.:[Double Click To][Close]:.
Showing posts with label Internet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Internet. Show all posts

Friday, July 8, 2011

Criss Angel...launches portal on Internet! Magic Jam talk show!







On the heels of "kissing and making up" with Perez Hilton (the volatile twosome were at each other's throats in a nasty bitch fight for the past two years) Criss Angel debuted his spanking-new web site which focuses on all-things hokus-pokus.

Magic, dudes!

According to the sexy stud with the expert slight-of-hand, fourteen programs are in development at the novel portal.

Angel also hosts a talk-show titled "Magic Jam".

Las Vegas mainstays - such as Siegfried & Roy and Lance Barton - are slated to trot out into the hot seat in the near future to the delight of their fans!

But, I have one bone to pick with Criss.

As Columbo would say:

"Just one more thing."

Mr. Angel should consider a more original catch phrase to promote his magical spectacular (ad)venture.

"This is the future and the future is now" lacks originality - don't 'ya think - folks?

Stay posted for updates!

http://www.thetattler.biz




Sunday, May 1, 2011

Julian Ayrs...Internet site Badoo pimping for me! Pays to Google yourself!


 

Photos of Julian






 

What a hoot!

Today, I was searching the Internet, when I stumbled on a dating site that mentioned moi!

When I clicked on the link, I was magically whisked to a dating site, that hooks singles up.

Uh-huh!

The webmaster hi-jacked my photograph from MySpace and signed me up without my knowledge or permission.

Now, I am a sought-after bachelor in cruise mode on the world-wide-web, I guess.

The date meisters were even thoughtful enough to cast a wide hook out for me.

Apparently, I am seeking a female 31 - 50 years of age.

Yeah, luv those old cougars, dudes!

For good times and sizzling hot sex between-the-sheets I gather!

And, get this, there appears to be over 3 million members to choose from at the Badoo site!

If you want my stats, though - gee whiz - you're going to have to sign up for the "free"dating service.

Gosh, I feel like bait, a piece of meat!

A poster boy for forty-something studs on the prowl.

Well, good thing I was in a horny mood today - and chose to google myself - or I would never have clued into the fact that I am among the ranks of the most sought after commodity in the enterprising (and romantic) coupling trade.

Just betcha, a Royal betrothal is my cards, too!

For a "Best Man" - either Wills or randy Prince Harry - will do.

I wonder if I will get a percentage of the spoils, royalties, and that sort-of-thing?

Or, do I have to take it out in flesh, or by trade?

Reply in confidence to:

http://badoo.com/01144819558/






New Internet persona!
(nip & tuck here & there does wonders)

Saturday, October 16, 2010

DONATIONS






 DONATIONS
&
STORY SUGGESTIONS


BACKGROUND INFO
ON
JULIAN AYRS & THE TATTLER


For approximately three years, the Tattler has been publishing informative features on the Internet (which I trust have been enlightening too) under the auspices of google's highly-ranked forum:

http://www.blogspot.com/

Just prior to the rewarding stint on the far-reaching www - after a ten-year writer’s block - I got my feet wet “blogging” (an icky term I despise) on a Fox website the top brass at the underdog Network set up to complement an innovative reality show - “On the Lot” - which focused on filmmakers in competition for prizes each week.

Though Fox’s foray into the snobby realms of film was short-lived, the heady hands-on experience (and subsequent publicity that followed in its wake) garnered me a lot fame (and notoriety) nonetheless.

The daily reports ran the gamut from titillating Hollywood gossip, to controversial social commentary, relaxing travel and leisure suggestions, the environmental issues, even a calendar of community events.

CONTRIBUTIONS

Now, regular readers of the Tattler (and visitors who sporadically cruise by the site) may get more actively involved by submitting a story idea to the Editor for consideration.


In the alternative, supporters may pledge their support with a cash donation to help defray the costs involved with publishing daily posts at "The Tattler" blog where the truly free creative spirit reins.

CONTACT

Story Suggestions


Attention
Julian Ayrs
Editor & Publisher


i.julian@blogspot.com


Donations

Pay Pal or Snail Mail

Pay Pal

(online payments)

Payee
Julian Ayrs


http://www.ijulian.blogspot.com

Snail Mail
(checks)

Attention
Julian Ayrs
Editor & Publisher
The Tattler
8424 Santa Monica Blvd.
Suite No. A251
West Hollywood, CA
90069
USA


Friends, countrymen, Bloggers!





