.:[Double Click To][Close]:.
Showing posts with label Art. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Art. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

Kids are Alright...T-shirt design contest! WHY Louisville invites you to enter...


The moon's a balloon!

Kids Are Alright


The "Kids Are Alright" T-shirt Design contest is underway!

And, the rules are as simple as one, two, three.

Kids (ages 2 through 10) simply submit their drawings by the deadline date.

One lucky winner will have their artwork fashioned into a t-shirt!

Other prizes include a WHY Louisville shopping spree and art supplies.

All entries will be on display for the month of September in the storefront gallery window.

Entries may be turned in personally at the store which is located at:

1583 Bardstown Road
WHY LOUISVILLE
(502)456-5400


Children interested in entering are also invited to make their creations right in the store at the "Kids are Alright" drawing station!

The deadline for entries is August 31st.

So get cracking, kids!

Rules & Regulations:

http://www.whylouisville.com/kids.asp

Good luck, budding artists!


http://www.julianayrs.com

Thursday, July 2, 2009

Public Enemies...hollow film disappoints!! Style & technique enough to crow about...

Is it me, or is this a queer place to post film credits?



If you are an intelligent film-goer, you may be inclined to steer clear of "Public Enemies" - the much-touted piece of fluff starring charismatic Johnny Depp - which was just released in theatres around the country.

The film on the life & times of Public Enemy No. 1 - John Dillinger - roars onto the silver screen right off-the-bat with a smattering of edge-of-your-seat adrenalin-rushing action, then proceeds to move along at a fast clip.

Great, for starters.

From the get-go, I was dazzled by Michael Mann's (Miami Vice) expert film techniques, which admirably succeeded in buttressing-up the tightly-woven drama as it splashed gloriously before me above the footlights in lush exquisite detail from ambitious beginning to predictable Hollywood-style end.

The actors were often set strategically within the frame (profiles in silhouette, for instance, were often set forward - others farther back - to effect an unsettling tension (or unspoken relationship between the characters), while backgrounds etched in swift small strokes - or lazy wide ones - were offered up when needed to flesh out and add color to the mix when scenarios demanded it.

All-in-all, "Public Enemies" is a visual masterpiece on celluloid which manages to hold the audience captive by virtue of stylized filmmaking approaches and departures that resonate beyond the limitations of the screen normally.

The mesmerizing fictionalized bio - emboldened by gutsy straightforward believable dialogue and fine performances by a stellar supporting cast - is also a smorgasbord for the senses.

Pristine marble polished to perfection in bank foyer backdrops wows, and fashion flourishes from the period flaunt the excesses of the era and openly appeal to the sensibilities in their daring flights of fancy and drama, as the character-driven scoundrels sweep film buffs along in this cautionary tale about high-stakes crimes and a judicial system that is wanting.

The keenest eye could have been fooled, though.

Not mine!

Like a delectable dessert savored at each delicious bite - "Public Enemies" left a sickly sweet aftertaste in my mouth for a moment or two - then faded away.

When 'ya get right down to the nitty-gritty, the sensational Dillinger tale is just a puff piece.

Yes folks, all style and no substance.

A hollow film, in the final analysis.

No wonder!

When a film goer saunters beyond the initial gloss upfront - and likewise - wises up to the manipulative devices playing havoc with the heartstrings, there's not much meat left to feast on.

In sum, the filmmakers' failure to dig deep beneath Dillinger's skin, was their undoing.

Imagine that, the celebrated director didn't even bother to scrape beneath the pretty-boy surface (a little rough around the edges) or even try to fathom what made Dillinger "tick".

One line of dialogue about daily beatings from "Daddy" didn't suffice to fuel - or validate - the rage that ran rampant throughout "Public Enemies" just shy of two-and-a-half hours.

Eureka!

I've stumbled upon the answer.

Just maybe, there was nothing particularly intriguing about Dillinger, to warrant an over-the-top big-budget studio-backed effort.

Say, what were Dillinger's major achievements (claims to fame) in the grand scheme of things, anyway?

Busting out of jail, robbing banks, eluding the long arm of the law?

That's it in a nutshell, folks.

Bottom line, Mann was fixing to exalt a lousy thief!

I expect half-the-reason the Mann (some say he's at the top of his game right now) snapped up Depp to inhabit the role was to capitalize on an image that oozes non-stop with likability.

Just betcha, the studio was counting on Depp's magnetic persona to slop over and subliminally seduce fans and film goers slyly into the theatres and seal their fate at the box office.

That may have been one failing.

Personally, I thought Depp - though scrappy and menacing at times - lacked the ba""s to pull off the role effectively.

Universal's much-anticipated blockbuster cried out for a young DeNiro!

Even still, Depp stole the limelight whenever he appeared onscreen n any capacity.

Not difficult to do.

Christian Bale's characterization - after all - was wooden.

The FBI role he took a stab at required a stretch that was way beyond his acting muscle.

