.:[Double Click To][Close]:.
Showing posts with label Corruption. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Corruption. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Las Vegas...violates vendors rights to free enterprise! Clark County Commissioner Steve Sisolak accepts payola?








In recent days, there has been a big brouhaha over the increase of independent street vendors on the Las Vegas strip selling varieties of bottled water, flogging cheap sunglasses, donning costumes for tips, and what-have-you.

A local news station (Fox 5 News) just reported bright-and-early this morning that City Officials - such as publicity-hungry Clark County Commissioner Steve Sisolak - are trying to curb these practices to allegedly clean up the strip.

Sisolak argued that because bottled-water was not sold by licensed vendors, the issue of safety was of prime concern.

Where is the product being bottled?

Is it safe?

In response, one of the independent businessmen noted in a television interview that he tried to apply for a business license, but he was informed by Officials at the license bureau, that it would be next to impossible to obtain a nod of approval from the Las Vegas licensing bureau.

Why?

Greedy Casino owners (and bosses) are running interference and trying to shut-out local businessmen trying to compete in the marketplace on the Las Vegas strip.

Which brings us to the ripe issue of Clark County Commissioner Steve Sisolak.

He is working on behalf of the Casino owners to achieve their end and it raises a red flag in my estimation.

The Commissioner should be acting on behalf of all constituents and not just a select powerful few.

Frankly, I think that Mr. Sisolak should be investigated to determine if he is taking any payola from the Corporate heads of these giant business entities who own the Hotels on the strip to lobby on their behalf.

News at 11!

http://www.thetattler.biz


Wednesday, May 4, 2011

President Barack Obama...refusal to release Osama bin Laden photos triggers cries of "Hoax" & "Conspiracy theories!

President Barack Obama thumbs nose at American public!





A few moments ago - when news swept across the air wires at media outlets around the globe that President Barack Obama has refused to release photos of felled terrorist Osama bin Laden - Americans reacted in shock and anger.

On one of my posts - which reported the highly irregular suspicious circumstances surrounding the alleged "burial" of the former Al Qaeda leader at "sea"  - citizens have been crying foul!

For example, one irate indiviudal posted the following comment:

"No photos! No photos! No photos to be released! What further argument do you need here - this is a massive, massive hoax!!!
Osama bin Laden died in 2001 in Tora Bora, there is no evidence of his death on 01 May 2011!

Post: 05/02/2011

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2011/05/osama-bin-ladenburied-at-sea-death-hoax.html

The President has taken the position that gruesome photos of the corpse may prove to be too inflammatory - so, for that reason - he has chosen to has dig in his heels and refuse to comply with the demands of the American people to deliver up the photos to put the controversy to rest.

In view of the fact there have been so many discrepancies in respect to what actually went-down at the compound - and what was originally reported by the White House -  it is obvious to me that the release of any additional documented evidence may prove to be problematic for the President.

Personally, I believe that if the truth be told, once again it will be determined that the White House engaged in a deceitful cover-up to protect the current administration, the President's image, and the powers-that-be in the military.

President Obama should reflect a moment on the downfall of former President Richard Nixon.

It was not the original acts of misconduct that proved damaging - but rather - the cover-up in the aftermath that was truly criminal which warranted impeachment.

Is Barack Obama venturing down the same slippery road to scandal - and ultimately - oblivion on the political landscape in the future?

News at 11!

http://www.thetattler.biz


Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Las Vegas Justice Court...Violates Defendant rights! In conspiracy with Nevada Highway Patrol & NCO Financial Services!









The Las Vegas Justice Hall is in cahoots with the Nevada Highway Patrol, the Las Vegas Police Department, and NCO Financial Services.

The end result?

Defendant's rights are being violated daily at the Las Vegas Justice Hall - in downtown Las Vegas (Nevada) - for starters!

Notwithstanding, the Las Vegas Justice Hall has has also engaged in a outright conspiracy - with the Nevada Highway Patrol, the Las Vegas Police Department, and NCO Financial Services - in a deceitful illegal ploy to coerce unsuspecting (innocent) defendants into paying hefty fines (oftentimes not due) under the threat of prosectution.

To carry out the sinister shake-down - corrupt Judges and kow-towing employees in adminstration at the Las Vegas Justice Hall - have willfully and wrongfully denied defendants "Notice of Hearing" and the legal right to appear and argue a defense.

In sum, defendants have been denied their constitutional right to due process at the hands of rogue Law Enforcement Officers, immoral corrupt Judges, and dishonest administrative employees on the take at the Las Vegas Justice Hall.

Tattler readers may recall that I previously posted an expose on the Nevada Highway Patrol, in which I tossed a searing spotlight on the misconduct of State Troopers like Officer Del Padre (who routinely engages in illegal stops and harasses innocent motorists without provocation) and two of his superiors - Sergeant Charlex Haycox and Captain Tony Almaraz - who participated in a conspiracy to cover-up abuses under the color of authority and advance a bold-faced deceitful effort to mitigate Nevada Highway Patrol's liablity for damages.

