.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

Saturday, May 31, 2008

George Michael...the Los Angeles tour! Wham! Bang! Thank you ma'am...

George Michael cruises the loo...


One morning a radio station was chatting with a call-in listener who lucked out and won tickets for a George Michael concert.

"How long have you been a fan?" the high-energy disc jockey asked with infectious enthusiasm.

"Oh, since George was whamming."

Ha! That conjured up curious images - and memories - as well.

Like, how about, "Wham Bam, thank you Ma'am?"

Yes, I know, that was a lyric from a David Bowie song.

I was referring to his private life, if you get the gist of my meaning!

I laughed to myself when I recalled the incident a few years ago when Mr. Michael (an oddity of terms, isn't it?) got caught with his - um - pants down in a men's rest room across the street from the prestigious Beverly Hills Hotel.

I thought it was admirable that George fessed up - quick as a wink - without any long drawn-out excuses.

But, with a top-notch lawyer he could have gotten off - so to speak - in my estimation.

Think about it.

Allegedly, he was standing at the urinal stroking his Johnson - no, not "Don Johnson" - his co**, peck** - whatever.

Without warning (gosh - the unexpected surprise could have sent him off half-co**ed - don't 'ya think?) an undercover agent apparently strolled in and spied the pop star in the act of - er - exposing himself in a crude intimate manner.

Or, however you want to posture it.

But, there weren't any other witnesses to shake a stick at.

Essentially, it was George Michael's word against that of the undercover dick (there's something erotic - yet foreboding-sounding - about that term, isn't there?) who proceeded to frisk him (betcha he was turned on by that) and haul his tight little a** to the slammer.

If you recall, straight off, George pleaded no contest.

Like the Michael Jackson scenario, was it possible that there was something so distinctive about his pen**, that he was sure the copper could identify it in open court, if necessary?

Is that why he begged off?

Personally, I figure that a high-powered attorney with some street smarts under his belt, could have put forth a compelling argument that George wasn't actually "playing" with his organ at all (yeah, all the innuendos are hilarious in this scenario) but - rather - shaking it a tad to cast off a few last dew drops of pi** from the end of it.

Ladies, it's a guy thing!

Ah, maybe that's it.

He didn't want to air his dirty underwear - um - laundry in public!

Remember what Oscar Wilde once said,

"Scandal is gossip made tedious by morality"

Friday, May 30, 2008

Billy Crystal...attended panel discussion on "Gay" contributions to TV. Bruce Vilanch hosted!

Bruce Vilanch was in top form last night at a panel discussion on behalf of the TV Academy - celebrating Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender contributions to the medium - both in front of and behind the camera.

As the President and CEO of the prestigious TV Academy noted, recognition "has been long overdue."

And, there were a number of treats in store for the rapt audience.

For example, there were guest appearances by Tracy Scoggins (Babylon 5), Ant (Last Comic Standing), Amanda Bearse (Married with Children), and David Alan Grant (30 Something).

Billy Crystal wowed the packed house when he sauntered out and fondly reminisced about - "SOAP" - a ground-breaking comedy show in the 70's in which he played one of the first major gay characters on the little boob tube when depictions of that sort were not in vogue.

The delightful star surprised fans when he noted for the record that - at first - he was reticent about taking on the colorful role about a fey young man who gets his jollies dressing up in his Mother's clothes

"Originally, there was just one scripted line, but by the third episode, the character had been fully-fleshed out on the show."

Believe it or not, the celebrated funnyman got more flack from his family, when the send-up first broadcast on Network TV.

"You're playing a fagala?"

In fact, when he signed on the dotted line, it never crossed his mind negative reactions might surface outside the studio, as well.

For instance, he laughingly recalled strolling down New York Streets, taken aback a bit when construction workers and cabbies pointed out the oddity.

"Heh, there's that "gay guy" from that wacky TV show, Soap.

And, during the weekly tapings before a live audience, nervous giggles often burst out from behind the footlights when the subject of intimacy with a male love interest was broached, he noted with some disdain.

But - within a couple of seasons (perhaps due to the charm and wit of the character and Crystal's ability to inhabit a role so convincingly) middle America had not only warmed up to the cross-dresser - but was rooting for him in a child custody battle in what amounted to a "controversial" first for the staid conservative medium.

In fact, that message tended to be the theme of the evening's dialogue.

Gosh, look how far "gay" characters have come since those pioneer moments of yesteryear when depictions of homosexuals were either awkward, stereotypical, or downright clueless!

For example, a clip from the "Golden Girls" threw the spotlight on Estelle Getty's character when she innocently conjectured that Danny Thomas was "gay".

The studio audience went into hysterics for a moment or two.

Tthen, her daughter (played by Bea Arthur) pointed out that Mr. Thomas was actually "Lebanese", not Lesbian.

Cheap shots?

David Alan Grant - who was a regular on "30 Something" in its heyday - joked about the mood around the set the day the first screen kiss between two male characters was going to be taped for broadcast on a mainstream Network TV Show.

"It was like the set was radioactive."

In anticipation of the stupendous moment - all the crew guys and staffers swaggered about the set acting nonchalant and "butch-like" with a kind-of "just doing my job" attitude about 'em - that thickly permeated one end of the stage to the other.

Who me, a fag? No way, Jose.

The soft-spoken likable Grant confessed that he was in the closet for years, and afraid to "come out", for fear he might lose work. Ironically, the first job he was offered was - you got it - to play a gay character.

In the hit Broadway production - "Bent" - Grant ended up playing opposite charismatic Richard Gere.

Bruce Vilanch - a top comedy writer known for his hilarious guest appearances on Hollywood Squares - recalled his early days in Hollywood, too.

Drawing from his own life experiences in New York - he conjured up what he thought was a "novel idea" at the time - a side-splitting sitcom about a straight woman and a gay male who become room-mates.

"I pictured Sandy Duncan and Tommy Tune in the roles."

The audience roared!

The network execs were more harsh in their assessment.

"Whatever were you thinking?"

Twenty years later "Will & Grace" (similarly-themed bill-of-fare) became a big hit with American audiences on prime-time television.

Perhaps, it was all about timing.

Or, maybe by a fluke of fate, there had just been a fortuitous turn in consciousness down a rainbow alley somewhere along the way.

Essentially, that was part of the message from the panel.

The TV Academy was giving a nod (and openly acknowledging) that because of the deliberate exemplary efforts of a handful of insightful pioneer gay writers and actors, characters of diverse sexuality have become part 'n parcel of the American landscape in recent years in high-profile projects.

In some cases, great strides had even been made in glaring controversial ways.

In respect to, "Queer as Folk", for example.

Curiously, with "Queer", there was a bit of a novel reversal.

A predominate number of the characters - not just a couple - were openly gay and screaming proud of it!

In that instant case, it was a bit of a tough row to hoe.

Undoubtedly, Hollywood's "gay mafia" - ever-focused on transmitting positive images of the gay community into the mainstream consciousness - would have preferred to have toned down the explosion of graphic images depicting a promiscuous lifestyle they found injurious to the cause.

But, the intimate tales that unfolded around those story lines, cried out to be told.

And, when the demographics were plumbed, a number of eyebrows were raised.

The research revealed that the longevity of the titillating pot-boiler was due - in large part - to a straight female viewership around the country.

When the question was posed as to why that sector tuned in, the responses were not only surprising, but downright insightful.

Bruce Vilanch chortled, "Straight women love to watch gay porn."

Another female panelist offered up her opinion based on conversations she'd engaged in with a cross-section of fans of the cable offering in the recent past.

"I talked to some straight women. And, they said they watched "Queer" because it gave them a glimpse into the male psyche and a rare opportunity to fathom an emotional side of men not found elsewhere on television."

That revelation elicited quite a reaction from audience members who chatted for a moment or two amongst themselves excitedly.