Ah, but he sure looked masculine (and virile) in a period hat when a smattering of spontaneous light & shadows struck his jutting jaw, just so.

When I am noticing silly details like this, the producers are in trouble.

Essentially, "Public Enemies" is just another gangster movie, albeit goosed up a bit with slick imagery and media-rich state-of-the-art modern technology.

If you want to sit back, nibble on popcorn, and forget about your woes for two -and-a-half hours or so, this is the entertaining bill-of-fare you've been pining for.

I'm betting discerning audiences will plunk their bucks down elsewhere for now and catch Depp's gangster flick later on DVD.

3 Stars!

http://www.julianayrs.com/

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

The Tattler...featuring Blogs! Submissions, please...



If you're like moi, you probably have very little time during the course of the day to cruise the Internet, and take a gander at popular new blogs that are revving up - and subsequently - piquing widespread interest out in the wilds of the blogosphere.

On the other hand, perhaps you're an talented insightful blogger with a lot to chirp about.

In spite of the fact you've been toiling away publishing those sizzling posts at the crack of dawn each day, nobody is nibbling at the smorgasbord of delectable goodies you've been tossing their way.

The musings - like zillions of others out there - are going virtually unread.

Meanwhile, the popular "with-it" blog trend-setters, are continuing to make their merry way into dizzying social circles in a big way.

Maybe it's time to pack it in?

Nope!

Now, you have a chance to enter the big leagues, and become a celebrated hit-getter like gossip maven Perez Hilton or the undisputed Queen of the "blogs" Arianna Huffington.

Yes, the Tattler is expanding its horizons, and reaching out into the blogosphere!

Our high-profile website is setting aside a little premium space (!) in order to showcase - and ultimately thrust into the spotlight - a handful of bloggers who deserve a kick-start and a few kudos along the way.

So, if you're a blogger pining for a little more exposure - and aching to be a much-celebrated "Featured Blog" at the Tattler - just zip off an e-mail off to us when you have a mind to.

Contact:

publisher@thetattler.biz

A simple link to your blog to facilitate a quick review of your creative renderings is satisfactory.

However, if you include a brief bio with a couple of insightful (and/or heartfelt) notes on your - hopes, dreams, and wishes - may trigger a profile piece alongside your blog site entry.

Good luck!


Friday, May 8, 2009

Asian Pacific Film Festival...Japan Consul General Ihara attends closing night gala! The Tattler hob-nobs with the tony elite...




Sadly, the Asian Pacific Film Festival came to a close last evening.

But, the annual event did not go quietly into the night!

Indeed, the send-off proceedings were nothing short of dizzying.

Shortly after high-profile stars in the Asian Film community strutted the red carpet amid a flurry of blinding flash bulbs, Japan's Consul General put in a surprise appearance at the podium just prior to the premiere of "Departures" (Best Foreign Film Oscar-winner).

Mr. Ihara congratulated festival organizers for promoting the Asian culture by virtue of the medium of film.

Prior to his current appointment, Ihara served as Deputy Director-General of the Asian & Ocean Affairs Bureau and as a Minister at the Embassy of Japan in the United States.


After the upbeat speech, the distinguished diplomat took his seat to catch the much-anticipated screening, which had been causing a buzz on the festival circuit in recent days.

Just before the curtain fell and the credits rolled, Festival Officials announced the names of a handful of filmmakers who nabbed prestigious awards for their work.

"Children of Invention" (directed by Tze Chun) won the Grand Jury Prize hands down.

Justin Kwong was also singled out for the "Best Newcomer Award" for his performance in the comedy "White on Rice".

Video Interview:

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/05/asian-pacific-film-festivaljustin-kwong.html

Earlier in the evening, director Dave Boyle (White on Rice) paid me quite a compliment when he noted that he'd been watching a video clip I shot at the "Rice" after-party which is currently being broadcast on YouTube.

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/05/asian-pacific-film-festival-on-rice.html

"Quite good," he noted with sincerity.

Flattering, especially when you consider that Mr. Boyle's film also garnered a prize for filmmaking, in addition to the coveted acting prize snapped up by Kwong.

Hiroshi Wanatabe - the male lead in the film - was thrilled with my review.

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/05/asian-pacific-film-festivalwhite-on.html

"I am sending a copy to my family and friends in Japan, " he beamed, as he gave me a polite little bow.

"Departures" (billed as a celebration of life) turned out to be a hit with the audience, by the way.

The cinematography and musical score were particularly outstanding.

A review follows.

Shortly after the lights went up, the well-heeled guests made a bee-line for cocktails (flowing freely from an open bar courtesy of Festival sponsors) then waited patiently in line - in some cases, up to twenty minutes - to gobble up succulent fresh fruit of the season, scrumptious mini-burgers, chicken kabobs, nutritious vegetables, a selection of tasty imported cheeses, and delectable sweets popular in the Orient.

An ongoing dialogue between filmmakers and fans continued on into the witching hour.

In sum, the Silver Anniversary Edition (25th year) of the Asian Pacific Film Festival was a resounding success.

