.:[Double Click To][Close]:.
Showing posts with label Rip Off. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rip Off. Show all posts

Monday, April 19, 2010

Pavillions...fraud! Deceptive business practices! Theft at cashier's desk...








When you head to the check out at Pavillions, it may be a good idea to keep track of the charges being inputted into the cash register.

This is especially true if you plucked up some produce or cleaning solvents because you were under the impression the goods were on sale as advertised at the stall, by eye-catching flyer, or in a splashy TV blurb.

The truth of the matter is that quite a few of the Pavillions sales are a scam designed to lure shoppers into the store! 

It is doubtful Pavillions intended to follow through in good faith.

For example, over the past couple of days when I procceded to cash out, my eagle eye caught the clerks ignoring sale items and charging full price.

Just yesterday, in fact, I encountered a frustrating experience which signalled how dishonest (and deceptive) Pavillions management is.

I spied bottled water on sale for 99 cents.  In fact, how could I miss this reduced item, since the tag was about six inches by six inches in size and placed directly where the product sat in neat rows in the cooler.

But, when I attempted to ring the item in at the automated cashier, the price rang up at $1.76.

I called over the box boy standing a stone's throw away and pointed out the error.

Oh, we was quick on the uptake, alright.

"The sale is for bottled water in plastic containers," he snidely remarked.

So, I trotted back to the refrigerator, re-checked the price, and snatched up the spring water in a plastic bottle.

Once again, the item rang up @ $1.76.

Liar!

On the second occasion, he simpleton couldn't even be bothered (too lazy or too embarassed?) to haul his sorry a** back to the display to verify the price.

The skinny as-a-rail loser called over to another employee to check the price (again!).

The word back?

Now the price was two bottles for $3.00

Huh?

At this juncture, I basically hinted at where he could put his bottle of water with the floating price tag.

Needless to say, I have posted this Consumer Alert, to warn customers who shop at Pavillions to keep their eye on those thieves at the check-out stand.

They'll rob 'ya blind!




Wednesday, March 31, 2010

San Francisco...Asian clerk @ David's food store rips off tourists! Idiot can't speak English, either...





Rip-off grocer!



Sometimes the stupidity (and gall) of people is quite shocking!

For example, on occasion during the course of my fun vacation in San Francisco, I have patronized a couple of the local grocery stores in the vicinity of my Hotel in the business district.

Now and then, my sweet tooth rears its ugly head, and I dash out to satiate it.

On those occasions during the late-night munchie hours, I have been inclined to pop into a variety store just around the corner (612 Kearny) to pluck up a small bag of lemon drops, jelly beans, what-have-you.

Like other stores around the city - and in Los Angeles, too - the store sells a brand of candy that is priced @ the princely sum (!) of  2 packages for $1.00 (which is printed on the top in plain view).

Without fail, over the past week or so, the cashier(s) on duty have charged me fifty cents in the event I trot up to the counter with one package in hand.

 After all, one dollar divided by two is fifty cents.

If my childhood lessons in arithmetic serve me well!

I admit, some stores will charge fifty-nine cents, in the event one package is selected instead of two.

I have no qualms with that scenario in the least (a surcharge for opting out?).

However, today when I approached the counter to pay, the clerk refused to take fifty cents (in spite of the fact his co-workers have done just that over the course of the past  week).

Instead, he stabbed he package with a stubby finger where the price of $1.00 was printed, and gestured that he required that sum as payment (in spite of the fact I only wanted to purchase one bag of candy).

Is this man a moron, or what?

Then, the second problem arose!

When I attempted to explain that shopkeepers at stores around California usually charged fifty cents for one bag (or fifty-nine cents depending on how cheap or desperate the store owner tended to be) I was unable to communicate with the man because he didn't speak any English!

Notwithstanding, I was also unable to ask why the other clerks charged me fifty cents all week, under the same set of circumstances.

Imagine that!

In my humble opinion, a person would have to be an idiot to hire an individual who doesn't speak English to man the cash register in a part of the city overrun with tourists!

I am mad as hell and I am not going to take it anymore.