When there was a lull, the guest concluded,

"After all, society dictates that men are supposed to be real macho and conceal their feelings."

"DL Chronicles" - another gay-themed showed represented at the forum - figured differently into the scenarios discussed.

The drama focuses on a handful of Afro-American gay men exploring their sexuality on the "down low", for fear of retribution from an unrelenting anti-gay black community.

While the white actors, writers, and execs proudly asserted TV was definitely "out"- and that there had been a lot of progress in gaining favor with the American public in recent years - the two creators of the "Chronicles" (male lovers) were conflicted.

In essence, they were being forced to tip-toe around a "mine field", because of a double-whammy.

"There a lot of negative images of blacks right now in America, in addition to the negative ones associated with gays. So, it's tough for us because we have to try to responsibly deal with the two issues in a way that the black community will warm up to."

The African American community - unlike their Caucasian counterpart - still grapples with the homosexual "thing" apparently and has trouble accepting it.

Subsequently, the creators complained they continually feel the heat.

For them, there has been a lot of pressure because of an all-encompassing need to satisfy a demanding community, who defiantly want it "their way".

"At times, I just want to say "fu** it."

In fact, initially, they hid their sexual preferences from even close friends and relatives; indeed, they never intimated the nature of their close "relationship".

Whenever relatives came to visit, for example, a half of the two-some would move into the guest room and take on the role of "room-mate" temporarily during the stay.

Yes, a real charade was going down for the sake of appearances.

"Black gays take on a lot of flack, too. Because of being on the down-low, we are accused of spreading A.I.D.S. and that sort-of-thing."

In spite of the dilemmas faced, each tried to come out; in baby steps, mind you.

The one actor who hails from Chicago - jokingly noted that he finally broke down and informed his Mother about his deep dark secret - thinking that it would be safe.

Later, however, he learned she told everyone in Chicago about his sexual preference.

Imagine that, being outed by your own Mother!

Now, there's a tale for Oprah.

Near the tail end of the insightful forum there was a bit of focus on transgender issues, as well.

A couple of well-known personalities (Candis Cayne, for one ) who are actively being cast in roles - as extensions of themselves - poignantly recalled that when they were growing up and stumbling about in search of their sexual identities, there were few role models available to mold themselves after.

In fact - whenever they channel-surfed - the images society projected didn't jive or fit at all. So, they were forced to blaze their own trails, be their own role models, and fend for themselves.

Although "transgenders" per se are garnering respect in the industry, and landing plum gay-related roles in the duration, things could be better.

"Why not cast a gay man for a straight role. And a transgender woman a female role?" one panelist wondered aloud.

As the retrospective musings panned out near the end of the thought-provoking two-hour discussion, it was evident that far-reaching in-roads have been made in recent years.

In spite of the fact the big four networks (ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox) dominate - I expect the fledgling efforts of Logo TV (gay cable) - may give rise to another prominent force on the airwaves.

The emergence of the LGBT Network!

Who knows, maybe Ted Turner will flick on the switch!

Actually - producers like Norman Lear, Aaron Spelling, and Witt-Thomas - were applauded by the panelists for introducing gay characters into major story lines over the past couple of decades which have impacted the terrain greatly.

One exec noted:

"You don't have to be a visionary. Just know there is a need or an interest."

In spite of the fact - Lear, Spelling and Witt-Thomas maneuvered from a straight perspective - they endeavoured to enlighten the masses about gay issues and succeeded.

One of the first sponsors on Logo TV, funnily enough, was a vaginal infection cream.

Today, the gay-themed cable network boasts prestigious sponsors in the big advertising arena who are unflinching in their support, in spite of high-pressure tactics from anti-gay organizations and religious fundamentalists.

Although a handful of gay-themed shows are wrapping up this season - and likewise being bundled up for syndication heaven ("The L Shaped Room" and "Queer as Folk") - industry professionals noted there is no cause for alarm because the mainstream is now populated with a host of gay characters woven into the natural fabric of society.

And, what a rich tapestry that has become.

Stuck...tale ripped from headlines disturbs filmgoers!


Obviously, it was an important screening for the producers of "Stuck".

All the executives turned out for a sneak preview with the leading actors in tow - Mena Suvari & Russell Hornsby - who jetted in from far-off locales to attend.

A virgin to the U.S. Market, "Stuck" screened at the Toronto Film Festival recently to enthusiastic audiences.

Yeah, a big push for a release stateside proved successful. Today, the gory horror feature opens at the Nuart in Los Angeles and selected theatres across the country.

Frankly, I can't recall when I've attended a preview where the audience reacted so violently - moaned, cried out - were emotionally wrought over the events unfolding on the silver screen.

"Stuck" is raw and gritty and potent filmmaking; partly because of the special effects - which are damning, they're so realistic - and also due to the remarkable convincing performance by Stephen Rea in the lead role.

When the invite arrived for the sneak preview, I nearly passed.

"Stuck"...what kind of title was this for a movie?

At the theatre, filmgoers in-the-know noted that the project was based on a true story ripped from the headlines.

A young woman, on her way home from a bout of frenzied late-night partying, gets distracted on her cell phone. In a split second, suddenly - without warning - a homeless man steps in front of the oncoming car.

She slams into him.

The hapless character (played by Rea) unceremoniously gets "stuck" in the windshield of her vehicle. In shock - and distraught over the accident (and probably confused by virtue of the mind-altering drugs in her system) - she is at a loss to fathom the appropriate action to take.

So, she speeds home with the man dangling out the splintered window - parks the car in the garage - then dashes in the house to figure a way out of her dilemma.

At this juncture, it's important to note that at the crawl of the credits, producers stated that the film was "inspired by a true story"; herein, lies one cue.

There will be a departure from the original tale.

For me, the other hint at what was to unfold was obvious due to a remark the producer made before the curtain fell.

With a bit of glee, he noted that Amicus - the Indy Horror-Genre Film House - was distributing the thriller. Clearly, this was not going to be a sensitive morality tale with a cozy ending!

Indeed, it wasn't...

In fact, "Stuck" is definitely not for the squeamish!

In one scene, when Rea desperately writhes forward to snatch up a cell phone just beyond his reach, he is forced to drag his mutilated body over jagged pieces of glass and metal. Along the painful journey, the audience is treated to images of the slicing and dicing of flesh and disturbing images of blood spurting from the gaping wounds.

We feel his pain, his anguish...

In another shocking scene, I hid my face in my hands - occasionally peering through clenched fingers - waiting for closure. When it wasn't forthcoming, I asked the guest next to me to signal me when the traumatic violent stabbings came to a close.

Although the dialogue was often appropriate, due to some clever juxtaposition of images (which often caused a riveting upsurge of tangled emotions and feelings), the utterances jarred the sensibilities. One minute the filmgoer is forced to laugh maniacally, the next recoil in genuine horror.

Yeah, "Stuck" is a real roller-coaster ride!

The ending, well - it's a smash-up surprise.

This film is going to cause a lot of buzz because it's shocking and disturbing and pulls no punches.

"Stuck"...will make you come unglued!

Thursday, May 29, 2008

Hillary Clinton...Florida sheds light on machinations!

Hillary sends subliminal message...





When Hillary won Florida a few weeks ago, she blew into the sunshine state for a few minutes to thank the voters for their support, then flew off just as quickly on her broomstick - as some shook their heads in her wake - baffled.

An exercise in futility some wondered?

After all, the votes wouldn't count, would they?

As I noted in a post at that time, it was a smart political move.

Now that the presidential hopeful is whining in the press about Florida - and twisting arms in Democratic circles to get at least a partial credit for the delegates she feels she won fair and square there - the width and breadth of Hillary's machinations have come to light.

Hate to say it, but "told you so".

But, fasten your seatbelts. If my instinct is correct, wily Hillary still has a few clever tricks up her sleeve, believe me.

