A couple of DJ's were chatting on a talk show the other morning and having a big chuckle over delicate matters regarding a Disc Jockey's 10 year-old daughter.
Frankly, I was shocked by his disgusting comments, which - ultimately - took a poke at his daughter's budding sexuality on the airwaves around the Nation.
Some nurturing father!
For instance, the radio host (in-between ads for the Tim Conway Jr. show) laughed to one of the disc jockeys at his side, that his daughter's "nipples" were just "popping".
What kind of language is that to use in respect to a child's blossoming?
But, it was another remark that really floored me.
The sick radio personality laughed that he strolled into the bathroom on one occasion when his naked daughter was taken a bath - and subsequently - caught her shampooing her "one" hair (in the vagina area).
What a - rude, insensitive, distasteful comment - to utter up about his innocent young child, with the specific aim of entertaining strangers tuned in to the show.
One person I spoke to noted that he thought that one of the Disc Jockey's names mentioned in the broadcast had a daughter who was younger, so I have to wonder if he was just using her as a spring board for a series of jokes that may have been totally without any substance?
Even still, to project those ideas (fantasies?) over the airwaves (especially in view of the current ongoing "Stiles" case underway in Las Vegas) is morally wrong.
Does a loving father really want his young daughter to grow up and have strangers joke to her at a later date, that they used to listen to her father joke about her public hair and nibbles on the radio?
If the disc jockey in questiion has stole custody of the girl, then I would urge that Child Welfare pay the household a visit.
Who knows, maybe he's walking around the house with a hard-on or having sex in front of his daughter, without shame or heart-felt concern for her mental (and sexual) health and overall well-being.
Maybe I'm old-fashioned, but in my view, children need to be protected from this kind of senseless (dangerous) conduct by lame parents who don't think about the ramifications of their actions.
Did he never consider the possibility that by talking in such risque way about his child, some letch on the other end of a radio may become titillated by the fantasies, and go after her?
In my mind's eye, he was placing her safety in jeopardy, when he elected to use her as a sexual punchline!
Shame!
William Butler Yeats once wrote:
"The innocent and the beautiful have no enemy but time."
Who knows, maybe he's walking around the house with a hard-on or having sex in front of his daughter, without shame or heart-felt concern for her mental (and sexual) health and overall well-being.
Maybe I'm old-fashioned, but in my view, children need to be protected from this kind of senseless (dangerous) conduct by lame parents who don't think about the ramifications of their actions.
Did he never consider the possibility that by talking in such risque way about his child, some letch on the other end of a radio may become titillated by the fantasies, and go after her?
In my mind's eye, he was placing her safety in jeopardy, when he elected to use her as a sexual punchline!
Shame!
William Butler Yeats once wrote:
"The innocent and the beautiful have no enemy but time."
http://www.julianayrs.com
No comments:
Post a Comment