If these losers (in this case a middle-aged Asian man with no arithmetic skills) can't learn English and assimilate into North American Society, I say ship him back to China, Japan, from whence he (and others like him)  came.

God speed!

After all, the man in questions is useless to our community, and just taking up much-needed space.

Amen!



More tricks than treats
@ David's Food store!


Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Earthlink...embezzles funds! Engages in fraud, breach of contract & false advertising!



Imagine this scenario!

After tracking down a web hosting plan that suits your budget - for approximately $20.00 a month, let's say - you proceed to explore the control panel at the new server to ready yourself for the painstaking task of designing, building, and publishing your web site.

When you stumble on the option to set alerts on the account, you input a request that a notice be sent out in the event you go over your monthly usage, to ultimately ensure that your remain within your budget for the project online.

At the suggestion of the web hosting company - in this instance, Earthlink - you agree to input your debit card information in their data base so that the monthly fee of may be deducted from your acccount without the necessity of writing and mailing in a check each month.

Afer a few months, the site is pretty well-developed, attracting traffic, and everything looks hunky-dorey.

Each month you've been billed the sum due without incident.

Then, out-of-the-blue one day, Earthlink informs you by snail mail that a charge in the sum of approximately $968.00 (and some change) has been returned from the bank unpaid.

Say what?

Obviously Earthlink has not only made a serious error, but acted illegally, for having tried to debit a charge in an excessive sum (1) without notice; (2) for a sum that was not due; (3) in violation of the terms of agreement (no notice was given that any surcharges were tacked on due to overlimit usage either).

Was it all a silly mistake, a typo perhaps?

In response, the account-holder mails out a letter objecting to the charge, on the grounds that no alert was sent.

In particular, the customer expresses their outrage about the illegal attempt to debit an excessive sum of approximately $969.00 from their bank account without legal notice or authority to charge the sum in question.

Earthlink fails to respond, so the customer assumes that  the error was corrected.

Not so fast!

Two weeks later, in spite of the fact Earthlink has not addressed the original complaint, the larcenous  web hosting company fires off a second billing notice alleging that the sum of approximately $1600.00 is now due.
Huh?

How is it possible for a monthly bill of $19.99 to jump to $969.00  in two short weeks, then to the outrageous astronomical sum of $1600.00 ten days later?

And, don't forget that alert!

There was no record of any alerts being e-mailed out as requested, or any proof of any Earthlink response to the allegations of breach of agreement, attempted embezzlement of funds, false advertising, and deceitful business practices.

Notwithstanding the failure to respond, address the issues - and so forth and so on - Earthlink once again attempted to debit without notice or legal authority to do so for the staggering sum of $2200.00.

Fortunately, the customer kept low-ball sums in the checking account, to prevent embezzlement of funds.

In addition to the headaches surrounding the dishonest illegal conduct of Earthlink, there is a second issue the web client must now contend with.

After months of developing the sight with thousands of man hours devoted to the cause, the individual must now relocate the site at considerabe effort (and additional costs), to another web hoster to escape the deceitful and dishonest clutches of the earthlink bank thieves.

In addition to the foregoing, it should be noted for the record, that the service provided was not even that professional or reliable.

Several times a week, the customer was forced to spend a hour or so with customer support online, to sort out problems that continued ad nauseam.

For example, oftentimes the customer and visitors to the site, were not able to access the web homepage, which according to an error message (a denial of access code) stated the site was not available due to a password requirement (???), site publishing errors, whatever.

Also, on dozens of ocasions, images failed to load properly on the web pages, which resulted in ugly gaping holes on the posts (which looked shoddy, unprofessional, and downright amateurish).

After six weeks, Earthlink continued to add surcharges, but as of this date has never met their burden to establish by virtue of accounting and proper documentation how the figures were tabulated.

In the end scenario, the customer was forced to close his bank account (after all, when he attempted to delete the credit card info from the web site data base, his efforts were blocked by dishonest Earthlink employees who obviously intended to keep trying debits with that card automatically until they hit pay dirt by a fluke).

