Corrupt Judge Parkin ran slush fund!
If you happen to go downtown to the Los Angeles Superior Court clerk's office, and peruse through some of the old case files on the computer terminal, you might notice something particularly suspicious if you have a keen eye!
In spite of the fact a handful of court files that are getting moldy after ten years should have been expunged from the record according to - State Statutes, Civil Code of Procedure, and so forth and so on - the dog-eared files remain in the public record for any old "joe" to sift through.
Suspicious?
You betcha!
But, there are more sinister crimes afoot at the Los Angeles Superior Court House - which warrant an investigation by high-level Law Enforcement or the Attorney General's Office - because justice cries out for it.
For example, on a couple of occasions when I was at the courthouse conducting research, I stumbled across complaints against individuals - rife with wild accusations that were quite defamatory in nature - which were never served on the alleged "defendants" in the action.
In one instance, it was established on at least two occasions at hearings set by the judge presiding over the proceedings, that there was no service effected on the accused party.
But, get this!
In spite of that glaring irregularity, the case has remained in open file status for over ten years, with no effort made by the court or the accusing parties to resolve the issue.
Curious indeed, when you consider that an individual is entitled to be given notice of such a proceeding, and allowed - pursuant to the concept of "due process" of Law - to appear and challenge the allegations with the aim of exonerating themselves and protecting their good name in the public record.
In this instant case, I surmise that the so-called "evidence" was manufactured - and that the attorneys for the plaintiffs - had no intention of serving the "victim" at all from the get-go.
In sum, the individuals in question, lodged the complaint against the unsuspecting party with the specific aim of damaging their reputation.
The fact that no service was effected, and the court neglected (!) to dismiss the case, hints that the Clerk of Los Angeles Superior Court is somehow involved in the conspiracy.
Is John A. Clarke taking payola to look the other way?
If not, why haven't these case files been destroyed in accordance with the law of the land which requires it (in the aforementioned case for obvious reasons) within the given time span?
When you consider the fact that Presiding Judge Parkin got caught running a slush fund (which received healthy contributions from lawyers in the Los Angeles legal community) - in restrospect - it all makes sense to me.
Parkin is in on the scam, too.
What other explanation can their be for such an grievous oversight on the part of the Court?
News at 11!
No comments:
Post a Comment