That's why I prefer women in strapless gowns. Better yet, naked.

Remember what John Quinton once said,
"Politicians are people who, when they see light at the end of the tunnel, go out and buy some more tunnel."

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

New York to alter Gay Marriage policy...New York Times news alert!




According to a news flash from the New York Times late this afternoon, Governor Peterson of New York State has directed all state agencies to revise their policies and regulations to recognize same-sex marriages performed in California, Massachussetts, and Canada.



Ellen Degeneres & Portia de Rossi to wed...



On the heels of the request, David Nocenti - legal counsel for the Governor's office - noted that gay couples married elsewhere "should be afforded the same recognition as any other legally-performed union."

News at 11!

Now, owners at Honeymoon resorts may recognize gay couples...

New York Times...blogsters up in arms over Emily Gould exposed (gawker.com) coverage!

Would the real Emily Gould step forward, please...


A brouhaha has built to a fever pitch over the past few days since the reputable New York Times Magazine (Sunday Edition) posted a cover story (a confessional essay) written by former gawker.com blogster - Emily Gould.

One commentator lamented the angst of the many,

"How can it be that such vapid foolishness be accorded the importance of a cover piece in the Times Magazine," Leo Dymkoski (?) raged in an obvious snit.

L.M. - ("lips moving", perhaps?) - demanded that the newsies at the top dog media outlet in New York City,

"Please stop embarrassing our generation with mindless prattle."

The flood of mostly negative comments poured into the portal so fast and furious - that the NYT's response forum was overwhelmed. Webmasters temporarily froze the discussion launch 'til they were able to clear a staggering backlog.

In the aftermath of the seismic quake that shook - not stirred - the blogs around the globe, Critics and media analysts hastened their plumming of the mystical depths for answers to "what just happened" - and concluded the musings were obviously more profound than "vagaries of internet micro-celebrity".


In one unsuspecting moment - a quiet "green light" for an off-beat feature - managed to unwittingly tap a vein of "media-world animus" lurking in the shadows, previously uncharted (or even imagined).

To some, Ms. Gould was simply narcisstic.

To others, self-absorbed.

Others lambasted the redcoat for "unapologetically pursuing a kind of reportage that featured her as the main character in every story and the people around her as supporting actors."

A reporter in the LA TIMES rubbed salt in the wound when he expressed the view that, "...thanks to the Internet, this kind of performance journalism - where the writer is her own subject - is gaining ground."

Well, that may be a bit harsh.

In some quarters, a blog is simply a new-fangled "diary", that spits out and sets adrift scratchy thoughts daily - left alone thereafter to pitch on their lonesome - on the tumultous waves of the media sea.

As to the issue of positioning one in the piece?

Well, in view of the myriad number of news outlets clawing about in the blogosphere just now, I surmise it behooves a writer to personalize a story - tell it from an intimate point of view - on occasion.

Otherwise - blog features drawing on the same tired old sources leveraged to all ad nauseam - would end up on the world-wide-web sorry tales - all carbon copies of each other.

Notwithstanding, irate readers in this instant scenario have another option. Why waste valuable grey matter sweating over such an insignificant tawdry issue?

Especially in view of the fact that to some,

"There is no such thing as bad publicity."

I disagree, but I'm probably in the minority in that regard.

Personally, I'd prefer to be bestowed with the prestigious honor of recognition in my chose field of endeavour, in a more dignified - rarefied light - when it comes to my moment in the sun.

In fact, a handful of bloggers accused the author of tyranical machinations, pointed the finger for fanning the flames for the sake of celebrity.

That is a far cry from penning an article innocently - or from the heart - then being hit by a tidal-wave of media attention in spite of the fact no bait was offered up seeking that end.

The former probably deserves the disgust of the madding crowd.



I was amused when one journalist inferred that Ms. Gould had broken some kind of code of ethics - pooh-poohed proper etiquette - or a blogger rule or regulation.



Is there a forbidden line in what one labeled - the peep-holed-filled boundaries of the Internet between the public and the private - where one dare not tread?

If so, then let's cut to the chase.

Is there a guide blog freshmen - or Internet newbies - can turn or subscribe to in a good-faith effort to fathom the social-political mores to adhere to...so that one may plot their musings to subtly jive with the axis of the Internet and its intricate myriad mysteries?

The dictionary has yet to list "blog" or "blogger" within the pages of their sacred march of words. Indeed, the internet - and its inhabitants - have yet to be fully defined literally or in a legally significant context. Go figure!

In my mind's eye, the Internet has the potential to be a thrilling adventure - "into the wild" and the "untamed" - and a virutal freewheeling territory ( a new frontier) - where the adventurous may be beckoned at a whim to explore - unhindered by the sluggish, prudish, high-strung few - who lack the intelligence, imagination, or vision to embrace it.

Let's not silence a voice because we don't warm up to the message it's transmitting.

Instead, apply the meaning of an old familiar phrase,

"Consider the source"

Then move on, unspoiled by the rude interruption.

Gloved ones gave gawker blogster the finger...

Chelsea Clinton...trotted out to sell t-shirts! No shame?

Just as a bunch of us were getting ready to don nifty party hats, click the heels of our dazzlin' Ruby Red slippers, and mirthfully break into a raucous rendition of Oz's - "Ding Dong the Witch is Dead" - I received a curious e-mail from Hillary's pride and ultimate joy, the lovely Chelsea Clinton.

The e-mail, personally addressed to me, noted Hillary and Chelsea needed my help in making a critical decision!

At the precise moment I perused the heartfelt message, my inclination was to zip off an emotionally-charged e-mail myself.

"Get out while you can. Gracefully, if it's a possibility at this stage of the game."

But alas, Chelsea - like her parents - was inclined to flag a dead horse.

She was writing to ask that I vote on a t-shirt they'd like to put into commission for the next phase of their presidential campaign.

Yeah, that thump you heard was my jaw falling with a thud to the floor.

Chelsea proceeded with the kind of zest and enthusiasm only she could muster up,

"We recently launched a contest to design a campaign t-shirt and I couldn't believe the incredible response (nor could I). We got thousands of great entries (from the political pundits, I expect). They were creative (2 primary colors), inspirational (stump for Hillary. Hump for Bill), funny (We don't have no stinking papers), and beautiful (latest publicity stills of Hillary's derriere, no doubt). It was amazing to see the devotion to my mom's campaign come through in each t-shirt (one size fits all)."

Suffice to say, I was not aware there was any hipster fashion focus underway in the waning political dynasty realms.

I guess little things like putting gas in the car, paying the mortgage, and trotting off to the mailbox to see if my rebate check had arrived yet, have kept my thoughts focused elsewhere!

Chelsea (she is a sweet gal, isn't she?) continued with her snake-oil pitch,

"It wasn't easy to narrow it down, but we've chosen five we think are particularly great, and now we need your help in making our final decision. Please vote for your favorite design. The winning shirt will go on sale in our online campaign store."

Well, if the t-shirt offering is a cute way to raise much-needed cash, then God be with her.

However, if the purpose of the selection is to select a "t" for the next rally, I'd say, cut the losses and spring for lunch for the volunteers, instead

After all, Chelsea, the red carpet has been yanked out from under your Mother's sensible shoes - and if you hadn't noticed - the parade is chasing after the great white (and black) hope - Barack Obama - intoxicated with the idea of change, not casual outerwear!

To humor Ms. Clinton, I offered up some suggestions to chew on.

I kinda' like the the one that shows the four faces of Eve - um - Hillary.

While Clinton supporters would argue that the "t" depicts the many facets of Hillary's capabilities, others might stridently zero in on the image - and astutely note - it hones in on the duplicity of her character (doubled, for good measure).

The one about being knocked up - er - down is catchy. Yeah, we all know how Hillary came up from the school of hard knocks and what a feisty pit bull she can be when push comes to shove. I'm inclined to lean on a vote this way, myself.