And, get this, when the customer tried to transfer their domain name (which they owned) to another web host plan - Earthlink also blocked the ID code from releasing the site - even though they did not have the authority or legal right to do so.

Talk about scumbags!

Avoid these a**holes and their web hosting plans like the plague!!



CEO rip-off thief at Earthlink!


Sunday, December 27, 2009

Best Buy...deceptive business practises! Defective products! Incompetent Geek Squad!



Lady Gaga used as lure by unscrupulous retailers!




Many of you probably recall the long lines at Best Buy on boxing day as penny-wise bargain hunters braved the elements to be the first to snap up discounted electronic products - laptop computers - in particular.

Unfortunately, a handful of consumers are grumbling now in the aftermath, for good reason.

In restrospect, it appears that Best Buy engaged in deceptive business practices, sold defective products, and hood-winked a trusting public in general.

For example, when customers snatched up discounted computers at three or four hundred bucks, they weren't aware that what they were buying was a shell of a PC, and that there would be additional greenbacks to fork out in the near future to maintain installed programs.

For starters, Microsoft Word was installed as a trial version, and not a keeper.

On each occasion a user opened up the software a message informed the startled individual that there were only twenty-five sessions available before the hapless victim would be required to buy a license at considerable cost to facilitate use of the program in the future.

In fact, as it turned out, a handful of the installed programs were offered up at purchase with the same provisio - but get this - Best Buy did not disclose that all-important detail at the point of sale.

Shoppers were also shaking their heads at check-out when it came time to purchase their computer.

A clerk at the cash register noted before ringing the item up that the laptops were installed with a security feature.

When the buyer uttered "okay" - after assuming that "security" meant  there was a lock or tracer on the product (it turned out to be a simple anti-virus packet) - they were shocked to learn that the feature not only cost $100.00 - but also required special servicing at the Geek Squad counter!

One consumer was anxious to  zip off to pack for a week-end get-a-way - and so - opted to pass on the software item.

Gotcha!

Opting out of the security feature also required a trek over to the Best Buy nerd experts so that the program could be deleted from the "guts" of the computer.

I don't know about you, but when I purchase a computer, I expect to be the first (and only) individual to ceremoniously log on to what amounts to a very pricey personal belonging.

But, the mind-boggling "fraud" doesn't end there!

When one intelligent computer-savvy buyer chose to acceept the sealed package - as is - and pay cash, his nose went a little out-of-whack when the annoying salesman tried to get him to fork over  his credit card for a scan.

"I'm paying cash," the startled gentleman hissed at him.

The response was unbelievable.

"We need to swipe the card so that when the anti-virus license is up for renewal a year from now (!) we can charge your account automatically."

Did they ask the consumer if he wanted to renew?

No, of course not!

The angry customer was so annoyed, he told the salesman to cancel the anti-virus protection.

Not one to lose a sale, the clerk was quick on the uptake.

"Okay, I'll delete the anti-virus program on the laptop, and install one that doesn't require a license renewal at the end of the year," he stated with smug satisfaction.

Even still, the disgruntled shopper was forced to wait a half-an-hour until that task was completed.

Customers need to be forewarned, too, to double-check the packing box and contents before leaving the retail outlet.

When Best Buy "nerds" effect the installation changes, they snatch up the original recovery CD's shipped from the manufacturer with the new laptop,  and substitute them for copies they've handwritten labels on.

Tacky!
Meanwhile, when the excited laptop owner aforementioned got home, he could have kicked himself for even stepping inside the door of Best Buy, in view of what transpired later.

Shortly,  after he logged on to the Internet, the laptop went to blue screen and crashed.

Uh-huh!

The geek squad at Best Buy damaged the computer before it even left the store!

The moral of the story?

Shop somewhere else, even if Lady Gaga appears in the store for photo ops, in the future.

In the final analysis, Best Buy has been deceitfully trading on the pop star's name and reputation, to lure potential victims in the door.






Sunday, November 29, 2009

Nordstrom's...rips-off shoppers! Dishonest retailer charges double for tagged merchandise...



Imagine that!