'Til next year!



Dave Boyle, Justin Kwong & Hiroshi Watanabe

Monday, May 4, 2009

Asian Pacific Film Festival..."White on Rice" hilarious comedy! Hiroshi Watanabe star on rise...


Hiroshi Watanabe is on his way to becoming a major star - not just in the Asian coumunity - but in mainstream middle America, too.

Last night the face of the unlikely Hollywood hopeful flickered across the silver screen in an off-beat role in the hilarious comedy feature - "White on Rice" (roughly translated as "stuck on you") - and cinched it for me.

While Mr. Watanabe's comedic timing was impeccable, it was his instictive grasp of the complexities of the medium (and their potential) that I found mesmerizing.

And, that face!

Like the greats before him - Skelton, Gleason, and the Marx Brothers - his lovable mug won't soon be forgotten once the right role throws the spotlight in his direction.

The role of "Jimmy" may just be the launch I am referring to, once the independent feature secures distribution and worms its way around the country.

On the red carpet, Watanabe was outgoing and down-to-earth.

When I quizzed the talented actor about challenges he faced during the short fast shoot, he reflected on the question for about a secord or two, then recalled a curious phenomenon that unfolded beyond his control which was triggered by the two-language scenario foisted on him by the director.

"When I attempted to switch from my native tongue to English, I was forced to pause a second or two, shift gears, then switch into another mode of thinking before continuing with the dialogue," he noted in so many words.

The off-the-wall comedy - about a man-child traumatized by the thought of growing up and taking responsiblity for his life - was directed by Dave Boyd.

"Dave speaks better Chinese than I do," he chuckled.

Aw shucks, Boyd seemed to be grumbling as he stood on the sidelines, and humbly denied the claim.

There is a lot of side-splitting slapstick-style schtick in the independent feature which keeps the madcap screw-ball piece rolling along at a fast and entertzaining clip.

In fact, "White on Rice " is one of the funniest (slickest) films with mainstream appeal to come out of the Asian Community since the tennis spoof - "Ping Pong Playa" - premiered at the Festival last year.

I expect that due to films like "Dim Sum Funeral", "Departures", and "White on Rice" screening now at the Festival's Silver (25th) anniversay, Asian filmmakers (and stars) will be basking in the glow of success once the economy picks up.

Deserving!




Monday, April 13, 2009

"Train Master"...Hollywood Video Stores will carry release of the Phil Bransom children's feature!



Last year, I took in a screening of Phil Bransom's entertaining feature film geared toward the youth market, titled "Train Master".

In a nutshell, the exciting drama is all about a handful of kids who get trapped on a run-away train, and are charged with the responsibility of resolving the dilemma in the face of eminent danger.

I reviewed Bransom's - "Train Master" - shortly after the Disney-style project lit up the silver screen at the Backlot Film Festival in Culver City.

Post: 04/14/08

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2008/04/train-mastercharming-family.html

On the heels of being well-received in the Hollywood film community, "Train Master" was also accepted into the fold at the Kid's First website.

The Kid's First web site reviews a multitude of projects with the specific aim of shedding the spotlight on films suitable for the youth market - and in doing so - have taken a novel approach.

Children at the Kid's First site give a popcorn rating to films they find suitable for viewing by their contemporaries.

Recently, the affable director's film also received the Dove Award seal of approval for family-oriented bill-of-fare!

In 1991,The Dove Foundation began promoting family-friendly entertainment.

Their standards and criteria are based on Judeo/Christian values which are free from the pressures of commercial interests.

"For years we have watched the morals and attitudes of the entertainment industry slowly creep into our society. We maintain that the number of PG-13 and R rated films, with their increasingly salacious material, are not representative of the desires of millions of movie goers."

"It's time for positive family values to impact those in Hollywood instead of Hollywood impacting family values."

Dick Rolfe
Co-Founder & CEO
The Dove Foundation


"Train Master" will be available for rent on May 12th at most Hollywood Video stores.

Good luck with it, Phil!


Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Deep Ellum Arts Festival...Cutting edge Art, scrumptious food & sizzlin' hot music!!!




The Deep Ellum Entertainment district is tossing a big bash this weekend in Dallas (April 3rd thru 5th) and you're all invited!

The free outdoor Arts & Music Festival boasts four stages with non-stop performances by 75 (count 'em) bands from around the country.

And, there will be more than 100 top-notch decorative and visual artists on hand to display their creative wares.

In addition, there will be a pooch parade, streets dancers, and vendors hawking scrumptuous finger foods and beverages.

See 'ya there!

Info: http://www.meifestivals.com/deepspr.html




http://www.julianayrs.com

Friday, March 13, 2009

Matt Lauer...penis envy?


Matt, a suit showing off a little basket is more preferable!


Today show staff traipsed over to the Art Institute one day this past week to try their hand at sketching the human form.

One of the nude male models - strategically set into frame to avoid any "x-rated" footage popping (!) up on camera - allegedly was hung like a horse.