Post:  07/05/2010

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/07/nevada-highway-patrolofficer-del-padre.html

Currently, there is a Tort Claim against Del Padre and the Nevada Highway Patrol, which seeks recovery of damages to compensate the injured parties for damages sustained during the course of the nefarious conduct and arising from the conspiracy to cover up the facts thereafter.

In the aftermath, I determined from evidence on file at the courthouse, that the Las Vegas Justice Court - not only hired disreputable collection agents to harass and threaten defendants - but also - enaged in a conspiracy to coerce defendants into coughing up exhorbitant fees and penalties without benefit of legal recourse which was their inalienable right under the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and pursuant to applicable State and Federal Statues.

In addition - Judges, employees of the Las Vegas Justice Hall, and their agents - NCO Financial Services - willfully stepped "over-the-line"(and broke the law) when they refused to follow the dictates of the Fair Credit Reporting Act - and in the process - denied consumer rights.

For example, defendants were not given proper notice of pending legal actions, or apprised of their rights.

Consequently, warrants were issued, and alleged fees and penalties due were reported in a cavalier illegal manner to three major credit reporting agencies which hurt their names, reputations, and credit worthiness in the community-at-large.

On the heels of these despicable illegal acts, the agents of the Las Vegas Justice Hall, proceeded to threaten and harass the defendants and peristed with illegal conduct in violation of their rights.

For the record, it should be noted that NCO Financial Services is a disreputable debt collection agency, that has not only been investigated in the past by the Government authorities for wrongdoing - but on the heels of the probe - ended up being slapped with staggering fines (levied by the Federal Trade Commission) to the whopping tune of $1.5 million.

By their mere assocation with NCO Financial Service, it appears that the Las Vegas Justice Hall condones their despicable illegal wrongful acts - and thus - have blood on their hands in the final analysis.

For the foregoing reasons, at least one wronged party has lodged a formal complaint with the FBI with a demand for a full investigation with the ultimate aim of prosecution to deter such reprehensible conduct (and willful violation of consumer rights) in the future.

In response, the Nevada Highway Patrol has chosen to remain silent, in a dishonest self-serving ploy to mitigate their damages.

How long will the cesspool of corruption continue at the Las Vegas Justice Hall?

Stay posted for updates!

http://www.thetattler.biz/





Rogue cops lurk on highways to lure victims!

Thursday, March 3, 2011

San Francisco...dirty cops accused of illegal searches! I witnessed Rights Violations!







Officials are alleging that San Francisco Police Officers engaged in illegal search and seizures - and falsified reports to back up their cavalier law enforcement procedures - which were in direct violation of individuals rights.

In support of their accusations, investigators have offered up videos to back up the damning claims.

For example, footage captured by hallway surveillance cameras show that during the searches, Officers had a master key - and in one case quickly used it to open up the door - so four officers could rush in and grab a suspect who was quickly dragged into the hall and handcuffed.

In their defense, the Officers in question have asserted that they were led to the suspect apartments by virtue of  legitimate tips (by snitches?).

Although they did not secure search warrants, the rogue cops have sworn up-and-down, that they followed constitutional requirements by getting consent before entering said premises in order to search the rooms.

I personally witnessed this kind of  illegal conduct by the San Francisco Police Department in the recent past.

A few months ago, I was staying at a small Hotel in the North Beach area, when I overheard a commotion in the hallway.

I put my ear to the door, and overheard a couple of males (who identified themselves as San Francisco Police Officers) bang on doors with their fists, and demand that tenants open up.

Through an open window, I also overheard a curious conversation between two guests in the quaint little Hotel.

"Did they ask to see your identification," one shaken tourist grumbled to his friend.

If there was no answer at a door, San Francisco's finest moved on down the hall at random, to the next.

I immediately turned down the volume on my TV and sat quietly on my bed for a second or two.

Sure enough, they pounded on my door, too.

So, I made like the room was empty, and ignored their request to open the door.

Wouldn't you?

After all, I was keenly aware that the San Francisco cops were flagrantly violating the letter of the law under color of authority.

At this juncture, a full investigation has been requested by City Officials, fortunately.

"Perjury is a crime...a felony...and so is filing a false police report," public defender Jeff Adachi, noted for the record.

"The integrity of the criminal justice system is in question.  If you can't trust what a police office testifies to, it calls into question what they're doing out there.

Amen!

Adachi said it would be appropriate for an independent agency to get involved because the District Attorney - George Garcon - whose office would decide if criminal charges should be filed against the officers was Police Chief when the searches took place.

"That creates an obvious conflict of interest," Adachi concluded.

Although Gascon has opened up an investigation to determine whether there was any criminal wrongdoing on the part of the officers, he has scoffed at the notion that the matter be handed over to an outside agency.

And so, the corruption continues, in my estimation!

http://www.thetattler.biz





Fairy Tale notions about San Francisco!

Sunday, February 6, 2011

Nevada Highway Patrol...State Attorney General investigates rogue Highway Patrol Officers Captain Karen M. Lorenzo & Patrolman Del Padre!











