.:[Double Click To][Close]:.
Showing posts with label Blogosphere. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Blogosphere. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

The Tattler...featuring Blogs! Submissions, please...



If you're like moi, you probably have very little time during the course of the day to cruise the Internet, and take a gander at popular new blogs that are revving up - and subsequently - piquing widespread interest out in the wilds of the blogosphere.

On the other hand, perhaps you're an talented insightful blogger with a lot to chirp about.

In spite of the fact you've been toiling away publishing those sizzling posts at the crack of dawn each day, nobody is nibbling at the smorgasbord of delectable goodies you've been tossing their way.

The musings - like zillions of others out there - are going virtually unread.

Meanwhile, the popular "with-it" blog trend-setters, are continuing to make their merry way into dizzying social circles in a big way.

Maybe it's time to pack it in?

Nope!

Now, you have a chance to enter the big leagues, and become a celebrated hit-getter like gossip maven Perez Hilton or the undisputed Queen of the "blogs" Arianna Huffington.

Yes, the Tattler is expanding its horizons, and reaching out into the blogosphere!

Our high-profile website is setting aside a little premium space (!) in order to showcase - and ultimately thrust into the spotlight - a handful of bloggers who deserve a kick-start and a few kudos along the way.

So, if you're a blogger pining for a little more exposure - and aching to be a much-celebrated "Featured Blog" at the Tattler - just zip off an e-mail off to us when you have a mind to.

Contact:

publisher@thetattler.biz

A simple link to your blog to facilitate a quick review of your creative renderings is satisfactory.

However, if you include a brief bio with a couple of insightful (and/or heartfelt) notes on your - hopes, dreams, and wishes - may trigger a profile piece alongside your blog site entry.

Good luck!


Wednesday, November 26, 2008

Bloggers...thank you for your support! And, have a Happy Thanksgiving...


Since I hooked up with wordpress, I have been able to keep better track of my blog stats - and subsequently - determine what kind of activity is going on in respect to my daily posts.

Frankly, it has been quite heartening to discover these past few weeks that numerous bloggers have either "quoted" my comments on their sites or installed direct links to posts they have been keen on.

Not unlike me, many bloggers painstakingly struggle over their message - with a keen eye to the turn-of-a-phrase - before posting.

Then, after the little gem is published, most wonder to themselves.

Is anyone ever going to stumble on this post - and just maybe - read the material I slaved over?

Fortunately, when I step out the door, I get an immediate reaction to my musings!

When I waltz into a restaurant, or stroll down the street - even step into a crowded Hollywood nightclub - all eyes turn toward me.

"That's him," they whisper, "The famous blogger."

Nonetheless, the support I have received over the past few months, has been quite heartening.

Daily, I receive private e-mail messages about some novel or thought-provoking idea or two, bloggers pine to pass on.

Many are inclined to post a comment on the blog sites, too.

Since I started up my first blog over a year ago on the Fox Network TV Website ("On the Lot") my first-hand experience in the blogosphere has been about ninety-five percent positive!

Occasionally, I do get some wacko spouting off at the mouth, but rarely.

Also, through a glass darkly, I have had the chance to get a glimpse into the psyche of a handful of twisted individuals around the country.

For instance, one day I penned a post after a red carpet premiere in Hollywood, in which I noted that Jeff Goldblum was very kind on the eve of the screening.

Shortly after that, I stumbled across a screwball comment, that some Goldblum fan made on their blog.

The individual, who acted like they owned Mr. Goldblum, referenced my article in which I underscored the actor's good manners.

Rather than just link the story, or say thanks, he proceeded to make a negative remark.

"I LOL! We already knew that. It's too late."

Too late?

Since when is it too late to compliment a person on their exemplary conduct?

Notwithstanding, people do change over time.

Personalities (especially in the spotlight) are often in flux.

A few years ago, an actor may have been a mean scoundrel who spit in the face of the press; but today, they may be meek as a lamb.

Also, new fans are always coming into the fold every day.

For their sake, isn't it a good idea to mention how approachable the object of their admiration is?

Oftentimes, I run into twisted people with no common sense whatsoever, either.

For instance, recently I wrote up a post on an e-mail I received which was a satire on Obama's speech patterns.

However, when I originally penned the post, no credit had been attributed to the original writer in the e-mail I secured the hilarious material from.

One day I was cruising the net when I located the article with a credit to the original author.

Instead of just "lifting" the name of the individual, I actually spent a few moments to thank the blogger for including the author's name, so I could give the comedian professional credit in my own post.

Wasn't that the appropriate professional action to take under the circumstances?

The blogger in question proceeded to read the post - and due to an obvious lack of intelligence or abililty to read and comprehend English - summarily twisted and distorted my intentions in such a convoluted way that it boggled the mind!

The lady (who posts anonymously and uses a photo of Raquel Welch to represent herself online) proceeded to post a negative comment about me!