Lauer was asked if he felt intimidated.

"No," he quipped, as his eyes fell to the crotch area of the uninhibited young stud.

"A bit jealous, perhaps."

I expect Matt's subject was "a shower".

Or, just maybe, the young hottie was aroused by Lauer's attentive gaze at his manhood.

Some dudes are into "daddy-types", after all!




http://www.julianayrs.com

Monday, January 26, 2009

Westwood...sculpture imprisoned! Art-lovers kept at bay...

Pablo Picasso sculpture


In a small park in Westwood - just next to the Federal Building - an enticing piece of sculpture beckoned me from afar.

Being a great fan of art in-the-round outdoors, blended in with the natural environment, I strolled over to explore the artist's rendering up-close and personal.

As I drew closer, I was taken aback when I spied a chain-link fence haphazardly erected around the circumference of it.

Odd, that!

A plaque bore an inscription, so I inched closer to peruse it, in the event there was a clue or two as to why the work of art appeared to be out-of-bounds to the art-loving public.

The message was somewhat ironic!

It read:

"Touch and Experience"

Was this some wacko's idea of a sick joke?

Or, just maybe, this was one of Yoko Ono's mind-fu** conceptual art pieces?

In the alternative - just maybe - I was a surprise guest on candid camera and my reactions were being filmed for a side-splitting episode on the subject of modern art!

In that event, I expect I was supposed to play along, climb over the barrier, and touch away.

Get all orgasmic over the enlightening cultural "experience"?

I waited a beat or two, but no camera crew scrambled out from behind the trees or from within any of the roomy SUV's parked on the street nearby.

All in all, it ended up being a rather hollow experience.

Kind of like viewing a Takashi Murakami flat painting!

Henry Moore sculpture

http://www.julianayrs.com

Saturday, January 10, 2009

AFI AWARDS Screenings...Guys & Dolls, WALL-E, Frost/Nixon. Arclight Cinemas! January 11th - 29th...


AFI organizers just e-mailed me a press release to remind me that each year, the AFI AWARDS honor excellence in the moving image arts within the context of a year in review.

"This is the next chapter in AFI's national mandate - specifically - the creation of an annual almanac that records and preserves the evolution of the moving image arts in the 21st century. "

Commencing January 12th thru January 19th, a handful of this year's "best in review" will screen at both the Arclight in Hollywood and Sherman Oaks Galleria respectively.

Screening Schedule

Wednesday January 14th (8 p.m.)

FROST/NIXON
A Q & A with Director Ron Howard will follow the screening.
(Sold out)

Wednesday January 21st (8 p.m.)

WALL-E
A Q & A with Director Andrew Stanton will follow the screening.

Wednesday January 28th

The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
A Q & A with Director Eric Roth will follow the screening.

Thursday January 29th (8 p.m.)

Frozen River
A Q & A will follow with actors Melissa Leo and Misty Upham will follow.

Arclight Cinemas @ Sherman Oaks

Monday January 12th (7:30 p.m.)

On the Town
Classic Olden Golden Goodie with Frank Sinatra

Monday January 19th (7:30 p.m.)

Guys and Dolls
Classic Olden Golden Goodie with Marlon Brando

Monday January 26th (7:30 p.m.)

Singin' in the Rain
Classic Olden Golden Goodie with Gene Kelley

Information: http://www.afi.com/
Tickets:
http://www.arclightcinemas.com/

Footnote
AFI is a national institute providing leadership in screen education and the recognition and advancement of excellence in the art of film, television and digital media.


http://www.julianayrs.com

Thursday, January 8, 2009

Curious Case of Benjamin Button...illogical plot twists! Not for intelligent filmgoers...


At the end of last year, I stumbled across a paper-thin dog-eared copy of "The Great Gatsby", so I opened the front cover and plunged in for a second read.

Frankly, I forgot what a remarkable writer F. Scott Fitzgerald was!

So, when I took in a screening of the adaptation of a lesser-known literary work - "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button" - I was saddened by the convoluted mess I witnessed up on the silver screen!

Granted, the early scenes which moved along at a fast clip, managed to hold the rapt audience (myself included) in their thrall.

And, why not?

After all, intriguing special effects convincingly transformed actor Brad Pitt from a fortyish-male in real life to a gnarly old man in the world of make-believe - and in the creative process - buoyed up the premise of a man moving backwards in time to a credible standard of excellence.

Even when a plot twist hurled Benjamin Button (Pitt) on a tug boat - to toil for a brief stint as a sailor - the project remained afloat at sea.


To some, a clandestine affair with the wife of a Diplomat (Tilda Swinton), may have been a little far-fetched; but, it didn't upset the apple cart in my estimation.

However, Swinton's part amounted to a throw-a-way role, which was annoying.

What a waste of stellar talent on screen!

When "Button" shifted forward and focused the lens on the character's middle years, illogical plot twists flabbergasted me.