Today, after a couple of exhausting hours shopping at the mall, I stepped up to the cash register at Nordstrom's in West Los Angeles to purchase a pair of running shoes for the sum of $49.95 & basic no-frills jeans for the princely sum of $78.00 (yes, at this snotty outlet, the merchandise is generally overpriced and a consumer rip-off).

I was quite flabbergasted, to say the least, when the cashier - a snippy young man thin as a rail - rang up the two items and arrived at the staggering total of approximately $198.00.

Even when I considered applicable local and state taxes, it was quite evident to me from the get-go, that the sum was incorrect.

When I queried the young dude (with all the charm and personality of a worm) about the cost of each item,  at first - he insisted  in a rude insulting tone of voice - that the shoes were priced @ $98.00. 

At this juncture, I pointed out the correct price, which was $49.99 (marked inside the shoe).

He balked, and asserted that I was wrong, and that the price was the higher one quoted.

At this point, a nnumber of shoppers overheard the commotion, and started to gawk from their perches in the vicinity of the register.

Flustered by the predicament he was in, the kid with the mismatched shoes (a man should never wear brown boots with a dark blue suit!) proceeded to thrust the blame on me in a deceitful effort to avoid recrimination).

Was Nordstrom's really trying to charge me double the cost of the shoes?  

Yes, but I caught their dishonest employee red-handed in front of a whole posse of shoppers, who continued to stare in  total disbelief as the Nordstrom thief stood there twisting in the wind red-faced.

After a few awkward moments, he then took a stab at passing the blame on to a fellow employee.

"Someone put the shoes in the wrong box," he blurted out.

As Judge Judge would say:

"Do I have stupid written on my forehead?"

Notwithstanding the obvious, he did not even bother to apologize!

No, sir!

Then, he did something totally retarded.

He proceeded to incorrectly input my personal  data into the computer in, so that second time around (when the charges were being calculated and submitted for approval),  the information got garbled and was summarily rejected.

No wonder!

Put garbage in, you get garbage out.

Was this sorry excuse for a human being born under a rock, or what?

Where do shop owners like Nordstrom's find these losers?

In so many words, I told him to forget the purchase, but you know what I was really thinking!

"You  can take the shoes and jeans and shove them up your  butt!"

He was such a  big asshole, that there wouldn't be any need for any lubricant, either!

Bottom line?

I recommend that you avoid Nordstrom's in the future.

All the prissy little fags who work there are not only incompetent, but need a serious attitude adjustment, and are not worth the bother (or your hard-earned cash).

Amen!





Monday, August 31, 2009

CVS...retailer dishonest about sale offers! Staff rude & insulting...

Get ripped off 27/7 at CVS!




One day I trekked down to my regular pharmacy and got a rude awakening.

Much to my chagrin, the corporate giant that runs CVS gobbled up the retail outlet I was loyal to, without so much as a:

"Wham-bam!  Thank you man!"

Like Wal-Mart before it, a CVS invasion into the mainstream marketplace has been making waves across the country .

For the most part, the reaction of consumers has been negative.

Outside one outlet  in Westwood, for example, a posse of activists scrambled to coral  customers as they exited the thriving enterprise with the specific aim of rustling up signatures for a petition seeking to trigger action against CVS (and their evil empire) for allegedly selling confidential medical information gleened from pharmacy records in violation of consumer rights.

Although a lawsuit was also filed against CVS in recent months for allegedly selling expired products on the shelves which posed a potential threat to customers' overall health and well-being (which was quickly settled out-of-court in spite of the fact CVS execs insistered there was no wrong-doing on their part) CVS management has continued to engage in dishonest conduct which may be ripe for litigation, too.

Shopppers have complained to consumer advocates - that after they plucked up sale items from the well-stocked shelves to take advantage of the savings - the original price was charged at the cash register instead of the discounted one advertised.

This past weekend, for instance, I spied two sales I was inclined to act upon.

One, offered regular-size chocolate bars (normally 89 cents each) at the yummy price of two for-a-buck.