But, the pant suit statement said it best.

The subtle inference - and a lesson well-learned - from a lady trying to crash the Old Boys' Network? When in a man's world, play hardball. Tease him with the fact you look better in a smart suit than the "suits" themselves.

They're sure to exclude 'ya, alright.

Tuesday, May 27, 2008

Bill Clinton, Cindy McCain, Michelle Obama...who would make best 1st Lady?

Bill's conservative look for State functions...


I just about laughed my socks off when I spied a poll on the Zimbio web site a few minutes ago.

Voters have the opportunity to cast a ballot for the spouse of the presidential candidate they figure to be the best potential 1st Lady.

There, amid the photos of Michelle Obama and Cindy McCain, is a flattering pic of Slick Willy looking bright-eyed and bushy-tailed! Emphasis on tail.


Currently Bill is in the lead with 44% of the vote. Meanwhile, Cindy is in 2nd place with 34%, as Michelle trails valiantly behind with 22%.

But, the night is young!

Say now, perhaps this is Bill's golden opportunity to reveal a bit of his feminine side to the American voters.

He may be a better man for it.

In a swirl of fashion fantasy, I envision the poser in a simple - yet elegant - chic strapless number.

Fire-engine red, don't you think?

That tart!

Don't forget to give a good tuck here and there, Bill.

We don't want any sly Jack-in-the-box popping out unexpectedly now, do we?

Stand up and be heard folks. Surf over to zimbio now.

May the best woman - um - womanizer, win!

www.zimbio.com


Michelle to springboard from White House to American Idol...

9th Circuit Court of Appeals rules...laptop searches permissable!

O'Scannlain...twisted brain turns out ludicrous rulings!


Because of a recent court ruling, savvy travellers with ubiquitous laptops in tow, may want to consider storing "sensitive" data or scintillating musings of a personal nature on discs left at home or face the real threat that - what the Government may perceive as "dirty laundry" - may be exposed in public at the airport or local rail station.

The last time I passed through the border with my laptop, I was a bit startled when a stiff official-looking Customs Official briskly strode up and asked that I fork over the slim elegant pc for inspection.

What would anyone want with my innocent blog material is any person's guess, eh?

Along that line of thought - and after a moment of reflection - I am reminded of an old episode of "Dynasty". In that night's intense hire-wire segment - presented in fabulous color on a wide screen amid a gaggle of gay boys at the Backlot on La Peer - Alexis ended up in the hospital after she was a victim of a murder attempt.




When the Detective sauntered into her room and questioned her as to who might want to cause her harm - the response was delicious - to say the least.



She thought for a sec - at which point - one unsavory foe came to mind.

"Well, there's..."

But, her voice trailed off as quickly as she began. Now, another face loomed large in the inner recesses of her well-coiffed head.

"Or, it could have been..."

She nervously twisted in her bed, and her eyes went wide beneath the perfectly made-up-face, as she came to grips with the reality that there may be three, or four, or - how many potential suspects?

A few at least!

Yeah, Alexis attracted enemies like flies to sh**.

But, back to my story.

Of course, no one would be interested in my humble thoughts, or even a smidgen of the harmless gossip I'm prone to spring on an unsuspecting Internet, right?

With a bit of a flourish, he set the PC lightly on the counter. Then, with great precision - on finger tippy-toe, if you will - he gingerly slipped on a pair of pristine white gloves. Not like in the Doctor's office where the examiner thrusts them on with a "thwack" and barks out to "bend over" to facilitate a rude grope in the buttocks for a prostrate check.

Gosh, I keep getting sidetracked.

At this juncture, the dedicated customs agent scanned the surface of my laptop with a smart stylish wand with due care and professional diligence. Satisfied that it was not going to blow up in his face, he proceeded to flip open the lid and power it on.

After a few delightful bars of the windows theme sprang to life and sang out across the airport concourse, all the flashy icons fired up on the miniature screen before him.

'Ya know, he eyed 'em all with keen suspicion.

Yes, I do not have a number of intriguing software installations that may just pique the curiosity of the most mundane imaginations.

Satisfied that everything was A-OK, he closed the lid carefully and passed it off to me.

And, in a few seconds, he was intently observing the next passenger for tell-tale signs of evil-doings, I dare say.

The long and short of it is this. For those of you who thought that data in your laptop was safe - and beyond scrutiny - well, as some futurists would say, do a double-think.

Recently, an Appellate Court ruled that a laptop may not only be thoroughly searched - but the party who owns it, detained - if there is any hint of impropriety or illegal activity within the confines of its compact space.

In respect to the instant litigation aforementioned - pleadings in the proceeding established that when Michael Timothy Arnold (a Mathematics teacher) passed through LAX - a routine glance at the data inside revealed two photographs of naked women.

On the premise that there may be more pornographic material concealed in corresponding files - or elsewhere - Mr. Arnold was summarily detained and searched. And, in a further probe after the initial discovery, agents were shocked to uncover questionable nude photographs of children.

Consequently, he was summarily charged with possession and transportation of child pornography under applicable law.

Maximum jail sentence if convicted? Thirty years.

The man filed suit and argued that a laptop is not unlike a person's home, and as such, can not be searched without good cause, on the wings of a warrant, what have you.

Early on in the first stage of the litigation, a bench-warmer agreed.

In fact, in the lower court, U.S. District Court Judge Dean Pregerson ruled that the evidence found on the laptop was inadmissible. In his ruling, Pregerson opined that electronic storage devices are an extension of a person's memories and thoughts and cannot be legally searched without reasonable suspicion.

Well, that notion gets a guffaw from me, in spite of the fact I am fairly open-minded! Yes sir, I am all for laptops being bestowed the honor of - "sacred hallowed places" - where the nefarious high priests of State, Church, and prying Society dare not tread without due cause.

But, an appeal was lodged by the Federal Government (natch).

In their moving papers they argued that the law allows searches at the nation's borders without reasonable suspicion. Hence, their actions were within the law.

Now, how do you feel about that Homeland Security Act? Fess up!

After taking the matter under submission, the presiding 9th Circuit Justice - Diarmuid O'Scannlain (a boob by any standards) - stated in his opinion,

"Arnold has failed to distinguish how the search of his laptop and its electronic contents is logically any different from the suspicionless border searches of travelers' luggage that the Supreme Court and we have allowed."

Now, we get to why O'Scannlain is a moron.

To back his position, he snidely remarked that since a man can not "live" in a laptop (cheeky devil) and it is transportable - it is not like a home - at all.

You don't say! Brilliant deduction, Watson.

In the final analysis, his absurd notion is what negated the Appellant's arguments.

What we have here is a bona fide legal idiot, folks!

The Supreme Court finding that a laptop is like a suitcase - which is subject to legal search - makes more sense.

Albert Einstein said once,

"Whoever undertakes to set himself up as a judge of Truth and Knowledge is shipwrecked by the laughter of the Gods."

Can you hear the laughter, Justice O'Scannlain?

Mike Oldfield...Tubular Bells (stunning)

Monday, May 26, 2008

Hillary Clinton...seeks Divine Intervention! A long wait.

God blesses the Queen...


On a campaign stump in Puerto Rico, Hillary Clinton put her foot in her mouth again!

In defense of her position to remain in the presidential race - in the wake of a lot of criticism from voters and political pundits alike around the Nation - she inferred that she's waiting for a divine intervention, of sorts.

With a straight face, she asserted,

"There isn't anything we cannot do together if we seek God's Blessing and if we stay committed and are not deterred by setbacks that often fall in every life."

She got it wrong, again!

Her remarks revealed just how ignorant she is about the workings of God, the laws of karma, and the like.

Yes, an individual may pray for God's help to achieve a goal in life; but, that doesn't mean the Lord will grant the "wish".

As George Bush would say, "God is the decider."

