Will trial broadcast on YouTube end or trigger hate?
Initially, when a request was made to allow a broadcast of the Proposition 8 Federal trial proceedings - which get underway on Monday in San Francisco - it was assumed that the government would not budge on the issue.
Broadcasts of Federal trials are normally prohibited, after all.
However - in view of the high-profile nature of the case and public concerns hanging in the balance - a Federal Appeals Court Judicial Council jumped ship and opted to allow it under an established "pilot" program wherein a roster of nonjury Civil trials are underway in the Western States.
The Judge presiding over the case gave a nod, too.
U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker noted for the record that it was worth attempting in a case of "this nature" and in view of the widespread interest in the outcome.
Indeed!
The Prop 8 (same-sex-marriage) controversy has just about torn apart the State of California - politically, socially - you name it!
There are a few stipulations, though.
Because some critics have argued that a live feed of the trial may cause a lot of tension for witnesses testifying on the stand (and hence, hinder their ability to speak freely, in open court) the Judge issued an order that the broadcast be delayed with the ultimate aim of preventing that tawdry scenario from unfolding onscreen.
The court's decision to post the trial proceedings on YouTube - signals a remarkable turning point in North American Society - in my opinion.
Has a court proceeding been reduced to a voyeuristic foray while surfing for adrenalin rushes on the World-Wide-Web?
What next, gladiators battling each other 'til death, with blood-thirsty citizens taunting them on?
Sick!
No comments:
Post a Comment