Also, ten bottles of vitamin water (which normally retail at $1.69 each) were being offered for a sawbuck.

If  that paper-money jargon has you baffled, just quiz an old-timer at the market for the answer.

Uh-huh!

Ten bucks.

With bargains in hand, I stepped up to the rough 'n tumble line (CVS has the WORST check out system in retail chain hell. The bozo who designed the sucker must have had sh** for brains) snaking down an aisle to await my turn.

The first two items (candy bar snacks) didn't pass muster!

"This one is $1.59," the clerk smirked at me.

I motioned to the counter below where the price (the one I correctly quoted) screamed out in bold black type from a brilliant yellow tag.

"Well, it's a mistake," he responded rudely.

At this juncture, I heard a couple of snickers (no pun intended) from a couple of customers behind me,  who were starting to shift from one leg to another impatiently.

I thought I'd give him the benefit of the doubt, set them aside, and motioned for him to ring up the remaining item.

When he announced the total, I stared back in disbelief.

Something was amiss.

After scannning the receipt, I spied the error right off-the-bat. 

Instead of charging me $1.00 for the Vitmain water, he inputted the sum of $1.99.

When I pointed out the overcharge, he got annoyed with me.

Apparently, a celebrated athlete was tied into a special promotion for the same thirst-quencher.

But, if I recalled correctly, that special was not advertised in the glass refrigerator at the back of the store.

So, I trotted down the aisle and verified that the sale price I was referring to was correct - at which point - I called out for him to check the sale price for himself.

In response, one of his co-workers strode up and took a glance at the offending tag, then retorted:

"We have two sales. You were charged for the other one."

"Well, I want the one that was advertised here," I firmly underscored without batting-an-eye.

Frustrated by the confrontation - and obviously not intelligent or experienced enough to fathom how to resolve the dilemma - he suddenly contradicted himself.

"That sale ended today,"  he replied smugly.

 "So there! Gotcha," he appeared to be saying.

"Sir," (I used the term loosely - after all - he was a seriously overweight twenty-something kid with a spiteful unprofessional attitude) "the law requires that you sell me the item for the avertised price".

Oh, did that get his goat!

To shake things up a bit, I thought I'd throw a little scare in his direction.

"CVS just settled a lawsuit for violating consumer laws. Do you want to be sued again?"

His jaw dropped.

Meanwhile, the line at the counter was bloating-up by the minute.

Boy, were the natives getting  pi**ed.

Suddenly, the little dough-boy yelled out to the cashier in an exasperated tone.

"Give it to him for a buck."

The cashier rang up the charges, I paid, and that was that.

When I headed out the door, I was absolutely floored when I overheard a nasty remark the disgruntled CVS worker uttered up to his co-worke behind my back.

"Because of that a**hole, I have to change all the price tags!"

Well, that was it in a nutshell, wasn't it?

Or, was it?

Why didn't CVS Management instruct staff to strike sale tags as soon as the goods were no longer available at bargain prices?

CVS's failure to inform employees about consumer laws was highly suspicious, too.

After all, pricing errors on advertised sales should be honored without question.

In the case of CVS, it appears that the company is relying on employee igornance (and their failure to disclose) to get them out of a "fix" when they are caught red-handed fudging on sales items to rack up profit.

I was also miffed at the failure of CVS staff to recognize the repercussions of their reprehensible unprofessional conduct, which interrupted the natural flow of things.

For example,when a customer snaps up a sale item and there is an obvious error in price, the clerk is forced to void the charge, then re-calculate the totals, and-so-forth and-so-on (with obvious delays).

In that event - in addition to the purchaser - the customers in line behind are also forced to deal with the frustrations involved, as well.

On the morning in question - boy! - did I face their ire.

The snafu wasn't my fault, but judging from the nasty glances in my direction, you'd think so.

Heck, I just wanted CVS to honor the sale price without having to twist an arm or two.

Fat chance!

Suddenly, something dawned on me today, as I was penning this post.

What does CVS stand for?

It's a secret code, a get-out-of-jail free card, used frequently at the Evil Empire.

Can't Vouch (for) Sale.