Sunday, October 3, 2010

COICA...Senators move for Internet blacklists! End to free speech on web!







A group of Senators with clout on both sides of the political fence are rallying to expand the Government's authority to censor the Internet.

The "Combating Online Infringement & Counterfeits Act" was slyly presented to law-makers in late September - and according to insiders on-the-hill - is ready to rock 'n roll.

First up on the agenda?

A hearing before the Judiciary Committee.

Opponents are crying foul on the grounds that U.S. Citizens may soon find themselves joining Iranians and Chinese in the hapless ranks of those being blocked from accessing broad chunks of the public Internet.

COICA, if enacted, would create two blacklists consisting of Internet domain names.

The Courts would be granted the power to add sites to the first COICA enforcementlist ; the Attorney General, control over a second.

Internet service providers and others (everyone from Comcast to PayPal to Google AdSense) would be required to block any domains on the first list.

The entities would also receive immunity (and the presumed good favor of the government) if they also blocked domains on the second list.

The lists are for sites "dedicated to infringing activity".

For example, any domain name where counterfeit goods or copyrighted material are "central to the activity of the Internet site" could be blocked.

If you read between the lines, under current U.S. Law, pop culture sites like - YouTube - could be censored because US. Copyright holders like Viacom have argued that copyrighted material is central to their activity.

YouTube is perfectly legal - currently - as long as they take down copyrighted material when they're informed about the Violation.

If COICA passes, critics are concerned that Viacom wouldn't need to prove "wrong-doing" by YouTube to shut the site down.

Lawyers would only have to persuade the courts that a significant number of people were using the "YouTube" web-site to infringe on copyrights.

Failing that road of pursuit, Viacom could petition the DOJ to put the social hub on the second blacklist, and encourage ISPs to block it even without a court order.

According to opponents, ISPs have ample reason to abide by the will of the powerful DOJ, even if the law doesn't formally require them to do so.

In the final analysis, COICA's passage may be a tremendous blow to free speech on the Internet.

Those who are opposed to that end scenario, therefore, need to sit up and take action.



Friday, October 1, 2010

The Social Network...Facebook & Nerd revenge! Tawdry tale about friends!









The idea is the thing.

And - for the creatively-minded - they tend to be a dime-a-dozen.

Such is the blessed curse bestowed on society's true artists and visionaries.

What to do, when there is no creative well, to draw on?

The unscrupulous steal the commodity, by diabolical means if necessary, natch.

And so, with this in mind, the tawdry tale of the Facebook phenomenon unfolds on the luminous silver screen in all its conivving, deceitful, under-handed, back-stabbing detail.

In this intense, well-written drama by Aaron Sorkin, the audience is treated to a modern-day tragedy where friends are just numbers, clicks all-powerful, and betrayal a sweet revenge in Silicon Valley best served up cold on an internet browser.

And what transpires along the insightful journey?

A celebrated nerd (Mark Zuckerberg) - once-lauded for allegedly drumming up the Facebook concept  - is exposed for the worm that he is and his worthy ethical-minded adversaries exonerated.

What a morality tale!

The Social Network is slick, powerful, and bang-on - particularly in respect to  its depiction of  the misguided (troubled) student body of this era - who crave recognition (and acceptance) from their peers at whatever cost.

For Zuckerberg it was a lesson in the ironies of life.

Although he would eventually rustle up 500 million facebook members on websites around the globe, he ended up a lonely billionaire, unable to fathom the true nature of friendship.

Undoubedly, that is why Facebook has turned out to be the most superficial social network on the Internet.


Zuckerberg & Napster creator!

http://www.thetattler.biz/

Thursday, September 2, 2010

San Francisco...Mayor Newsom's cheap 45 minute free Wi-Fi a joke!





Gadfly Mayor Newsom!




The thin-as-a-rail snake-oil-salesman - that is the one-and-only Mayor of San Francisco - is quite a piece of work.

Channel surf a smidgen when visiting the fair city by the Bay, and nine times out-of-ten, tourists will stumble on his likeness on a local cable outlet spouting off about this 'n that.

Any day now, I expect Mayor Newsom will be pitching for a reality show, to boost his image to voters around the State of California.

One of Newsom's claims to fame unfolded - when he took a stab at introducing the high-stakes world of Wi-Fi technology by offering up free Internet Access to savvy world-class travellers and common Joe's alike as they glided through the San Francisco airport daily.