Because God is all-knowing, he'll determine if the "blessing" sought is worthy of consideration, whether it jives with the cosmic plan and the natural order of things.

Notwithstanding, the lord has already given Hillary various signs in recent weeks that her plans for the White House are "kaput".

Obviously, Mrs. Clinton made the statement knowing full-well that a majority of Puerto Ricans are religious folk.

In the final analysis, her lofty assertions amount to a campaign "ploy" designed to rustle up voter support.

Unfortunately for hapless Hillary, God is not so easily manipulated, contrary to what she and slick Willy may think!

Eleanor Powell once said,

"What we are is God's gift to us. What we become is our gift to God."

Sunday, May 25, 2008

Mental Illness...show compassion!


Just take a trip to the local library, a gander at a couple of anonymous or faceless posts on a popular blogsite on the Internet, or a stroll through the streets of downtown Los Angeles - and elsewhere - and it will become obvious that mental illness is a growing problem in this country today.

Sometimes there is an elephant in the room, but no one wants to talk about it.

But the issue is a serious one.

Should we just ignore the problem - (will it just go away?) - or should we tackle the issues head on?

Today, in our complex - and at times - baffling and troubling society, it appears more people are feeling alienated, left out, or just plain angry.

Many are crying out for help…

We need to listen.

Medical findings of researchers

A mental illness or mental disorder is a clinically significant psychological pattern that occurs in an individual and is usually associated with distress or a disability that is not expected as part of normal development or the culture, itself.

Most agree, there has been a better understanding of mental illness over the past couple of decades.

Despite the fact - definitions, assessments, and classifications of mental disorders can vary - criteria listed in the ICD, DSM and other manuals are widely accepted by mental health professionals.

Categories which may require diagnosis include - mood disorders, anxiety disorders, psychotic disorders, eating disorders, developmental disorders, personality disorders, for starters.

In many cases, there is no single accepted or consistent cause of mental disorders.

But, mental disorders have been found to be common in over one-third of the population in most countries that have reported sufficient data to track and document.

Mental health services may be based in hospitals or in the community where mental health professionals have the facilities to diagnose individuals using different methodologies.

Psychotherapy and psychiatric medication are two major treatment options that may be worth considering.

Supportive interventions may appear to be a harsh approach, but are worthwhile pursuing, nonetheless.

In some instances, treatment may be involuntary where legislation allows.

A number of activists in the field have campaigned for changes in mental health services and attitudes about the disease, especially in view of the fact there is a widespread problem with stigma and discrimination.

Information provided by he National Institute on Mental Health

Mental disorders are common in the U.S. and internationally.

An estimated 26.2 percent of Americans ages 18 and older — about one in four adults — suffer from a diagnosable mental disorder in a given year.

When applied to the 2004 U.S. Census residential population estimate for ages 18 and older, this figure translates to 57.7 million people.Even though mental disorders are widespread in the population, the main burden of illness is concentrated in a much smaller proportion — about 6 percent, or 1 in 17 — who suffer from a serious mental illness.

In addition, mental disorders are the leading cause of disability in the U.S. and Canada for ages 15-44.

Many people suffer from more than one mental disorder at a given time.

Nearly half (45 percent) of those with any mental disorder meet criteria for 2 or more disorders, with severity strongly related to comorbidity.

The Impact of Mental Illness on Society

The burden of mental illness on health and productivity in the United States and throughout the world has long been underestimated.

Data developed by the massive Global Burden of Disease study conducted by the World Health Organization, the World Bank, and Harvard University, reveal that mental illness, including suicide, accounts for over 15 percent of the burden of disease in established market economies, such as the United States.

This is more than the disease burden caused by all cancers.

*Thanks to World Health for image of "Mental Mask" featured above.

A Profile of Judge Robert Beezer...Corrupt Judge of 9th Circuit Court of Appeals!


On occasion, a review of court documents reveals that a Judge presiding over a case not only failed to adjudicate an issue correctly, but made grievous error(s) which resulted in a gross violation of a party's Constitutional rights.

In addition, the facts may also signal a lack of integrity on the part of the Judge, which may have resulted in a corruption of the court.

Such is the case with Robert R. Beezer, a Senior Judge sitting on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals - who has demonstrated in one case that I know of - that he is not fit to "warm" the bench.

For example, in a case Beezer presided over a few years ago, a litigant appealed to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on several issues - one of which - was pertaining to a lower court ruling denying a right to proceed IN FORMA PAUPERIS (waiver of filing fees).

In respect to the fee waiver issue, Beezer incorrectly ruled that because the "Petition for Relief" was denied in the lower court, and the appellant subsequently paid the filing fees thereafter, that the issue was "moot" in the Appellate court.

On the contrary.

Judge Beezer not only established his ignorance of applicable statutes, but a shocking willingness to deceitfully ignore his duty to uphold Justice in a "Court of Law" and openly discriminate against an IN PRO PER litigant.

Notwithstanding, his grievous legal error caused considerable hardship to the litigant involved, for which he should be ashamed.

For example, in the lower court the litigant was entitled to a "waiver of fees", based on his low income. That right was protected by Statute.

When the court failed to issue a ruling, and serve him with notice, the litigant was forced to pay the fees out of his meager earnings to salvage his "case".

Just because the appellant paid the filing fee, did not make the issue "moot". In fact, it made it more grievous and ripe for legal issue.

In sum, the litigant was denied his right to a waiver of fees. Because of this, he was forced to use funds - that would normally be used to pay for food, rent, and the necessities of life - to pay court costs to which he was legally entitled a waiver.

Was Judge Beezer too stupid to figure this out, or was he demonstrating his distaste for disadvantaged litigants without the benefit of funds to secure legal counsel?

The fact the appellant paid the fees under great hardship - and "did without the necessities of life" to do so - does not negate the fact he was denied his legal right to a waiver of fees, nor does it make the issue "moot".

In sum, Judge Robert R. Beezer's ruling is a bunch of hokus-pokus bullsh**.

In fact, the erroneous ruling - in the public record and available for close scrutiny by the wise, the mighty, and the compassionate - calls attention to a man who has not only fallen from Grace, but - ultimately - "is a disgrace" to the Judiciary and in the eyes of the Lord.

As Martin Erdmann aptly put it,

Appellate Division judges [are] the whores who became madams.”

Babies..."damaged goods" due to lack of parenting skills!


The other morning as I was exiting Starbucks, a woman strode up to the front door of the popular cafe pushing a stroller with a baby inside.

Then, for some inexplicable reason, she turned the buggie on its wheels and scurried off the other way. As I alighted from the cafe, I noticed her cowering in the corner near a table. Other patrons were staring at her oddly, too.

When I asked her if she'd like some assistance opening the door, she mumbled something incoherently.

Perplexed, I went on my way; but my heart went out to that child.

If the woman was on drugs or alcohol, the effect on a young tot could be devastating.

Many parents are unaware of the fact that in the formative years - one to five, in particular - their baby is most impressionable.

During that time span, most of their personality traits are formed, arising out of daily events - negative and positive - that parents unwittingly thrust them in to.

In some instances, a lack of proper care and nurturing may not only scar the young one, but result in a personality disorder that he or she may carry around with them for life.

I have been fascinated by the subject every since I took a course in psychology focusing on - "Personality Profiles" - a few years ago at St. Mary's College in Brentwood, California.

A number of prominent psychologists contributed to the fascinating course material in the compulsory text.

Eric Erickson - for instance - believed that personality develops in a series of stages and his intriguing theories zeroed in on the impact of social experience across the individual's entire lifespan.

One of the main elements of Erikson’s psychosocial stage theory is the development of ego identity, an interest shared by fellow colleague, Sigmund Freud.

Freud (who shared my birthday!) theorized that there are three basic aspects to that identity: the Id, the Ego, and the Superego.