Subsequently, the overly-long feature from Paramount & Warner - that a handful of lunatic critics are raving about - ended up all "holes" to me.

For example, although Benjamin was raised in humble surroundings and was an uneducated down-to-earth man - in a revved up second half of the screen oddity - a Brad Pitt fashion show shifted into high gear.

In spite of a lack of foundation, Button is suddenly captured on celluloid jaunting about the globe - by jet, luxury auto, and pristine cabin cruiser - all decked out in what smacks of top-of-the-line Gianni Versace suits and a supporting cast (wardrobe ensembles) that would dazzle even the jaded Duke of Windsor!

Superficial crap!

For a moment, I thought was settling into a shameless segment of a Sydney Sheldon mini-series.
Then, at the heart of the film, the plot zeroed in on a love affair - and subsequent live-in relationship - that Button plunged into with great abandon.

Here, mind-boggling conflicts reared their ugly head for the discerning film buff to ponder incredulous.


For starters, I thought the lead actress - Kate Blanchette - was terribly miscast.

Since the tale is supposed-to hinge on Button's fascination with a mystifying magnetic beauty from his long suffering past, you'd think that the producers would have cast an actress capable of exhibiting those precious qualities.

To me, Blanchett was little more than a cardboard cut-out of the Fitzgerald vision, with mechanical moving parts that propelled her everywhere but in the right direction.

Kate, the bloom is off the rose!

Shortly after a child is born out-of-wedlock, Button is prompted to exit the home life.

Fearing that when he "de"-ages, he'll end up a toddling burden to his mistress and a baffling oddity to the daughter he dotes on (now sprouting into a nubile young creature by-the-minute in the bumpy storyline) Button chooses to roam the high seas.

Ciao, baby!

Now, there are endless shots of Benjamin Button toiling at odd jobs, travelling the highways and byways of the known world, and - on occasion - dashing off the occasional picturesque postcard home.


"Sure wish I could have been there for your first recital," Button whined in one.

"Sorry, I missed the chance," he moaned in another.

What a load of piffle!

When Benjamin Button returned for a visit years later, his buffed bod and mental faculties were still intact.

At this juncture (it was obvious to me, anyway) that Button could have easily attended those first recitals or journeyed home to toast a number of birthdays - even celebrate a special family event or two - before the great "darkness" settled in.

The wanderlust years amounted to beef helper, if you catch my drift.

In the final analysis, the "Curious Case of Benjamin Button" is not a film for the intelligent filmgoer.

No, it's just a lot of eye-candy that ends up leaving a bad taste in the mouth after a - ho hum - predictable ending.

On a scale of 1-10 - 10 being best - Benjamin rates 3 button holes for the snappy designer suit.


Monday, November 17, 2008

American Cinematheque...respected actor Samuel L. Jackson to be honored at tony Black Tie Affair!



Samuel L. Jackson will be honored on December 1st (2008) with the prestigious American Cinematheque Award at an elegant Black Tie soiree at the Beverly Hilton Hotel in tony Beverly Hills.

The coveted prize is presented annually to an extraordinary artist who has contributed significantly to the Art of Filmmaking.

Tickets for the glitzy much-anticipated festivities start at $500 a pop - a bit pricey for some - but I expect that the Hollywood elite will turn out in full force to hob-nob, sip on exotic cocktails, and pay tribute to a talented actor who has the respect of many inside-the-industry and out.

Proceeds from this annual tribute fund the year-round community film programs at the American Cinematheque, the non-profit viewer supported arts organization, that preserves the historic 1922 Egyptian Theatre on Hollywood Boulevard and the 1940 Aero Theatre on Montana Avenue in Santa Monica.

The American Cinematheque's public programming celebrates the art of moving pictures and all of its forms - from the classics - to the American Independents, the latest International Productions, Documentaries, Shorts, Animation, and Experimental projects.

Series are highlighted by screenings of rare works, special prints, and audience discussions with filmmakers.

In the final analysis, Cinematheque is dedicated to preserving the movie-going experience - including, but not limited to - ensuring films are screened on the silver screen as they were originally meant to be seen and heard by movie buffs.


Saturday, November 1, 2008

AFI FEST...Publicity Director John Wildman lashes out! The man is off his rocker...



Yesterday, I penned a post noting a couple of screw-ups that occurred this past week at the AFI Film Fest, due to the incompetence and inexperience of John Wildman and his staff in the publicity department.

In particular, I pointed out that information Mr. Wildman provided to me was incorrect, which resulted in a bit of an uproar in the film community.

For example, Wildman informed me personally that Meryl Streep would not be appearing on the red carpet at the Premiere of "DOUBT" slated for screening on October 30th.

Ms. Streep did stroll down the red carpet the next night, in fact.

Subsequently - I was forced to edit a post to explain the snafu to my readers and film buffs - especially in view of the fact that one AFI supporter (unfamiliar with the facts) blamed me for reporting erroneous information.