At press junkets, His Honor patted himself on the back for lauching the SFO endeavour.

But, when tourists plunk themselves down for a stint at the laptop, it's apparent that Newsom leaves a lot to be desired in the credibility department.

At a time when most high-end coffee shops like Starbucks (McDonald's McCafe, too) are providing unlimited free Wi-Fi access to the thronging masses on-the-go - a splash box at the SFO site notes that the internet access is provided for a paltry forty-five minutes or so - before the plug gets pulled.

What if there is a flight delay?

Or, unexpected stormy weather back east strands loved ones in a snow drift on the tarmac somewhere?

How will the messages get back-and-forth to soothe the fears once the Wi-Fi goes kaput?

If 'ya ask me, the Mayor is a cheap skate!

Notwithstanding, I have to admit that the futuristic environs of the San Francisco Airport, are not half-bad when it comes to coolin' the heels for an hour or so.

If a traveller cruises into SFO on Bart, they are quickly wowed by eye-catching aesthetic surroundings that smack of a futurisic city.

One mural, abreast of an escalator, appears to be a shimmering green-inspired water-fountain - when, in fact - it is actually a clever artist's rendering that facilitates sheer fabric to fool even the keenest eye unless inspected up-close.

A monrail (featuring red & blue lines) - automated - whisks the upwardly mobile to a handful of terminals where they are quickly ushered to their destinations at airline counters, shuttle bus service centers, or well-wishers at curbside.

Throughout the lightweight facility - graced with soaring skylights and soothing interior reliefs - there is a lot of "greenery" which appeals to the human sensibilities.

Here, travel has become a fanciful foray into the welcome unknown, and no longer remains the dreary prospect that it was once in unimaginative eras of yesteryear when the concept of travel was all about practicality and utilitarian civic service.

Thank Newsom and the City Fathers for that much, at least!





Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Advertisments..."on demand delivery" changes landscape! Business booming!



Shortly after you hop onto the Internet, undoubtedly a barrage of unwanted pop-up ads will splash onto your laptop screen to contend with - touting exciting products for impotency (Viagra), feminine hygiene (tampax), colon cleansers - you name it.

Browsers have the option of  blocking  'em out, but that course of action may prevent legitimate dialogue boxes from gracing the screen at a myriad of popular web sites frequented throughout the course of the day.

Fortunately, some clever software developer has rustled up a clever "on line delivery" program capable of sorting through the ads to tailor a selection of the free-floating devils to meet your unique tastes and interests.

Once installed, only blurbs for the desired products will slip through the filter, and splash across the screen.

For web site owners - who acknowledge that ad revenue is of paramount importance to remain in business - the trend gives 'em the jitters.

But, not to worry, since there is good news along with the bad

Unlike a few years ago (remember the dot com bust?) the advertising sector of the business community is now burgeoning.

In fact, analysts in the field expect revenue to rise at least 12 percent in the next year or two.

"The net is fast-becoming a billion-dollar business that is a force to reckon with," one researcher asserted.

Personally, I used to prefer the Tattler web site to be pure and "ad-free".

But, revenue is important to keep the endeavour prospering, so I have relented somewhat.

Even still, I tend to choose advertisements that fit well with the design of the site, full of rich media that enchances.

Just - classy eye-catching visuals for the Tattler - please!

Plain text static adverts don’t cut it for me.

Even still, ads fathomed up in a myriad of creative ways, are proliferating on the Internet and netting big bucks.

Now, if only mainstream America, would take a cue!
 
 

Sunday, July 4, 2010

Starbucks...stuck-up bit**es don't help business! Paradise road barista bad news...







Well, when the news hit the fan this past week, cheers went up around the country.

No more contracts with AT & T, or need to secure a Wi-Fi provider, when slipping into Starbucks for a hot java and toasted bagel at the crack of dawn.

Uh-huh!

The head honchos at the Seattle-based "mover-and-shaker" in the coffee bean marketplace confirmed that - henceforth - Wi-Fi service would be provided "gratis".

Tongues wagged that Starbucks felt threatened - not only by McDonalds recent introduction of Starbuck's-style java delights to their McCafe menu - but their decision to provide free Internet access too (which prompted the change of policy).

In spite of their desperate bid to prevent their market share from shrinking, suits at Starbucks - as usual - failed to conduct a thorough assessment of the situation.

For example, what good is the lure of free Wi-Fi, if Baristas are rude and insulting to the customers?