Ego identity is the conscious sense of self that we develop through social interaction. According to Erikson, our ego identity is constantly changing due to daily experiences and information acquired in our constant interactions with others.

Obviously, the quality of the relationship between mother and child in those early years is of paramount importance.

In addition to ego identity, the prominent scholar also believed that a sense of competence also motivated behaviors and actions.

In Erickson's view, there are a handful of stages that are intertwined with the task of becoming competent in a specific area of life. If the stage is handled well, for example, the person will feel a sense of mastery in their sphere. If the stage is managed poorly, the individual may emerge with a deep-rooted sense of inadequacy.

In each stage, Erikson believed people experience a conflict that serves as a turning point in their development. And, these conflicts are centered on either developing a psychological quality or failing to develop that quality.

During these times, the potential for personal growth is high, but so is the potential for failure.

Trust vs. Mistrust (Stage 1)

The first stage of Erikson’s theory of psychosocial development occurs between birth and one year of age and is the most fundamentally important stage. Because an infant is utterly dependent, the development of trust is based on the dependability and quality of the child’s parents.

If a child successfully develops trust, they will feel safe and secure in the world. Providers who are - inconsistent, emotionally unavailable, or rejecting - contribute to feelings of mistrust in the children they watch over. Failure to develop trust will result in fear and a belief that the world is inconsistent and unpredictable.

Autonomy vs. Shame and Doubt (stage 2)

The second stage of Erikson's theory of psychosocial development takes place during early childhood and is focused on children developing a greater sense of personal control and freedom in their environment.

Like Freud, Erikson believed that toilet training was a vital part of this process. However, Erikson's reasoning was quite different then that of Freud's. Erikson believe that learning to control one’s body functions leads to a feeling of control and a sense of independence.

In contrast, other psychologists mentioned in the course, felt that potty-training a child too early may result in the development of an anal retentive personality!

Other important events include selective control at meal times, preferences for playthings, and clothing selection.

Children who successfully complete stage two (moi) feel secure and confident, while those who do not are left with a sense of inadequacy and self-doubt.


Add a negligent parent, without parenting skills into the mix, and the end result is obvious: a troubled untrusting child unable to develop properly through the natural stages in the early years.

Something to chew on, parents.

Clarence Darrow once said,

The first half of our lives is ruined by our parents, and the second half by our children.

Saturday, May 24, 2008

Fredrick Prescott...Kinetic Steel Sculptures delight patrons in park!



Probably a handful of the most delightful works of art I've recently encountered were on display in the recent exhibit - "Affaire in the Gardens" - crafted by talented sculptor Fredrick Prescott.

In fact, the kinetic steel sculptures of wild animals - Moose, Giraffes, and Elephants - were a big crowd-pleaser when they were unveiled in the lush gardens in Beverly Hills.

When a passer-by happens across the bold, colorful, cartoon cut-outs - they not only strike a chord, but hit the funny bone a bit - and by virtue of their pure whimsy - resonate deep within the artistic sensibilities.

According to the congenial Prescott, "everything inspires him".

For instance, the vibrant colors that find their way into his sculptures are drawn from what he categorizes as - "the distinctively electric palette of the contemporary world around him".

And, he goes on to wax poetic, that the pieces reflect experiences which he has transformed into - "half-real, half-fantastic images" - that are a tangible example of the joy and humor he finds in everything that he observes.

Whether depicting frenetic street scenes, or the world of animals and nature, all the artworks reflect his joyful perspective on a world that is humorous and colorful, according to the outgoing artist.

In particular, I marveled at the novelty of the kinetic aspect of his animal sculptures. The metal "sheets" (which comprise the bold buoyant forms) are balanced in such a way - that depending on the specific design of each - a head bobs up-and-down or side-to-side, powered by the natural prevailing wind.

In the mind's eye of a few, the amusing sculptures amount to innovative weather vanes!

Since 1974, Prescott has exhibited his work all over the world and created special pieces on commission for both private and corporate collectors; including Walt Disney Co., Porsche, and the Chicago Bulls, among others.

Also, Prescott’s larger-than-life sculptures have frequently been installed in public parks and venues where people of all ages and backgrounds can view them.

On the day I was joyfully savoring the artworks up-close, a resident of Beverly Hills was arranging for Mr. Prescott to drop by so the family could order up a special garden sculpture for the kids and neighbors to enjoy.

As Henry Ward Beecher once said,

Every artist dips his brush in his own soul, and paints his own nature into his pictures.

http://www.prescottstudio.com

Bill Clinton...maneuvers for No. 2 spot?


Rumors - which have been fleshed out a smidgen in a recent TIME magazine report - abound that Bill Clinton has been stealthily scheming with key players in the background in a bold-faced effort to pitch Hillary's prospects for the VP ticket in the upcoming election this fall.

Has he conceded she'll lose the shot at top dog?

On the heels of the startling scoop, the New York Times proceeded to report at week's end that the maneuverings are definitely not fiction.

But, writers came up empty-handed (again) when it came to quoting direct sources, since the elusive tattle-tales behind-the-scenes preferred to remain anonymous, for obvious reasons.

In the Hillary camp, top-level organizers are adamant that neither Mr. Clinton nor anyone else in the camp had given up on Hillary's candidacy for Prez. In fact, they emphasized that "no efforts" were being made to position their hapless candidate to be a potential "running mate".

Howard Wolfson - Hillary's Director of Communications - stated for the record,

"Senator Clinton is solely focused on being the Democratic nominee. I have seen no interest on her part in being Vice President."

So, what gives?

Friends close to Bill have sworn up-and-down that slick Willy's "musings" have been more than just piffle. In fact, they have allegedly whispered that the former president believes that an Obama-Clinton ticket could help unify the party.

Apparently, he's worried, too. In one conversation he inferred that Obama might wave off an overture, when he argued to confidants that Hillary had at least "earned a meeting with Obama to discuss the possibility."

Ouch!

A pain in the butt? More like a groveling ne'er do well, if you ask me.

"If she's not going to be the nominee, then he wants her in the second spot. In the long run, it's the best way for her to run again in 2016," a friend in the shadows chipped in.

2016!

If I am not mistaken, most voters are under the impression that a vote for Barack Obama ultimately brings a screeching halt to the "Clinton" regime. After all, isn't that what Obama's campaign message is supposed to be all about - change?

The idea of Hillary clinging on to 2016 is a staggering thought.

Is she plotting to rise up to the stature of - Mother Teresa - one day? Minus the skirt, of course!

The unexpected scenarios have caused me to reflect a little.

Has Hillary finally recognized the fact that the party is finally over?

If so, is pride just getting in the way?

At this juncture, it is probably best to quote the scriptures,

"When pride comes, then comes disgrace; but with humility comes wisdom"

Come clean now, Hillary. The truth will set you free.

Bill, there you go again!

Shelter..."coming out" film refreshing in approach!


As I waited for the ushers to cart out the trash from the first screening of "Shelter" at the Regency Theatre, an elderly woman sauntered out of the pitch black and struck up a bit of idle chit-chat with me.

"The film is about two gay guys. But, not much goes on in the movie," she assured me.

"No fights, nothing."

Not having screened the film yet, I was inclined to respond in an upbeat fashion.

"Maybe that's the message. Maybe life doesn't always have to be an ordeal."

When the curtain fell, and the storyline unfolded, I was forced to consider the woman was either out-of-her-cups or had fallen asleep during the movie.

Yes, the film starts off fairly routine.

An appealing young man is holed up with his sister and her young child in a spotty part of San Pedro (in that respect, a downer for sure!).

Although a relationship with a pretty young gal appears to be on keel, he is struggling - on the other hand - to achieve success as an artist.

On a trip to pick up some gear at his best friend's house in an upscale part of town - he casually runs into the older brother - a handsome virile surfer.

One thing leads to another - and suddenly - the pretty dudes end up in-between the sheets together.