In response to a complaint from a California motorist, the Nevada State Attorney General - Catherine Cortez Masto - has launched an investigation into the shocking misconduct of Nevada Highway Patrol Officers which resulted in rights violations and personal injury to the individual in question.

On July 4th, a rogue cop - by the name of Officer Del Padre (Badge # 691) -ignored the rule of law and abused his color of authority by virtue of an illegal stop on Highway I-15 in downtown Las Vegas (NV).

I reported on the incident in a post.

On July 4th, a rogue cop - by the name of Officer Del Padre (Badge # 691) -ignored the rule of law and abused his color of authority by virtue of an illegal stop on Highway I-15 in downtown Las Vegas (NV).

I reported on the incident in a post.

Post: 07/04/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/07/nevada-highway-patrolofficer-del-padre.html

In response to my own queries on behalf of the victim, I initially received word back from Captain Karen M. Lorenzo that disciplinary action would be taken.

In her written correspondence, Ms. Lorenzo stated as follows:

"I can assure you that this matter was properly investigated and addressed. Furthermore, I can assure you that any sustained allegations of misconduct will be addressed administratively for appropriate corrective action."

However, when I attempted to determine what actions were taken against the officer, I got the run-around.

For some inexplicable reason, Captain Lorenzo ignored my requests for detailed information, after-the-fact.

What an outrage!

I also reported on the ongoing corruption of Captain Lorenzo and her fellow officers at the Nevada Highway Patrol

Post: 11/17/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/11/nevada-highway-patrolcaptain-karen-m.html

It should also be noted - that the "victim" never received an apology from the Nevada Highway Patrol once Captain Lorenzo - once she completed her "so-called" investigation.

Also - in spite of repeated requests - there has not been any effort by the Nevada Highway Patrol to compensate the individual for the damages they sustained at the hands of the rogue cop.

In my mind's eye, there has been a conspiracy underfoot to protect the Officer in question, at the expense of the "victim".

In fact, once the Nevada Highway Patrol was apprised of the fact that there was a pending lawsuit for damages (a tort claim with the State Attorney General's Office) the Department engaged in a bold-faced deceitful effort to conceal the facts with the ultimate aim of shielding the officer(s) and the Highway Patrol from liability for damages and further public scrutiny.

I trust that the current investigation commenced this past week will unearth the truth - and ultimately - right the wrongs.

Further, I personally pray that the victim receive the apology they deserve, and appropriate compensation for damages.

Stay posted!

http://www.thetattler.biz

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Nevada Highway Patrol...Captain Karen M. Lorenzo cover-up & conspiracy! Rogue cops Violate motorist rights!








A few weeks ago, I reported on the abusive conduct of a Nevada State Trooper by the name of Del Padre (Badge No. 691), who illegally harassed a motorist under the color of authority.

Post:  07/13/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/07/chief-tony-almaraznevada-highway-patrol.html

After filing a complaint on behalf of the victim, I was quite annoyed to receive a response back from Captain Karen M. Lorenzo (at the Nevada Highway Patrol), who clearly chose to sweep the issues under the rug after-the-fact in a deceitful effort to protect her fellow officers from recrimination.

For example, in her terse response by U.S. Mail, Captain Lorenzo asserted as follows:

"An investigation into your complaints regarding Trooper DelPadre and Sergeant Haycox, employees of the Nevada Highway Patrol, has been completed."

"Although personnel rules prohibit me from discussing our findings and/or information about our employees, I can assure you that this matter was properly investigated and addressed. Furthermore, I can assure you that any sustained allegations of misconduct will be addressed administratively for appropriate corrective action."

Bullsh**!

If you read between the lines, it is quite evident that Captain Lorenzo is just as corrupt as the officers in question, if not moreso!

On its face the communication confirms how reluctant Law Enforcement Officers (and the powers-that-be in uniform) are - to not only take disciplinary action - but reveal to the public what penalty rogue cops will suffer for engaging in conduct that is both abusive to motorists but also in direction violation of their overall rights under the U.S. Constitution.

Shame!

Ms. Lorenzo should be strung up by the ti**ies and given a thousand lashes!

It is because of officers like Lorenzo, that a mockery is made of Law Enforcement, in the final analysis.

There will be rebellion in the streets if action is not taken against corrupt cops like these in Nevada!

Amen.

http://www.thetattler.biz/


Rogue Cop Chief Tony Almaraz!

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Governor Jim Gibbons...allows motorists to be victimized! Nevada Highway Patrol scam!





If you recall, last week I reported on a rogue Officer with the Nevada Highway Patrol (Officer Del Padre / Badge # 691) who was victimizing innocent tourists, engaging in outright harassment, Civil Rights Violations, and prone to destroy evidence to prevent recrimination from his superiors later.

Post:  07/04/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/07/nevada-highway-patrolofficer-del-padre.html

I proceeded to lodge a complaint with Chief  Tony Almaraz, who assured me after the 4th of July holiday weekend, that he would assign officers to conduct an investigation.

After three days, with no word back, it was obvious that Chief Tony Almaraz was either a total loser, or trying to protect his officers in a bold-faced cover-up.