In addition, I pointed out in the post that Mr. Wildman's staff provided contact information for Ms. Streep and Joaquin Phoenix which was also incorrect.

In a response communication, Mr. Wildman tried to wiggle out of blame.

For example, he noted for the record that AFI updates information and sometimes get it wrong. (okay!)

Instead of resting his case there, he proceeded to snidely remark:

"But, seriously Joaquin Phoenix? Meryl Streep?"

John, I have copies of the e-mails that confirm my allegations to be true.

Some of the issues he addressed related to my comments about his shoddy set-up at the Roosevelt Hotel.

For example, I noted in my post that when I stopped into the publicity director's office at the Roosevelt on Wednesday to pick up my media badge, it was obvious from the poorly-set-up press headquarters that Wildman and his staff were not only inexperienced but incompetent as well.

His reply?

"I'm a publicity director. Not an interior decorator."

I don't expect you to be, John.

An intelligent "boss" in charge of a department such as yours - with an ounce of experience and know-how - would have simply farmed the task out if they weren't capable of putting together a professional presentation themselves.

It's the details, man!

If Mr. Wildman was a mature individual - with a smaller ego and a bigger IQ - he would have fessed up to his shortcomings without any qualms.

After all, it's not very intelligent or productive to ignore the obvious.

Has the man such little self-awareness?

In the communication he zipped off, without much thought or reflection, he even tried to toss the blame on me.

For example, in a condescending manner, he inferred that I didn't know any better.

After all, her asserted, I was "new".

Ha!

As I noted in a response e mail today, I am certainly not new!

If anything, I am getting long in the tooth.

In fact, I have been involved hands-on in show biz and the film industry - in a myriad of capacities - for over thirty years!

I was in front of the camera when Mr. Wildman was still pooping his drawers!

And, his mother was wiping his snotty little nose.

Oh, but Mr. Wildman had so much more to toss into the fray.

He chirped that I didn't know anything about festivals or how they worked!

Because he has handled a couple, he's suddenly the expert, eh?

Well, I had a big guffaw over that one!

I have been attending and reporting on festivals for years!

I not only know how they work, but why they don't, when they don't.

When a Director at a Film Festival is "pig-headed" - doesn't know who key players are in the industry, and allows an overblown sense of self-importance get the better of him - then it's time to call it a day.

Mr. Wildman concluded his little diatribe by lamenting that I must have had a bad day.

On the contrary, my week was smashing!

In closing, he tried to put a muzzle on me and restrict my right to free speech.

He issued a directive that I focus on the filmmakers.

"They are the story. Not me."

Duh!

As I noted in a follow-up, I don't just report on the films and their makers.

On the contrary!

I also pen commentary on the scuttlebutt - on the red carpet, off of it - and behind-the-scenes.

Don't expect me to wax poetic in a phony puff piece to bolster a star's ego, though.

I may be inclined to throw a spotlight on the AFI FEST, however, and what I perceive as a "clubby" elitist organization run by a handful of snobby individuals who are under the mistaken impression that their sh** doesn't stink.

To cast a blind eye all to that would be a ludicrous notion.

Quentin Tarantino once said:

"I don't believe in elitism. I don't think the audience is this dumb person that is lower than me. I am the audience."


Saturday, October 25, 2008

Roger Ebert...tawdry scandal! Ten lashes with wet noodle...


This past week, Roger Ebert posted a notice on his blog admitting that he did the unthinkable.

Allegedly he wrote a review of a film (Tru Loved) in spite of the fact he only took a peak at about eight minutes of the celluloid footage.

Yes, Ebert's attention span is short! (among other things)


The confession was enough to inspire a feature-length tirade by a staffer by the name of Patrick Goldstein at the Los Angeles Times, who asserted that Ebert's "blunder" would surely spell trouble for film critics.

Baloney!

For starters, Mr. Goldstein is a lousy critic.



On the occasion or two when I chose to struggle through one of his (um) critiques - it was obvious to my artistic sensibilities in about two seconds flat - that his pap not only underscored his lack of writing ability but his ignorance about film, too.


His chock-a-block phrases - and stilted way of expressing himself - signaled he was out to exalt himself (and his name and reputation) at the expense of whoever stood in the way.

For instance, in support of his ludicrous whining, he took a swipe at one of the reviewers in his own daily to elevate his status.

Here's what he had to say about fellow peer Kenneth Turnan.

"After reading Kenny Turnan's dismissal of "Quantum of Solace", one wonders whether Mr. Turan was dozing off during the film's breathtaking action sequences or simply walked out of the screening room after eight minutes, in emulation of Roger Ebert's rude dismissal of a movie earlier this year."

Goldstein is a back stabber, for sure!

True - it was wrong of Ebert to give the impression he caught the whole movie - simply from an ethical standpoint.

Also, patently unfair, when you consider that - bottom line - he didn't give the filmmakers two shakes in the final analysis.

Sometimes a film is a sleeper, starts slow, for instance.

On the other hand, if Mr. Ebert found it to be an impossible "yawn", he should have disclosed that in his review.