The romance unfolds so naturally, and believably, that it appears for all-the-world to be a kind-of fairy-tale love story.

Only in the movies, right?

But, as fate would have it, loved ones - a sister, for instance - throw a damper on things.

"I can't deal with you being a fag right now, not with all my problems," she whines.

Suddenly, the young man goes into a tailspin, doubts his feelings for the surfer, and ends up going through a traumatic period of angst, denial, and uncertainty about the lifestyle that possibly lurks ahead.

As the kinks work their way out, the predictable happens.

The winsome twosome reunite in a classic Hollywood-style ending.

Yeah, gays are not immune to the bull**it producers doll out under the guise of marketability.

"Shelter's" strong suit springs from its strident capacity to take a fresh approach to otherwise cliché material over well-travelled territory.

Yes, this project is a long cry from its groundbreaking forefathers such as - "Boys in the Band", "Lone Companion", and "Brokeback Mountain".

There is a lot of eye-candy scattered about the landscape to gobble up, too - lush beach settings, for instance - populated by tanned yummy-looking people.

Who knew Prince Charming was so easy to stumble upon in a world of tortured gay men?

However, I found one aspect of the feature a bit troubling.

In spite of the fact the surfer is older and has obviously slept around a bit - the issue of HIV status and "safe sex" - is never broached.

I found the producers negligent in this regard and their actions unconscionable.

In fact, this film sugar-coats a number of important gay issues.

In the final analysis, "Shelter" ends up being sheer fantasy.

A bad message to promote to the young gay community.

Friday, May 23, 2008

Balenciaga...debuts in West Hollywood!


If you saunter up the street from the celebrity hot spot - The Villa - you'll stumble across a well-manicured lava garden with a row of stunning 6 foot cacti edging the walkway on trendy Melrose Avenue.

The site houses the chic Balenciaga boutique - the only outlet for the discerning upscale clotheshorse to shop in - outside of Manhattan in the continental U.S.

Nicholas Ghesquiere - the creative director - fell in love with the building early on when locations were being scouted for the fashion house known for its cutting-edge designs and celebrity clients like Kate Moss, Jennifer Connelly, and Nicole Kidman.

The two-story Gucci-owned store is quite distinctive, brimming with high glamour, and has a futuristic feel to it.

Ghesquiere - and the French artist Dominique Gonzalez-Foerster - zeroed in on a signature color (blue); then, used scintillating lighting techniques to ensure there would be dynamic rhythms in the light throughout the day as the sun lazily moved across the sky.

In addition, the visionary duo installed shutter-like blue slats to run floor-to-ceiling along the walls to maximize the affect.

There are state-of-the-art designer touches too - LED lighting fixtures, custom-made display cases that open with touch-activated mechanisms, and interior walls etched with silver leaf, for a luxurious feel.

Customers are usually wowed by a geometric pattern on the floor in the grand entrance which is artfully set with three shades of elegant marble.

The moneyed elite are easily enticed in the inviting front door by a well-stocked mini-bar, bathrooms concealed by sliding doors, and dressing rooms that feature gender specific seating.

The fashion collection is far-reaching.

Here, you'll plunk down $350.00 for designer shades or $3,000.00 for a chic one-of-a-kind handbag.

Meanwhile, dazzling eye-popping gowns range from a paltry $1,000.00 to $70,000.00.

Just say, "charge it", in the VIP dressing room.

By the way, David Barry once said,

"The leading cause of death among fashion models is falling through street grates."

Bill Clinton...pain in butt?

They're right...she does have a big a**.


The media has been trying to pin down Obama on potential running mates for the upcoming election.

But, he's been a bit coy with the press. And, determined not to overstep himself in these precarious political times.

In spite of the fact it's obvious someone in the wings will have to reach out with a hook, and yank Mrs. Clinton off the world stage kickin' and screamin' at the appropriate nod, Obama has been quite a gentleman about it - biding his time patiently.

Is the nomination in the bag yet?

Not if Hillary would have her druthers.

On the subject of choosing an individual for the Vice Presidential ticket, one reporter pointedly asked Obama,

"Will you be willing to consider everyone a possible running mate, even if his or her spouse is a pain in the butt?"

A veiled reference to slick Willy?

After a roar from the crowd, and a moment to collect his thoughts, Barack was inclined to note for the record that one of his heroes - Abraham Lincoln - often filled positions with rivals, so why not?

That old familiar saying comes to mind,

"Keep your friends near, but your enemies closer."

If that's the route he goes, the man must be a masochist.

If you ask me, jousting with Hillary in the White House would amount to utter he**.


Personally, I wouldn't tempt fate by sipping any beverage or munching on any delectable goody she brought to the Oval Office around afternoon tea, either.

Barack, beware of Greeks who bear gifts...

Divine Grace...quote!


Divine Grace is a manifestation of the cosmic free will in operation.

It can alter the course of events in a mysterious manner through its own unknown laws, which are superior to all natural laws, and can modify the latter by interaction.

It is the most powerful force in the Universe.
It is a visitation of a force unexpected and unpredictable.
It is a voice spoken out of cosmic silence.

It is,

Cosmic Will which can perform authentic miracles under its own laws

Paul Brunton
Philosopher & Mystic

Thursday, May 22, 2008

Hillary Clinton...supporters lambast press for slighting her a**!

Artist notes full figure of Hillary too costly to sculpt...

Some times the morning paper is such a hoot.

Like today, for instance.

In an article on the presidential candidates, a journalist reported that Hillary Clinton supporters were irate with the press for casting their presidential hopeful in a bad light.

A couple of 'em whined that the media deliberately used unflattering camera angles to skewer her image. But, worse than that - were guilty of aiming the lens at her bu**cakes - whenever she bent over.

"It's derogatory," one fan fumed.

Well, the target is difficult to miss!

But, I have a suggestion as to how "Hill" can kill two birds with one stone.

Bill's other best-half, should sign on as a spokesperson for a diet product, much like the - "Duchess of York" - did.

In addition to slimming down and improving her image, she'd be able to rustle up some big bucks to breathe life into her sagging - um - campaign.

In the alternative, she could start flouncing about in a muumuu.

After all - to some - the cow is still sacred 'ya know!

L.A. Actor...new glossy mag for performers. Pick up on newstands, now!



Ah, there is a hot new magazine on the stands with a catchy title - L.A. Actor.

It sure is a welcome addition to the local Southern California performing arts scene.

The slick - well-thought out entry - reminds me of the old "Drama-Logue" weekly that used to be a literal "bible" for all the struggling thespians in Hollywood striving for that elusive break in the biz.

The premier edition features Harrison Ford on a glossy cover.

Inside, there are a number of practical features that are sure to add luster to any young actor's tools of the trade.

For instance, there is an insider feature on how to break into commercials. A toughie, I know, since I traversed that well-travelled road in my younger macaroni & cheese days.

There's also a useful guide with audition tips.

In fact, there's also a section on "Casting Notices", in the event a talented few are without a Theatrical Agent doing their bidding, yet.

By the way, don't be disheartened about that.

When I was in-between reps, I submitted myself to casting offices - and on a couple of fortuitous occasions - landed an audition. And - in spite of what the naysayers thought about agent-less-submissions - snatched up the assignment, too!

So, "never say never". Keep the faith, eh?

An informative article on A.C.T. (Actors Comprehensive Training) may be of particular interest to those just starting to nose their way around the lot without much experience under the belt, as well.

One of their staffers notes A.C.T.'s mission is to,

"Bring together the community and help each other network."

When first launching a career in Tinsel town, an unknown actor needs all the help he can get, trust me!

And when they say "trust me", don't!

The industry periodical also has a list of casting directors and agents to submit pictures and resumes to.

Heck, that saves a lot of time going through the yellow pages, or the aggravation of hot-footing it up to the Screen Actors Guild (SAG) or AFTRA (the American Federation of Radio & TV Artists) to snap up a list.