In addition, in the next couple of days it became evident by his missteps, that Chief Tony Almaraz was not only unqualified for the job of head honcho at the Nevada Highway Patrol, but an incompetent boob with no leadership skills, as well.

Post: 07/08/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/07/chief-tony-almarazdeceitful-illegal.html

For this reason, I proceeded to draft a stern complaint against Chief Tony Almaraz with the Office of the Governor - Jim Gibbons - in the State Capital.

Several days passed, and I did not even receive the courtesy of a reply.

Aren't tax-payers - and tourists alike - entitled to the courtesy of a reply?

Is Governor Gibbons under the mistaken impression that he is entitled to collect a pay check (when a large percentage of the population is without work) in spite of the fact he loiters on his fat a** and continually does nothing to protect and serve?

Shame!

Today, when I was perusing the internet for background info on the Governor, I stumbled across a web page featuring a publicity still of Governor Gibbons alongside several of the top dawgs at the State's Nevada Highway Patrol.

Gotcha!

Gibbons is in league with corrupt Nevada Highway Patrol offices, and is probably in on the scam, to illegally stop tourists - fleece their wallets for bogus ticket citations - then send them on their merry way after they've paid through through the nose for towing and storage fees.

Governor, you're a piece of shit.

The sooner residents get rid of the likes of you, the better off Nevadians will be.

Here's my finger, sir!

Sit on it and rotate.


Tuesday, July 13, 2010

Chief Tony Almaraz...Nevada Highway Patrol rogue officer call for resignation!



Call for resignation of Chief Tony Almaraz!





Over the 4th of July holiday, I reported a shocking shake-down on Highway I-15 in Las Vegas, instigated by a corrupt Nevada Highway Patrol officer by the name of Del Padre (Badge # 691).

Post: 07/04/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/07/nevada-highway-patrolofficer-del-padre.html

In sum, Officer Del Padre engaged in an illegal stop, harassed and insulted a motorist, and seized a vehicle in Violation of the motorist's rights.

In addition, Del Padre attempted to destroy incriminating evidence - after-the-fact - to avoid recrimination later.

I noted in the post my intention to contact Chief Tony Almaraz of the Highway Patrol with the specific aim of triggering disciplinary action - and ultimately - to hasten along the release of the illegally-seized vehicle.

When I initially e-mailed Chief Tony Almaraz, he responded the day after the holdays (Tuesday July 6th) with a promise that an officer would be in touch shortly to launch an investigation.

I was hopeful that Chief Almaraz - vested with the public trust - would follow through so that the ugly incident would be resolved as quickly as possible.

The motorist in question was experiencing ill health and was left stranded with limited funds in Vegas.

Unfortunately, Chief Tony Almaraz did not follow through on his word.

In spite of the fact I stressed the urgency of the request, Chief Almaraz neglected to get back in touch "shortly" as promised.

Three days later, I was forced to zip off a follow-up e-mail, and enlighten Almaraz about that fact.

To jolt him out of his complacency, I included a link on a damaging article I wrote about  his incompetence, which ended up right next to his career profile on the Internet under a caption for the Nevada Highway Patrol.

Post: 07/08/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/07/chief-tony-almarazdeceitful-illegal.html
Uh-huh! 

That got a rise out of the Chief!

Within two hours, he fired off an e-mail, to assure me  that  prior to my communication that morning,  two officers had been assigned to the case.

"They informed me (Sgt. Haycox &  Sgt. Snow) that they have already contacted you," he asserted in so many words.

Lies!

A review of the e-mail stamps verify that their communications were zipped off  at approximately the same time as his panicky disjointed message to me (more on that issue later).

I wasn't born yesterday, Chief!

Sgt. Haycox's e-mail was basically a hasty note in which he outlined the steps to file a complaint against State Trooper Del Padre, and legal notice that no investigation could commence until the paperwork was lodged with the Nevada Highway Patrol, etc. etc.

I proceeded to download the complaint form, draft the complaint issues for the victim, and prepare it for submission to the Nevada Highway Patrol for investigation.

At this point, I should note that - in spite of the fact I asked for the address and/or contact number for Internal Affairs as well - neither Sgt. Haycox nor Chief Tony Almaraz provided the information.

In fact,  over the past week, I made a request for the Internal Affairs info three tmes, but as of this date (July 13th) the information has not been forthcoming. 

Is it a State secret?

Afraid of something, gentlemen?

Meanwhile, the issue of the release of the vehicle was conveniently side-stepped by Sgt. Haycox and Chief Tony Almaraz.

Surely, the complaint issues against Officer Del Padre, didn't need to be resolved before the SUV could  be released to its registered owner?

Subsequently, I zipped off an e-mail to Sgt Haycox and Chief Tony Almaraz, with a demand that they prepare the proper documenation so that the victim could pick up his vehicle.

At this point, Sgt. Haycox set forth a couple of options in a follow-up e-mail, which he asserted would resolve the issue.

As it turns out, Sgt. Haycox was simply engaging in a lot of smoke-and-mirrors maneuvers.