Yup!

Service with a smile at Starbucks has gone by way of the dinosaur.

From my perch, it appears that the low-paid workers - who hold jobs that were once (but no longer) envied - are not unlike green-eyed monsters with their noses up against the candy-store window.

The goodies are within reach, but they can't get their grubby hands on 'em.

Without doubt, some of these low-lifes - with all the personality of a worm - are jealous of the upwardly mobile customers who patronize their establishment.

On occasion - because of it - they seize on opportunities to insult the clients.

For instance, at the Paradise & Flamingo Starbucks outlet in Las Vegas, one huffy Barista (with bad skin, an attitude to match, and about to turn 21 she boasts) is continually off-putting with her holier-than-thou attitude.

She treats patrons like they should be flattered by her presence!

One regular was in the midst of a small meditation - as he waited for the laptop to fire up - when the snarky gal strode by and barked out a command.

"No sleeping here!"

Huh?

The startled guest responded by noting that they were meditating for a moment (to get centered).

Without skipping-a-beat, she rudely shot back an insulting remark.

"Looked like sleeping to me," she spat at the guest in an acid tongue.

Honey, you don't know your a** from a hole in the ground to begin with!

Cold frigid bitches are a dime-a-dozen, by the way, so wise-up.

If you can't be polite and provide service in a prompt professional courteous manner, it's obviously time to move on to sweeing streets or cleaning out toilets.

From where I sit, it appears that even that lowly task may be beyond your capability.

Starbucks executives - wake up - and smell the coffee.

Rude, insulting, classless employees are running your business into the ground.

Free Wi-Fi and McMuffin-style breakfast snacks won't save you.



Image of Corporate Greed!

Saturday, July 3, 2010

Starbucks...free Wi-Fi for all! Breathing down McDonalds neck...





A roar of approval was voiced across the land this week when Starbucks headquarters announced that all Wi-Fi service will now be "gratis" at the upscale cafe outlets around the country.

Undoubtedly, the switch in policy was - in part - due to the fact that in recent days McDonalds has been stealing some of Starbucks' thunder on the competitive java terrain.

Last year, McDee's introduced their McCafe line of specialty coffees at lower cost, for instance.

Then, earlier this year, the No. 1 fast-food take-out-joint introduced free Wi-Fi to their down-to-earth customers who appeared to care more about - burgers, fries, and big gulps - than they do about free access to the Internet.

Indeed, on the past few occasions that I have patronized McDonalds in California and Nevada, I haven't spied many taking advantage of the twin arches generous WiFi offer.

One problem?

In spite of the fact McDee's  has rovided the free Wi-Fi service nationwide, they have yet to install enough "electrical outlets" to lure in more upscale patrons along the lines of those who frequent Starbucks.

Uh-huh!

The McDee's I am sitting in right now in the Mojave Desert only has one wall plug to facilitate powering up when the battery is low.

Stingy bast**ds!

No matter.

McDonalds is a far cry from the ambience that Starbucks offers anyhoo!

For good reason.

How many savvy internet users could tolerate the endless stream of McDee's counter persons screaming out at the top of their lungs ad nauseam.

"Order 32! Sausage Biscuit with Cheese! Senior Coffee!"

Even still, I applaud the fast-food-chain for forcing Starbucks' hand.

As to whether there will be any available seats in Starbucks henceforth - in view of the welcome turn-of-events - that's an entirely different matter altogether to ponder.

News at 11!


Tuesday, May 4, 2010

Blogger...ripe for kill!






The other evening I was cruising the net when I spied a link to a story titled:

"Bloggers not Journalists"

I chuckled to myself, then browsed on, without even checking out the tripe.

For good reason!

No doubt, a million or so bloggers, had already torn the arrogrant sh** into itsy-bitsy little pieces and fed 'em to the fishes.


Sunday, April 25, 2010

Blogging...artist's multi-media-rich canvas! Art reflects times...






All of my life I have been an artist - so, of course - I have the temperament.

Whenever I create a painting or a piece of writing I do so with the intent of making a statement.

After all, art should reflect the times we are living in.

The role of the artist is to teach and enlighten and inspire.

With the advent of the internet and its subsequent popularity - and the development of nifty multi-media-rich blog sites - a new canvas sprang forth which was perfect for my own talents.

For example, my flair for - design, graphics, and color - could be applied to craft an eye-catching aesthetically-pleasing web site that exalted my own sense of style.