In contrast, any intelligent sensible person would have recognized my obvious thoughtfulness and professionalism.

Talk about wacko!

More recently, a couple of individuals attempted to post negative comments on my blog in response to my expose on Richard Raddon in recent days.

Since the posts were written anonymously - and were traced back to the LA Film Festival site - it was obvious to me that a person in support of Raddon was involved in some all-out skulduggery on his behalf!

Needless to say, I zapped their comments into oblivion.

What am I thankful for this turkey day?

To be blessed with the precious good fortune of having readers at my blog sites who are like-minded, sound in intelligence, and of good heart.

Happy Thanksgiving, eh?

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

New York Times...blogsters up in arms over Emily Gould exposed (gawker.com) coverage!

Would the real Emily Gould step forward, please...


A brouhaha has built to a fever pitch over the past few days since the reputable New York Times Magazine (Sunday Edition) posted a cover story (a confessional essay) written by former gawker.com blogster - Emily Gould.

One commentator lamented the angst of the many,

"How can it be that such vapid foolishness be accorded the importance of a cover piece in the Times Magazine," Leo Dymkoski (?) raged in an obvious snit.

L.M. - ("lips moving", perhaps?) - demanded that the newsies at the top dog media outlet in New York City,

"Please stop embarrassing our generation with mindless prattle."

The flood of mostly negative comments poured into the portal so fast and furious - that the NYT's response forum was overwhelmed. Webmasters temporarily froze the discussion launch 'til they were able to clear a staggering backlog.

In the aftermath of the seismic quake that shook - not stirred - the blogs around the globe, Critics and media analysts hastened their plumming of the mystical depths for answers to "what just happened" - and concluded the musings were obviously more profound than "vagaries of internet micro-celebrity".


In one unsuspecting moment - a quiet "green light" for an off-beat feature - managed to unwittingly tap a vein of "media-world animus" lurking in the shadows, previously uncharted (or even imagined).

To some, Ms. Gould was simply narcisstic.

To others, self-absorbed.

Others lambasted the redcoat for "unapologetically pursuing a kind of reportage that featured her as the main character in every story and the people around her as supporting actors."

A reporter in the LA TIMES rubbed salt in the wound when he expressed the view that, "...thanks to the Internet, this kind of performance journalism - where the writer is her own subject - is gaining ground."

Well, that may be a bit harsh.

In some quarters, a blog is simply a new-fangled "diary", that spits out and sets adrift scratchy thoughts daily - left alone thereafter to pitch on their lonesome - on the tumultous waves of the media sea.

As to the issue of positioning one in the piece?

Well, in view of the myriad number of news outlets clawing about in the blogosphere just now, I surmise it behooves a writer to personalize a story - tell it from an intimate point of view - on occasion.

Otherwise - blog features drawing on the same tired old sources leveraged to all ad nauseam - would end up on the world-wide-web sorry tales - all carbon copies of each other.

Notwithstanding, irate readers in this instant scenario have another option. Why waste valuable grey matter sweating over such an insignificant tawdry issue?

Especially in view of the fact that to some,

"There is no such thing as bad publicity."

I disagree, but I'm probably in the minority in that regard.

Personally, I'd prefer to be bestowed with the prestigious honor of recognition in my chose field of endeavour, in a more dignified - rarefied light - when it comes to my moment in the sun.

In fact, a handful of bloggers accused the author of tyranical machinations, pointed the finger for fanning the flames for the sake of celebrity.

That is a far cry from penning an article innocently - or from the heart - then being hit by a tidal-wave of media attention in spite of the fact no bait was offered up seeking that end.

The former probably deserves the disgust of the madding crowd.



I was amused when one journalist inferred that Ms. Gould had broken some kind of code of ethics - pooh-poohed proper etiquette - or a blogger rule or regulation.



Is there a forbidden line in what one labeled - the peep-holed-filled boundaries of the Internet between the public and the private - where one dare not tread?

If so, then let's cut to the chase.

Is there a guide blog freshmen - or Internet newbies - can turn or subscribe to in a good-faith effort to fathom the social-political mores to adhere to...so that one may plot their musings to subtly jive with the axis of the Internet and its intricate myriad mysteries?

The dictionary has yet to list "blog" or "blogger" within the pages of their sacred march of words. Indeed, the internet - and its inhabitants - have yet to be fully defined literally or in a legally significant context. Go figure!

In my mind's eye, the Internet has the potential to be a thrilling adventure - "into the wild" and the "untamed" - and a virutal freewheeling territory ( a new frontier) - where the adventurous may be beckoned at a whim to explore - unhindered by the sluggish, prudish, high-strung few - who lack the intelligence, imagination, or vision to embrace it.

Let's not silence a voice because we don't warm up to the message it's transmitting.

Instead, apply the meaning of an old familiar phrase,

"Consider the source"

Then move on, unspoiled by the rude interruption.

Gloved ones gave gawker blogster the finger...