Was this a mean-spirited attempt to punish the motorist for filing a complaint against a fellow officer?

When the evenets of the past week are reviewed, the answer rings out loud and clear.

Yes!

For example, in his instructions, Sgt Haycox assured the motorist they could drop into the Nevada Highway Patrol's "South Command" office and arrange for a release of the "hold"  with the appropriate doucments.

If the victim was not in possession of that paperwork, Sgt. Haycox noted that - in the alternative - the motorist could go to the DMV and obtain a "Drive Away" permit so the vehicle could be driven on to the victim's home state without further incident.

Because the Nevada Highway Partrol was out-of-the-way, and the motorist was without his vehicle, he elected to go to the DMV (which required one simple trip on a bus without any complications).

At the DMV, the motorist was able to secure the "Drive Away" permit.

On that occasion, there was a Divine Intervention, which I shall discuss later in a follow-up post.

Meanwhile, the motorist returned to their Hotel - hopeful that the following morning - they would be able to secure their vehicle.

Today - the motorist e-mailed an update on the status of the "Drive Away" permit to Officer Haycox, so he would be aware that all the  documents were in order.

In that e-mail, he also noted that he was proceeding down to the tow yard to pick up his vehicle.

Although Officer Haycox had hours to do so, he never responded to that e-mail, so the motorist proceeded to the tow yard confident that all his paperwork was in order.

After sweating in a hundred-degree weather in the mid-day sun for a couple of hours or so, the motorist - who was suffering shortness of breath and not feeling too well - finally arrived at the Highway Patrol's impound unit at South Strip Towing (3255 Pollux Ave / Las Vegas NV 891020).


When the exhausted individual produced the "Drive Away" permit, a snotty little clerk in the employ of South Strip Towing, snarled at the motorist that his permit was not sufficient.

"You need a pass from the Nevada Highway Patrol," she barked at him.

The tourist tried to explain that the "Drive Away" permit was already sanctioned by Officer Haycox.

At this point, another disgruntled motorist, spoke up.

"I got the same run-around from these people and the Nevada Highway Patrol. It sucks. I had to come down here twice, take a day off work. And it has cost me. I am furious."

Then, the irate young lady lamented that in spite of the fact it was public knowledge that this tow truck facility engaged in shocking mean-spirited conduct on a regular basis, the Nevada Highway Patrol has not taken any action to correct the situation or consider turning over the account to kind decent operators who have a little more compassion and understanding and professionalism.

In spite of the obvious misunderstanding, the clerk refused to permit the motorist to borrow their phone,   so he could speak to a Nevada Highway Patrol officer regarding Sgt. Haycox's directive.

"I don't have a vehicle. I am ill. I am just about ready to collapse in this heat. Can't you help me, please," he begged.

No way, Jose!

At this point, the nasty employee basically laughed at the both of them from the comfort of her glassed-in crawl space.

Then, after claiming there was no manager on the premises to speak to, the cold fish went and hid in the back of the small trailer and continued to make fun of the desperate motorists grumbling about the outrage of it all.

One motorist was kind enough to lend the tourist her cell phone so he could call the Nevada Highway Patrol himself.

Once he got a dispatch person on the line, though, the ditzy Nevada Highway Patrol employee showed little remorse about the obvious misunderstanding and escalating crisis.

At the request of the frustrated victim, she did contact Sgt. Haycox, but he refused to speak to  the stressed-out tourist on the telephone.

"You have to come down to South Command for a release, Sir," was the message he uttered up to dispatch to pass along.

Sgt. Haycox demonstrated by his actions that he could care less that the motorist was about to collapse, was suffering from heat exhaustion, and was in desperate need of assistance.

To add to the lunacy (and cruelty) of it all, it should be noted that when the motorist asked for instructions on how to get to South Command to obtain the release document, she proceeded to give  instructions for the highway route.

What a sorry excuse for a human being!

"Miss, I don't have a vehicle. Please don't give me freeway instructions," he pleaded.

Was she really THAT stupid?

Or, was it a deliberate slap in the face to humiliate the victim further?

"Are you going take a cab, then," she continued in the blink-of-an-eye.

"No, I don't have any money for a taxi," he replied in desperation.

Do these dummies think that money grows on trees?

Because of the illegal seizure of the vehicle on July 4th, the motorist was forced to extend Hotel accommodation a few days, and ended up - as a result - depleting funds.

Did she show any compassion at this juncture?

No.

When the motorist expressed his dismay that the Nevada Highway Patrol was supposed to protect and serve - and that inferred that she was failing to meet that mandate - she remained silent!

Did she apologize to the victim at any point?

Hell, no!

It shocks the sensibilities to imagine that a Highway Patrol Officer would act in such a cold heartless fashion and ignore a citizen's emergency needs!

Chief Tony Almaraz proved to be a slippery piece of work, too.

In recent days, for example, he established to me - by virtue of his sloppy unprofessional conduct - that he is uneducated, an ineffective community leader, incompetent, and not qualified to head up the Nevada Highway Patrol.

For starters, he has difficulty expressing himself in plain English!