Unlike a book that may take a year or two to publish - there is an immediacy to blog posts, too - which has widespread appeal.

When it comes to social and political issues, a blog is a great way to get the word out fast, to the multitudes.

During the process, hopefully, a blogger will be able to raise the consciousness.

Initially, folks were up-in-arms and raged about the legitimacy of blogging.

To some, bloggers who penned articles on hard news - the election, profiles on public figures, social ills, etc. - were somehow not legit.

Journalists early on complained that bloggers didn't have the professional training - and that their lack of ethical standards - tended to throw a wild card into the mix.

Then, as newspaper sales plummeted - and bloggers started to rustle up some clout on the Internet - the dailies sat up and took notice.

Today, most journalists with major newspapers, have blogs that are universally accepted.

Bloggers have not only risen above the adversity in media circles, but are often quoted today, as reliable sources.

I have found that the lowly masses - at times - still shake their heads, though.

If a blogger writes an informative well-researched tell-all  piece - that happens to be controversial in nature - more often-than-not they get lambasted.

“Who do these bloggers think they are,” is the common lament heard across the land.

I pen my thoughts on the human condition - report on what I perceive all around me - and offer up a commentary on occasion.

I’m no different than a mainstream journalist who boasts a daily column in a high-profile publication.

When Andy Rooney spouts off on 60 minutes - no one questions his authority - or right to express his point of view.

Fox pundits hurl outrageous barbs (and half-truths) and no one bats an eye!

“Oh, that’s just Fox,” folks slyly wink.

Even the outlandish screaming headlines in the exploitative tabloids - grocery market fodder at the check-out line - are considered the norm (nothing to pooh pooh).

But, if a blogger does it?

The truth of the matter is that many get slammed.

I say, every forum has its merits and degrees of legitimacy.

So, I am no different than any other media outlet at the Tattler, in the final analysis.

I may take a pot shot at a store that rips people off, focus on a celebrity gaining notoriety, or toss a searing spotlight a news event that has taken the country by storm.

Or, simply muse on day-to-day events that touch people.

The Tattler's slogan is aptly titled:  A Slice of Life.

As far as I am concerned, that's my job, my lot in life (as an artist).

Just recently I was thrilled to hear a major film director point out to an interviewer that in film school, his professor hammered into his students, that every human being has a story worth telling.

It is an artist’s duty to makes sense of it - and tell it from their unique point of view - he noted in so many words.

I agree wholeheartedly.

Daily, my dramas and light-hearted adventures, unfold on my blog.

Judging by the numbers (hits) quite a few people are either educated, entertained , or downright intrigued by what I have to say.

As a mainstream alternative, I do pretty well!

And, what of the critics?

If I am not your cup of tea, then surf on to the next site.

Good riddance!

Ultimately, the Tattler is geared toward sophisticated intelligent individuals, who have a keen sense about Literature, and the role that the artist plays in the modern day.

Now,  if I could only get down to writing that Great Canadian Novel!

Carl Jung once said:

"Art is a kind of innate drive that seizes a human being and makes him its instrument. To perform this difficult office it is sometimes necessary for him to sacrifice happiness and everything that makes life worth living for the ordinary human being."


Monday, April 12, 2010

Internet Neutrality...court ruling favors Comcast, Verizon & AT&T...









The U.S. Court of Appeals overturned a 2008 order issued on behalf of the FCC which forced Comcast to curtail network management maneuvers aimed at BitTorrent and P-to-P users.

In their ruling, the Justices - in a 3 to 1 vote - opined that the FCC lacked any “statutory mandated responsibility” to enforce network neutrality rules.

Industry insiders perceive the decision as a setback for the FCC.

“Today’s court decision means that nobody has the authority to stop the Nation’s broadband providers from interfering with the consumers’ online activities,” noted Robb Topolski, Chief technologist for the Open Technology Institute.”

In the final analysis, Comcast can block a customer’s access to  applications, Verizon can change the behavior of DNS and change which web pages the user sees, AT & T can  censor streaming media and block free speech (!), Charter can invade a user's  privacy for the purposes of advertising, and Windstream can redirect Google searches to its own search engine.

A scary turn of events!

I trust that for the sake of Internet users the world-over, that the ruling will be appealed all the way to the Supreme Court, if necessary.



Friday, April 9, 2010

Facebook...eyes Chinese Internet market!






It what appears to be a flow against the tide, Facebook is musing the pros and cons of jumping into the Chinese Internet marketplace.