If you're looking for some exposure, or just keen on impressing a handful of friends, L.A. Actor also has a centerfold section where an enterprising performer keen on self-promotion can plop down a few bucks to have a head shot printed alongside other struggling actors in an upcoming issue.

Who knows, you might be discovered - kid!

But, remember what Walter Winchell said,
"Hollywood is where they shoot too many pictures and not enough actors."

Knowledge...quote!


Knowledge should never be hoarded by the few -
To the detriment of the many...

Julian Ayrs
Chocolate Buddha
Collection of Poems

Java Detour...life's embarrassing moments!



This morning a young overweight and unattractive Afro-American lady plopped herself down in a wide easy chair at the Java Detour; then - for some strange reason - got the impression that customers were enamoured of her.

In fact, she turned to one startled guest, and requested that he stop staring at her.

Well, it was one of life's embarrassing moments, for sure.

Unbeknownst to the self-absorbed woman, there was a wide screen over her head broadcasting the morning news. And that, not her, was the focal point of their keen interest.

Poor thing.

When it was brought to her attention, she looked like she wanted to slink away and crawl under a carpet somewhere.

The incident reminded me of an old familiar phrase.

"It's all about me."

Carl Sagan once said,
"It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring."

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Aldous Huxley...on Mescaline! The "Doors of Perception" open...









On the free book shelf at the Bodhi Tree, I stumbled across a rare find.

Ah, a pristine copy of the "Doors of Perception" by Aldous Huxley which chronicles his experimentation with the hallucinogenic drug, mescaline.

During that time span, Huxley fervently explored the inner workings of his mind at a quaint little house in Llano in the Mojave Desert.

The big thrust was on the topic of contemplation, mysticism, and a mind-expanding experiment that would lead him to conclude that both "mescaline" and the controversial drug "lysergic acid" (LSD) were "drugs of distinction" which should be exploited for their "supernaturally brilliant visionary experience".

The book went on to become a best-seller in the psychedelic 1960s and inspired the name of the legendary rock band "The Doors".

For those of you into trivia, Huxley also appeared on the sleeve of a landmark Beatles album - Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band - which scholars and Beatle fans alike are quick to point out featured a curiously surreal tune - "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds" - which they assert refers to an LSD trip embarked on by the fab four.

In retrospect, the mind-bending adventure on the part of Huxley, appeared to be brought on by a lofty quest to go beyond this realm of existence.

The book is rife with colorful insightful text.

"The urge to transcend self-conscious self-hood is, as I have said, a principal appetite of the soul. When, for whatever reason, men and women fail to transcend themselves by means of worship, good works, and spiritual excesses, they are apt to resort to religion's chemical surrogates such as alcohol and "goof pills" in the modern West, alcohol and opium in the East, hashish in the Mohammedan world, alcohol and marijuana in Central America, alcohol and coca in the Andes, alcohol and the barbiturates in the more up-to-date regions of South America."

However, Huxley never deluded himself, if we are to believe his musings in one telling section of the cult classic.

"I am not so foolish as to equate what happens under the influence of mescaline or of any other drug, prepared or in the future preparable, with the realization of the end and ultimate purpose of human life: enlightenment, the beatific vision. All I am suggesting is that the mescaline experience is what Catholic theologians call a "gratuitous grace", not necessary to salvation but potentially helpful and to be accepted thankfully, if made available."

"To be shaken out of the ruts of ordinary perception, to be shown for a few timeless hours the outer and the inner world, not as they appear to an animal obsessed with survival or to a human being obsessed with words and notions, but as they are apprehended, directly and unconditionally, by "Mind at Large" - this is an experience of inestimable value to everyone and especially to the intellectual."

A number of the profound ponderings and other-worldly observations put forth here were undoubtedly triggered by the potent swagger of the mind-altering drug.

A worthwhile read, if you can find it in print.

He said what?

"An intellectual is a person who has discovered something more interesting than sex."

William Blake...quote!



If the doors of perception were cleansed
Everything would appear to man as it is
- infinite -


William Blake

I Ching...influences for the day!

Emperor Fu-Hsi of China



Occasionally, I toss the I CHING to determine what the influences will be during the course of the day ahead.



Today, I cast KWEN.



The Hexagram represents contemplation.



The Earth below

The Wind above



According to my reference book, a small tonal change in the Chinese gives the word KWEN a double meaning, which translates to contemplating and exhibiting.



Therefore, the hexagram refers to both the contemplator and contemplation.

All that is not one is the other.



The shape of the character resembles a Tower - one familiar in ancient China - which is situated on a mountain. In view of this, the image signifies a watchtower (beacon of light) to those above and a landmark to those below.



The shape of the Tower represents the gate of the eternal present which rests in balance between the future and the past (between the contemplator and the contemplated).



As a consequence, the wise man surveys his past for meaningful relevant experience.



The essence of the message is that the individual live fully in the present - with a mind to keeping the illusions of the past and the future - in proper perspective.



Accordingly, it is important for the seeker to remain open to changes.



And, to be able to move freely, without being blocked by the concept of time.



The individual tossing this hexagram represents the wind blowing freely above the Earth.



Although travel is forecast - in a physical or mental sense - the passage stresses that it is not based on a quest or need to run.



There is an opportunity to flutter from experience to experience - without clinging to static precedents, being blocked by unfounded fears, or limited by thought processes - that would otherwise bog an individual down.









The I Ching is one of the classical (ching) Chinese books dating back to Fu Hsi and the Yin dynasty. (2900 BCE)



I Ching means "Book of Changes" in English.





The two branches of Chinese philosophy - Confucianism and Taoism - have common roots in the I Ching.



Emperor Ch'in Shih-huang-ti ordered an arson of books in 213 AD, but the I Ching was fortunate to survive the purge.



The word "book" should be taken in the sense of a "Holy Book" such as it is in the Western cultures.



The sacred book was mainly used for divination - a tool to not only predict future events - but to determine how to "harmonize" with the impending forces surrounding them.



The "Book of Wisdom" is a collection of 64 short essays assigned to 64 figures.



Each character is comprised of six continuous and/or broken lines that require interpretation.



The figures are called hexagrams.



Each hexagram corresponds to a specific life situation.



At the time the coins are tossed, the querent (seeker) divines the forces at work around the circumstances, so that he or she may be guided to take appropriate action that is in harmony with the underlying energies at play.



The I Ching was thoroughly studied and translated into the German language by celebrated author - Richard Wilhelm - who was a Protestant missionary to China.





Carl Jung - who put a lot of stock in the profound influences of synchronicity - wrote the forward for the version which is the most known and appreciated by scholars and laymen alike.



In essence, the I Ching is a gauge on the environment and impending social change.





And, by virtue of the passages divined, it is wholly possible for the serious seeker to chart a path that is in sync with the forces at work rather than in conflict with them.



The I Ching is also capable of revealing the remarkable inter-connectedness of "things" - so that the individual may come to fully recognize that in nature - nothing under the sun and the moon and the stars "happens by chance".



In fact - because of an ongoing "ripple effect" in the Universe - events that appear to be "random or accidental" are not.



Ultimately, the book of changes reflects a sophisticated understanding of environmental and human cycles.



By definition, cycles have a predictable pattern.

Part of the greatness of the "Book of Changes" is that it takes into account how cycles themselves can be influenced and modified to achieve success in one's personal and professional life.



Skilled use of the texts can not only shed light on potential choices - but warn of changes and other interventions - that may alter the course of events in a negative way.



In the final analysis - it's imperative that sentient beings not only be mindful of the forces of nature at work - but strive to be in harmony with them to engender positive changes in one's life.



I Ching quote,



"It is only when we have the courage to face things exactly as they are, without any self-deception or illusion, that a light will develop out of events, by which the path to success may be recognized.