For instance, it is obvious from the following excerpt from one of his e-mails, that Chief Almaraz lacks the ability to construct a simple grammatically-sound sentence in the language of the land.

Example
(July 8th e-mail excerpt written by Chief Tony Almaraz)

"I was informed by my command staff in Las Vegas that you have been in fact, contacted reference your complaint against Trp. DelPadre"

Huh?
His failure to correct the glaring English glitch hints at an additional lack of skills.

Doesn't the Chief  know how to conduct a grammar check or use the spell check tool?

Then, there is the question of actual performance, and the ablity to take appropriate action to expedite solutions to problems when called for, and so forth and so on.

For instance, it took three days for Chief Tony Almaraz and his bum-boy Sgt. Haycox, to inform the motorist in question that a trip to the DMV - and application for a "Drive Away" permit - would expedite the release of the vehicle.

Because of the Chief's negligence (and incompetence) in that regard, the vehicle sat in storage un-necessarily for three days racking up storage fees!

In view of the aforementioned facts, it is evident that Chief Tony Almaraz has a problem responding to emergency situations, assigning intelligent personnel to resolve important citizen complaints when they arise, or even exercise any leadership ability when the situation cries out for it.

Essentially, Chief Tony Almaraz is unqualified for the role of head honcho at the Nevada Highway Patrol.

As I noted earlier, Chief Tony Almaraz only bothered to step into the fray, when it came to his attention that I  am a journalist with thousands of readers on the internet and in a position to expose his incompetence, negligence,  and corruption to the public at large and various media outlets who follow my "feeds".

That's a shocking commentary on the Nevada Highway Patrol and Chief Almaraz, if you ask me.

For the foregoing reasons, I urge the resignation of Chief Tony Almaraz, with the ultimate aim of purging the Law Enforcement Agency of a corrupt element that flies in the face of Justice and morality.

Amen!



Thursday, July 8, 2010

Chief Tony Almaraz...deceitful illegal conduct @ Nevada Highwway Patrol! Stalling & delaying tactics frustrate Citizen rights!





A few days ago, I reported on the misconduct of Officer Del Padre, a trooper in the employ of the Nevada Highway Patrol.

The rogue Officer - Del Padre (Badge # 691) - stopped a motorist without the appropriate authority (legal grounds) to do so , harassed the disabled individual on the side of Highway I-15 (Las Vegas), attempted to destroy evidence that would incriminate himself, then proceeded to illegally seize the motorist's vehicle.

Post: 07/05/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/07/nevada-highway-patrolofficer-del-padre.html

Post: 07/06/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/07/arizona-immigration-lawnevada-highway.html

I immediately lodged a formal complaint with Highway Patrol Chief -Tony Almaraz - by e-mail communicaton that afternoon.

Because of the long week-end, I did not receive any word back right away, presumably because Almaraz's office was closed for the 3 days in question.

However, I was encouraged that there may be a quick resolution to the problems outlined in my complaint, when Mr. Almaraz's office responded to my e-mail complaint Tuesday morning after the holiday with a promise to investigate and get back to me.

Three days later, there was no word "back" from Mr. Almaraz, so I was forced to zip off a second e-mail to ask for an update on the investigation since the motorist I filed the complaint on behalf of was starting to suffer damages from Officer Del Padre's wrongful illegal conduct on the side of the highway a few days earlier.

For example, the disabled motorist was stranded with no transportation and little cash in Las Vegas.

In addition, the stress and strain of the ordeal, was starting to cause undue physical, emotonal, and financial hardship to the motorist.

The situation became urgent, subsequently.

In spite of informing Chief Almarez of these disturbing turn-of-events - so that he could grasp the seriousness of the situation which was escalating by the hour - the Nevada Highway Patrol officer entrusted to look out for Public Safety in his capacity as head of the agency has failed to respond.

In addition, it should be noted, that my request for the name and contact e-mail (or physical address) of Internal Affairs has also been ignored.

Was Chief Almaraz's intitial response just a public relations ploy?

Surely, if the man had an ounce of decency (or compassion), he'd take prompt swift action to rectify the wrongs committed due to the illegal conduct of his Officer (Del Padre / Badge No. 691)?

Or, is his stalling and delaying - a clear-cut signal - that he is bent on engaging in a conspiracy to protect his officer - and ultimately - the name and reputation of his Law Enforcement Agency?

After all, my request was simple and straightforward, and does not require a lot of intelligence to carry out.

For example, in my complaint, I demanded that the Nevada Highway Patrol:

1. Waive the towing & storage fees since the seizure was illegal.
2. Release the vehicle to the motorist.
2. Issue an apology.

How difficult a task is that to fulfill?

It should be noted that at the Nevada Highway Patrol web site, the agency has posted a glowing tribute for Chief Tony Almaraz, with a flattering run-down on his alleged past achievements.

It should be noted that the profile states that in November of 2008, Almaraz was assigned to the Department of Public Safety / Nevada Highway Patrol Headquarters, where he was responsible for personnel, budgets and managed issues with the Legislative Counsel Bureau.

That credit alone tends to infer that he should be capable of resolving this complaint issue in a snap.