On the heels of Google’s abrupt withdrawal from China over censorship issues, the popular social hub  appears to be ready to throw caution to the wind.

It may be a good marriage; after all, in recent days members of Facebook have complained about invasion of privacy and rights violations, prevalent in China.

The Chinese media at Sina.com held back on the specifics, but a Facebook representative had no qualms about spouting off at the mouth about the possibilities.

“We’re interested in China, just as we are with many other countries, and while we are studying and learning about them all, we have no specific plans for China at this time.”

Yup!

They’re about to launch a Facebook banner on the Chinese blogosphere.

A tipster at Sina.com was quick on the uptake and offered up advice to Facebook aficionados.

“They should set up shop like MySpace did by sharing data with the U.S. Market but does not completely copy the American way.”

Since Facebook boasts a membership of 400 million world-wide (with 70% non-U.S. based) perhaps a Global perspective (and hands-on approach) is better suited to their ceremonious entry into the Chinese social, political, and business arenas.


 

Friday, March 12, 2010

McDonalds...Vegas outlet angers customers with whopping $9.95 WiFi access fee!







A handful of patrons were a little startled when they picked up their morning breakfast at the counter at McDonalds and proceeded to flip open their laptops to check their e-mail.

Instead of encountering that familiar map of the Unites States - with McDonalds WiFi locations blinking about it onscreen - a rude log-on page popped up demanding money for access!

Over the past few months, depending on the franchise, WiFi was either offered with a direct access capability for free or offered up to customers on a coupon basis (which required a purchase with no minimum required).

Then, in January, McDonalds announced that WiFi would be free Nationwide (no coupon required).

In spite of this turn of events - and a boost in business at the fast-food take-out - the McDonalds outlet on Las Vegas Boulevard (next to Circus Circus and across from the Sahara Hotel) surprised regulars and tourists alike when they programmed their WiFi service this past week to drum up a log-in page (referred to as Guest Access) that required a flat fee of $9.95 a day to browse on the Internet.

In this scenario - tourists, business men on-the-go, and locals - would end up paying an astronomical sum for WiFi access each month whenever they chose to use the service sporadically.

When you consider that AT&T has a monthly fee of  $19.95 for unlimited access, the McDonalds fee structure is outrageous.

Talk about greed!

I predict there will be a big drop-off in business - at that location for sure - because consumers are mad as hell (and they're not going to take it anymore).


 

Friday, February 19, 2010

Twitter...incompetent tech staff unable to fix log-in problem!




Bullsh**
(Twitter tech staff make it difficult)



They must be asleep at the wheel at Twitter - or just maybe - their technical support team have no skills when it comes to correcting log-in problems at the social hub site.

A few days ago, I published a post noting that I was unable to log in to Twitter, and that I was forced to zip off an e-mail to the technical support team for assistance.

Post:  02/15/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/02/twitterno-tweets-for-me-site-glitch.html

As I noted in the original post, I received an automated response first, in which Twitter staff informed me that that they assigned a ticket No. to the issue  and that they'd get back to me after they investigated further.

Sure enough, two hours later, I received an e-mail in which Twitter fessed up that there was definitely a technical problem and that they would get right on it.

Today, I was quite perplexed when I received an e-mail from Twitter, informing me that the ticket was closed.

One problemo!

After five days, and no apparent action on Twitter's part, I still can't log in!

How difficult is it to fix a log-on glitch?

The Twitter CEO - who boasts about the excellence of his staff and the Twitter social hub - obviously needs to get off the publicity trail (and a**) and take a second look in his own back yard.

Incompetent staff - and computer glitches - are hurting the credibility and reliability of the service!

Is it a wonder that people often refer to twitter as a rinky-dink outfit with limited capacity to compete with the big guns like google, facebook, yahoo, and the like?

Frankly, I'm disgusted.

No very tweet at all, folks!



Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Google...Chinese cyber attacks! Virus & trojan alerts posted weeks ago...



Google cyber-attacks in China!



A few weeks ago when I was conducting a search at GOOGLE,one of  my anti-virus program issued an alert about malicious viruses and trojans at the GOOGLE site.

I proceeded to pen a post to alert internet surfers.

Post: 12/12/09

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2009/12/blogspotsecurity-alert-intruder-posts.html

Over the next few days, GOOGLE and media outlets failed to report the  incidents, which I thought was a bit odd.