"Saw eight minutes of it. Hated it."

Occasionally, reviewers do face dilemmas.

But, a creative mind can fathom a way out of it.

For instance - this past week I caught sight of a couple of reviews on the new Madonna film - "Filth and Wisdom".

One critic hailed it as "naughty and nice".

I thought that Madonna deserved an advance write-up in view of the fact it was her first time out as a director, but since I hadn't screened the film, I could hardly plug it on that basis.

So, I put on my thinking cap!

I quoted a couple of the reviewers - pointed out how promotional blurbs were touting the sexy romp - and made mention of the fact I would attend a screening in the near future.

I remained honest and Madonna got a plug.

Earlier this year - due to a scheduling conflict - I was unable to attend the feature - "Memorial Day" - at a festival in the desert.

Since patrons walked out of the screening outraged - I thought the festival offering should be given some coverage - if only to warn audiences.

So, I interviewed an actress in the movie - in addition to - a handful of theatregoers who attended the premiere.

Hence, I was able to craft an article about the controversy.

In that instance - because of the way I broached the sticky problem - there was no dishonesty whatsoever.

But, getting back to Ebert.

For the most part, I find him to be a competent reliable critic.

On occasion, if he is passionate about a particular actor - or a project - he may be unduly influenced and go overboard.

Just maybe, the rotund little fella will end up with a stick up his butt, too.

In that instance, his opinion can not be trusted.

Funny that!

A few months ago I caught "Beyond the Valley of the Dolls" at one of the local film houses.

Mr. Ebert was given a writing credit on that project.

What a disaster!

I could forgive Ebert for penning such a convoluted piece of trash - which didn't make any sense on any artistic level - in view of the fact the script was written about thirty years ago when he was starting out in a fledgling career.

Go figure - when the film screened at the min-fest - Ebert took the nod as a "sign" from the movie "Gods" (I surmise) that "Beyond" was on its way to cult status.

In fact, on the eve of the screening, he had the audacity to whiz off a telegram to the Festival Director in charge of the proceedings (to be read to the audience that night) in which he lamented that "Beyond" never received its due originally.

Maybe now, he added with gusto, the film would start screening at midnight screenings alongside classics like the Rocky Horror Picture Show.

Well, I laughed!

It was bad enough that Ebert penned such an awful piece of trash - but worse still - to learn that he hasn't wised up to the fact "Beyond" was (and is) a stinker of high order.

What do they say?

Those who can't do, critique?

As to Mr. Goldstein, he should go write copy for brochures or flyers for garage sales.

After all, his contribution to the realm of cinema, is zip!

Thursday, October 2, 2008

LACMA...Masculinity and Sport! Fetish in art?


So, what happens when a group of artists focus their aesthetic eye on a handful of athletes and sports figures?

In - "Hard Targets - Masculinity and Sport - the time-honored arch type of the male athlete as an aggressive, overtly heterosexual, hyper-competitive, and emotionally remote subject has been shifted in an exhibition that opens at LACMA next week.

Opposing views on masculinity and sport (including the rituals and accoutrements that surround the intimate male-dominated world) are insightfully offered up by artists Mark Bradford, Harun Farocki, Brian Jungen, Shaun Leonardo, Collier Schorr, and Joe Sola.


Each artist examines the way masculinity is characterized and performed in a sporting context.

Complex systems of desire that accompany the way society views and consumes athletes and sporting events are explored in the intriguing exhibition, too.

In tandem with the art exhibition, there will be two open dialogues during the course of the show, which runs from October 9th through January 18th at the Hammer Building









In the discussion on - "Talking Hard Targets" - Artists and Historians (Jeff Sheng, Kori Newkirk, Jennifer Doyle and Christopher Bedford) will address how contemporary art engages and disturbs conventional codes of masculinity especially in regard to the athletic imagery.

Bing Theatre October 16th (Free)

"Conversations with the Artists" focuses on New-York based artist Collier Schorr who will speak with LACMA's assistant curator of Contemporary Art (Christopher Bedford) about "performances within performances and the dualities in movement and gesture".

The subject alludes to ranges of masculine emotions and expressions, according to Mr. Schorr, and should prove to be an enlightening discussion.

Bing Theatre October 10th (Free)

This exhibition was organized by the Los Angeles County Museum of Art and made possible by Nike Sportswear and the Contemporary Projects Endowment Fund. Contributors also included Vidal Sassoon, Steve Martin, and the Broad Art Foundation.

Monday, September 22, 2008

Who Does She Think She Is?...documentary on female artists resonates! Santa Monica International Film Festival...


One of the highlights of the Santa Monica International Film Festival was a screening of the documentary - Who does she think she is? - directed by talented filmmaker Pamela Tanner Boll.

In this foray into the realm of women - and the pursuit of their other-worldly dreams - Ms. Tanner Boll has managed to capture the spirit of five bold women who are achieving success in their artistic endeavours in spite of the challenging odds.