On the heels of that assignment, he was installed as Chief of the Nevada Highway Patrol.

Evidently,  Almaraz has the power & authority to resolve the complaint.

So, why has Chief Almaraz been dragging his feet, and neglecting his duty to rectify the wrongs inflicted on an innocent citizen, by a corrupt cop who is an obvious threat to the community-at-large?

Maybe the Department of Justice or the FBI can toss some light on that question!



Monday, May 3, 2010

Roman Polanski's...allegations about Steve Cooley true! DA engages in extortion attempts, Intimidation Tactics, Harassment, & Rights Violations!




Corrupt District Attorney Steve Cooley!



Today, the news wires were all awash with a statement Roman Romanski released in his first public overture, since the beleaugered director was first apprehended several months ago in respect to a controversial ongoing rape trial.

Good friend, Bernard-Henri Levi, published the comments on his web site over the weekend.

In his defense, the diminuitive auteur (Rosemary's Baby) argued that the case was unjust because of alleged discrepancies in the original court proceedings many moons ago.

In addition, Mr. Polaaski pointed an accusing finger at Steve Cooley in the Los Angeles DA's office.

Polanski alleges that Cooley's motives are not in sync with the official duties of his office (to seek Justice and uphold the Law) but rather, selfishly geared towards feathering his own nest.

The aging Lothario has accused Cooley of using his rape case to bolster his profile in the political arena - with the ultimate aim - of catapulting himself into higher office in the upcoming election.

"He needs media publicity," Polanski asserted for the record.

Well, I haven't reviewed all the court documents, so it would not be appropriate for me to comment on the alleged discrepancies in the lower court proceedings which transpired a couple of decades ago in Los Angeles.

However, from my own experience in recent weeks - and based on documentary evidence in my possesion under lock-and-key - Mr. Cooley and his staff have consistently ignored  State & Federal Statutes, engaged in intimidation tactics, attempted to extort monies from innocent ciizens, Violated Rights of Citizens, and participated in cover-ups and conspiracies with the ultimate aim of protecting their own selfish, dishonest, illegal interests.

I penned a post on these matters a few weeks ago as my readers may recall.

Post:  04/20/10

http://ijulian.blogspot.com/2010/04/stev-cooleystaff-in-district-attorneys.html

At that time, I fired off a written communication to Mr. Cooley by U.S. Post with a request that he respond to the allegations.

As of this date, the chicken-sh**  has not only failed to provide a defense, but hasn't even given me the courtesy of a reply.

Why?

Because the allegations are true!

Mr. Cooley, I am a taxpayer and a resident of this great Nation; therefore, I am entitled to a response.

You work for me, Sir.

And, the other voters of this fine city.

Did you forget that when you took office you took an oath to uphold the law and seek Justice for all?

Notwithstanding, because you drawa check from the public coffers, you are required to fulfill all the duties of office - including, but not limited to - answering the concerns of its residents.

Because you have been derelict in your duty, and egaged in disreputable illegal criminal conduct, I shall seek a formal investigation into the affairs of your office!

For the record, I can not support you in your bid for office in the next election.

And, I wholeheartedly urge voters, to oust you from the DA's office.

You're a dead-weight taken up valuable space.

Karl Kraus once opined:
"Corruption is worse than prostitution. The latter might endanger the morals of an individual, the former invariably endangers the morals of the entire country."




Tuesday, April 13, 2010

Sarah Palin...controversial perks! Lack of transparancy incenses officials...




 $5.00 a handshake
(Sarah, you did good)



Another controversy has reared its ugly head in the Palin camp!

When a couple of students stumbled on a proposed iternary for a potential  Sarah Palin speaking engagement in the trash - with a list of demands - Officials were incensed!

For starters, the particulars appeared to be a bit excessive in nature for a appearance on campus:

* 2 first class tickets
* Private jet policy
* Deluxe hotel suite
* Pre-screened questions


In addition, there was a stipulation that the facility provide bottled water with bendable straws.

The price tag (though not listed on the trash cast-offs) for the engagement?

$100,000.00 smackeroos!

But, what really irked the Officials was the lack of transparency.

That paperwork should have been recorded and filed and not just tossed in the garbage bin away from prying eyes.

Did Sarah Palin request that the terms and conditions be shrouded in mystery?

News at 11!

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

The View...Blagojevich wearing a rug?


When embattled Governor Rod Blagojevich appeared on a gab fest (The View) yesterday - to plead his case on the heels of a call for his impeachment - one of the ball*y dames jockeying for the limelight couldn't resist mussing up the politician's lustrous locks.

Contrary to what most viewers thought, though, Joy Behar was not hot-to-trot.

On the contrary!

Spies report that after she ran her fingers through Blagojevich's "do", she made a flippant quip behind his back.

"It's not a rug!"

Blagojevich is riding high in a swirl of controversy since his arrest last month on Federal corruption charges which allege that the colorful public figure tried to sell Obama's former Senate seat to the highest bidder.