Meanwhile, on FACEBOOK - after the alert was posted on my home page - a hacker slipped into my site and began to post messages with my photograph and name without my knowledge or permission (in retaliation or was the intrusion just a coincidence?)

The unknown individuals used the FISH TANK game to gain access, so I immediately stopped participating in those kind of software programs being offered by FACEBOOK (or other members).

After I reported the incident to FACEBOOK the hacking at that portal stopped.

So, I expect that technical staff at the popular social hub took action.

Just this past week, though, GOOGLE admitted to having been under attack a few weeks ago during the time frame I mentioned the attacks originally occurred.

So, it appears in retrospect, that my report was correct.

For some inexplicable reason, GOOGLE and the team at their headquarters, kept silent for a couple of weeks.

On Friday, it was reported that GOOGLE and about twenty other companies, were sent e-mails or instant messages addressed to their senior technical managers in a sly effort by hackers to entice them into clicking on a web page links.

When a major anti-virus company got caught up in the ruse, they discovered a flaw in Internet Explorer's Web browser (the one I used to search at GOOGLE when I stumbled on the virus and trojan activity).

Attackers capitalized on the glitch to take control of PC's and began probng the network for intellectual property of high value that they could hijack surreptiously.

Microsoft is now working on a patch to alleviate the problem.

Meanwhile, internet users are being advised to not only use a firewall, but set the level on high.

Officials have underscored that the perpetrators were not naive young hackers tampering on the internet to bolster their egos.

In fact, they believe that sophisticated individuals which high-tech capabilities (who plotted their steps quite carefully) were involved.

It is speculated that their home base of operations was in China.

Google has considered pulling out of China, in fact, because of the security breaches.


It is alleged that China and other overseas nations in that region (and elsewhere) have been involved first-hand in state-sponsored cyber intrusions of commerical and military targets.

James Lewis, a Program Director at the Center for Strateic and International studies,  noted to the press recently that China has been actively pursuing a tech industry.

He has levelled an accusing finger at Chinese officials and alleged that they have sought to accomplish that end by engaging in illicit technological transfer of intellectual property (theft) without permission (and sometiimes even knowledge of the victims).

News at 11!





Tuesday, December 22, 2009

President Obama...appoints Howard Schmidt to head up CyberSecurity @ White House!







Today, I received an e-mail from one of my contacts at the White House, informing me that the President has chosen Howard Schmidt to be the White House Cybersecurity Coordinator.

John O. Brennan - Assistant to the President for Homeland Security & Counterterrorism - prefaced the announcement by noting that protecting the internet is critical to National Security, public safety, and the personal privacy of U.S. Citizens and their civil liberties.

 "It’s also vital to President Obama’s efforts to strengthen our country, from the modernization of our health care system to the high-tech job creation central to our economic recovery," he added matter-of-fact.

Howard Schmidt will have the responsibility of orchestrating the many important cybersecurity activities across the government.

According to White House officials, the appointee is one of the world’s leading authorities on computer security with some forty years of experience in government, business and law enforcement.

Howard will have regular access to the President and serve as a key member of his National Security Staff.

He will also work closely with Obama's economic team to ensure that cybersecurity efforts in the Nation are secure and prosperous.

In closing, Brennan noted that Officials in Washington will use the WhiteHouse.gov e-mail program  (and  other communication tools) to keep concerned citizens such as myself (and others) posted about the progress being made in this area which is of utmost importance to President Obama.

I look forward to those updates, Mr. President!






Friday, May 29, 2009

Christina DeRosa...touts "Share This". A practical online service...



Christina DeRosa is a pretty petite beauty who has been garnering a lot of attention over the past year - in part due to her high-profile role on the popular series - "Sex Chronicles".

No wonder, Christina sinks her teeth into everything she pursues wholeheartedly.

Quite the fashion plate, Christina also turns heads wherever she goes!

A few weeks ago, DeRosa lent her considerable skills in the style arena to raise funds for a worthy cause, the "All Stars Fashion Show" (Hollywood).

Needless to say, the high-energy fashion extravaganza - which attracted dozens of dazzling personalities who chomped at the bit to take a stroll down the red carpet lined with frenzied paparazzi - was a surefire success.

But DeRosa is not just a perky actress with an eye on the limelight.

On the heels of that sold-out event, the talented DeRosa threw herself into a rally (and madcap treasure hunt headed up by name stars in the industry) to raise much-needed funds for the Los Angeles Children's Hospital, which also ended on a top note ($$$$$).