Women have been told they have to choose career or mothering.

Why can't they do both?


In her documentary, her camera trails her subjects, as they face their daily demons and strive for a balance between the two aspects of split personas.

Early on - as a young woman - Boll fiercely pursued her own artistic goals courageously, but gave up the creative dream briefly.

"I wanted to find 'the guy'," she stated matter-of-fact to a rapt audience who warmed to her project when it screened this past weekend at the Martin Luther King Theatre.

Toll worried about ending up alone, like a celebrated few.

"I didn't want to be single. Or, end up committing suicide."

Down the line - the articulate intelligent director - found her own "soul mate", fortunately.

But, that was not the case with a couple of the women she focused her insightful lens on.

One artist faced an impasse in her marriage when she refused to give up her goal of succeeding as an artist.

In a spirited conversation one day her husband lamented.

"I want a wife."

"I want a wife, too," she responded without hesitation.

Understandably, the two parted ways.

Janice Wunderlich, a sculptor featured in the project, was one of the lucky ones.

Her husband and children support her creative endeavors wholeheartedly. And, the family takes delight in the fact her novel sculptures are being snapped up by collectors around the country at major art exhibitions.

Besides the issue of a home life, and mothering, the filmmaker also takes a gander at the challenges female artists face landing access into the hallowed halls of the great art institutions around the U.S. and elsewhere.



It's not only difficult to make a living, one talented artist confessed, but tough to gain respect in the gallery scene.


The percentages are staggering.

Without exception, major art galleries and government-funded museums, tend to lean towards the exhibition and purchase of major works by leading male artists.

Yes, female painters, sculptors, sketch artists - what-have-you - constantly struggle for recognition among their peers.

Through my own experience as an artist, I have been galled by the fact that many dealers looked upon the renderings of my female artist friends as mere "arts and crafts", "Sunday painting", or not-to-be-taken seriously.

One fan of the documentary put it quite succinctly.

"Who Does She Think She Is? tells the story of ordinary women who pursue their calling - at a price - but for whom art has the power to transform their lives, and perhaps ours, into a deeper experience of living."

The film was produced by Mystic Artists in collaboration with the Wellesley Centers for Women and is available online in a DVD format at Pamela Tanner Boll's website.

Info: http://www.whodoesshethinksheis.net

Thursday, September 18, 2008

Lars and the Real Girl...Ryan Gosling in compelling drama! Writer wins "Humanitas Prize"...


In reviewing "Lars and the Real Girl", one critic referred to the project as a love story, but the assessment is misleading.

Through the grapevine, you probably got a whiff of the synopsis for the film.

A shy young man - played expertly by Ryan Gosling - falls in love with an anatomically correct doll he mail-orders from the Internet.

Then, Lars proceeds to introduce the young lady - Bianca - to family and a circle of friends and co-workers as his girlfriend.

Early on, as the story quickly unfolds, it's apparent that Gosling's character is using the "dummy" to bridge an inadequacy while maintaining a grip on reality at the same time.

For example, in spite of the fact the whole idea of a love affair with a manufactured doll seems way out in left field, Gosling's charming character quickly conjures up a support system to protect his imaginary little world.

For example, he quickly figures into the scenario a "wheelchair" to get Bianca around; after all, in the inner-most recesses of his mind, it's obvious that a non-living companion without flesh and blood, cannot walk.

Here, we have the opportunity to glimpse the fascinating machinations of the mind - and witness what its complex reasoning and problem-solving skills are capable of - in the most awkward and unusual circumstances.

This is undoubtedly due to the fact that writer - Nancy Oliver - wrote an insightful compelling script which was just awarded a Humanitas Prize this past week (shared with Ronald Harwood of "The Diving Bell) which honored her for "exploring the human condition and revealing common humanity".

Indeed, the subject matter is handled with good taste and surprising sensitivity; for instance, the segments where Bianca becomes ill resonate deeply and are thought-provoking, at best.

In fact, the tale turns down an intriguing path at this juncture in the film.

A local physician (also a psychologist) treats Bianca under the guise that Lars' companion is the focus of medical care- when, in fact - the "wise old owl" is using the occasion to surreptitiously observe her true patient, Lars.

The functional role is played with understated simplicity by Patricia Clarkson, who turns in an affecting crisp performance, which is right on the money.

The town's people are in on the "skinny" and treat Bianca like a real person.

Initially, the townsfolk react in a classic way: in disgust, with surprise, and full of curiosity!

It stretches one's credulity a bit, though, to imagine that in a small red-neck town - the guys would warm up to the idea and forgo on any taunting of Lars about what appears to be a "fetish", though.

In one humorous moment, one stud retorts:

"Heh, a woman that doesn't talk back, I want one!"

Of course, if you think that the message is that women are expendable: wrong!

In the closing scenes, the underlying theme is underscored, quite explicitly.

There is no substitute for the real thing!

Hence, the title, "Lars and the Real Girl".

You'll figure it out.