusion that pose a potential threat to their nefarious shadowy affairs yet to be determined.

Intriguing!



Notorious Spike has pretensions of competing with Encore!

No comments:

Post a Comment