Yesterday, I was not surprised to receive an e-mail from Christina inviting me to sign up for "Share This" - a web site venture that provides a simplistic way to "share" information (blog posts, news features, and celebrity profiles) as quick as-a-wink on the Internet.

Although I have not quite figured out the semantics of "share this", upon receipt of the invite, I was inclined to recall that just a few months ago friends urged me to jump on the Twitter bandwagon.

But, when I urged others to sign up, what was their initial response?

Twitter!

Say what?

If Christina is involved with "share this", or recommending the site, there must be some substance to it.

Bottom line, the whole concept of "sharing" appeals to me, anyway.

How 'bout you?

Ralph Waldo Emerson once opined:

"Our best thoughts come from others."


Thursday, February 19, 2009

Facebook...terms of use changed in wake of protests!



When FACEBOOK announced in a press release the other day that terms of use at the interactive social hub were being changed - and that content on the web site would be viewed as the property of the site providers - a thought crossed my mind.



"Oh, oh! Folks ain't gonna like that."



Curiously, over the past few days, I haven't heard a peep out of a multitude of Facebook-savvy "friends".



Have they been holding back on their "secret passionate thoughts" for fear FACEBOOK staff will squirrel 'em away for future posterity?



On the heels of that startling news - and the uproar that erupted thereafter on the blogosphere and throughout civilized parts of the known world - FACEBOOK did an about - um - face!



Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg assured concerned FACEBOOK members that the company was revising its policies this week in respect to the "Governing Document" which dictates the terms of use.



Feedback from the 170 million or so users at the trendy Internet watering hole is welcome, the pimply-faced CEO was quick to note for the record.



Some breathed a sigh of relief.



A content of a post on Zuckerberg's blog - during the throes of the controversy in recent days - disturbed die-hard fans, after all.



The chief's pollyanna attitude - "just trust us" - didn't fly with many!



But, there was a silver lining to the whole fiasco.



In the aftermath of the avalanche of protests, FACEBOOK has taken up the arduous task of zealously crafting a spirited "Bill of Rights" to facilitate the sharing of information in the future.



"We need a license in order to help share information with your friends, but we don't claim to own your information."



The way the unexpected "take over" of data came down - and was summarily abandoned by virtue of a hasty retreat - remains highly suspect to a posse of industry-insiders.



Harvard Professor Harry Lewis - who teaches in the field of Computer Science - was in accord with analysts who opined on the issue.



"People will have legitimate suspicions until they see the result."



Something tells me - no matter how the issue is ultimately resolved by FACEBOOK - that Big Brother is still watching.



Welcome to an Internet version of George Orwell's 1984.










http://www.julianayrs.com



Sunday, December 21, 2008

Web TV...Welcome to Lost Angeles. Signed SAG agreements with actors...


One of the big bones of contention in the stalled contract talks with the Screen Actors Guild and Hollywood producers pertains to profit-sharing over web content and the rich media proliferating in its wake.

In spite of reports flying out of newsrooms around the country that producers are adamant about not yielding on this contract issue, a couple of creators of a Web TV show ignored the call-to-arms and proceeded to sign their actors under a SAG "experimental" contract.

Part of the reason they firmed up the talent this way was due to the uncertainty of the potential to realize a profit online.

"We signed agreements with our actors that stipulate a share in the profits when the series goes into the black."

I laughingly noted to one of the writers when we crossed paths at the upbeat Chalk Rep Theatre launch the other night - that in the old days - "deferred pay" meant "no pay".


Although he and his partner chuckled at the joke, both were dead serious about following through on their commitment to the actors.

The made-for-the-web TV Show has a few episodes in the can in spite of tough financial times the industry has been facing in recent days.

The project - "Welcome to Lost Angeles" - focuses on a young man who moves out to California to pursue his dreams which run afoul when interrupted by unemployment, a troubled relationship, and few unexpected mishaps around the lower mainland along the way.

Of course, the fictionalized storyline appears to be a take-off on the old idea that the West Coast metropolis - once known as the City of Angels - has been relegated to the status of "City of Lost Angels".

Yeah, it's tough-going getting a break in the sprawling third-world city - which I have cynically christened - the "big bad orange".

While the concept of the weekly series seems a bit cliche, I'm holding judgment; especially since the creators are still "tooling" around with ideas for the next season.

Check it out.

Info: http://www.lostangeles.tv/