In spite of the seriousness of impeachment hearings currently underway, the Governor chose not to appear before the Senate to defend his actions in a legal proceeding he has essentially labelled a "Kangaroo Court."

Notwithstanding, Blagojevich appears to have seen the writing on the wall, though.

When asked about his future in the wake of the scandal, he was inclined to wax politically.

"Well, I think it's not very promising right now."

Do 'ya think?

David Brin once said:

"It is said that power corrupts, but actually it's more true that power attracts the corruptible."


Friday, August 8, 2008

Los Angeles Superior Court...interest scam! Motorists' funds withheld...


Flower & coffee fund?




A few weeks ago I got a ticket.
Because the Police Officer was a bozo, I decided to contest the citation.

Unfortunately, even if a motorist chooses to argue the merits of a dismissal of a case, the court requires that the "defendant" post "bail" pending a determination by the Judge.

There are a couple of problems with that, in my estimation.

For starters - depending on how busy the court is - a hearing date may take weeks to place on calendar.

And, if a citizen requests an extension due to family problems or work commitments, the time frame may be extended a few weeks.

Meanwhile, the court holds onto the money. But, is it held in trust?

No, not in any manner of speaking.

In my instant case, once the ticket was dismissed, I was advised that my "bail" money would be returned within sixty days.

But, it was not until the eve of the due date, that a check finally arrived in the mail.

Then, I noticed something curious.

In spite of the fact the check was written two weeks earlier, the postmark reflected the court neglected - for some inexplicable reason - to mail it out until the day before I received it.

Notwithstanding, I was flabbergasted when I noticed that in spite of the fact the "bail" money was held in the court's bank account for a few months, no interest had been added to my draft.

Doesn't that sound dishonest and unethical?

While my paltry sum didn't amount to a lot of interest standing alone in an account, imagine how much interest would be generated on monies deposited on funds collected from thousands of motorists each month!

Is the interest accounted for? Are the funds declared?

And, more importantly, what does the court do with money?

I'll wager that Judge Parkin is behind the interest scam.

If you recall, Parkin is the Presiding Judge who got his hand caught in a slush fund at the courthouse a few years ago.

I suppose he's divvying up the ill-gotten gains among his corrupt cronies down at the courthouse.

Do 'ya think?

There outta be a law!





Monday, June 2, 2008

Profile of Presiding Judge Robert Parkin of Los Angeles Superior Court. A corrupt bench warmer!

Face of corrupt Judge Robert Parkin, Los Angeles Superior Court...


In recent years, you probably heard about a slush fund down at the Los Angeles Superior Court house that Judges allegedly dipped into.

Well, Presiding Judge Robert Parkin was right in the thick of it.

In response to the allegations, an Insight news article at the time reported,

"Former presiding Judge Robert Parkin tells Insight that an account critics dub a slush fund is nothing more than "coffee-and-flowers" cash for the Los Angeles Superior Court Judges Association (LASCJA). But documents obtained by Insight show the bank account served a great many purposes and that the Judges' association, a private organization, did not pay taxes on funds run through the account for the benefit of its members - who also would be subject to taxes."

The informative feature went on to note,

"On the face of it, there appear to have been one or several laws that may have been broken, but without specific information, it is impossible to know what statutes are applicable," says Beth Miller, a spokeswoman for California Secretary of State Bill Jones. At the federal level a spokesman for the IRS who declined to be named said that an act of this nature "may fall under 72.061 of the tax code fraud and false statements section."

"How much money is involved? Plenty. Just one of the LASCJA Bank of America account statements shows this alleged "coffee-and-flowers" fund with a balance of $110,000, according to copies secured by Insight."

For those of you who are in the dark, Judge Parkin was a former cop who maneuvered his way into the upper echelons of the Los Angeles Superior Court over the years by engaging in questionable self-serving tactics. In retrospect, the intelligent few have only to read between the lines to fathom how this disreputable bench-warmer carved such a corrupt niche for himself in the innermost corridors of the Los Angeles Superior Court system.

I've heard the various allegations about the dishonest actions of the man - the questionable favors that are whispered about and the old-boy network he stokes the fires for in the inner sanctum - which at times - have been difficult to pin down.

The man is elusive.

But, don't let the smiling congenial-looking face fool you.

In one clever ploy to damage the names of individuals, Judge Parkin allegedly permitted court actions to be filed against so-called defendants based on wild unsubstantiated (manufactured) evidence and languish in the court records for up to ten years without any service on the accused party.

Why?

So the enemies of the unwitting parties could secretly point to the court records whenever they chose to discredit the individuals without their knowledge.

As a matter of law a party in any action has a reasonable expectation that they be enlightened of any pending actions and that the court - likewise - allow a proper defense to which the parties are entitled pursuant to due process of Law.

Under Parkin's jurisdiction, all manner of basic rights are violated, to the detriment of the individual without due consideration from the Justice system.

I also have hard-core evidence that establishes that Judge Parkin not only has been willing to manipulate court documents to protect his precious reputation - but, also hide, and quite possibly - destroy legal papers in a deceitful and dishonest effort to not only quash any record of his own "ignorance" of the law but conceal the fact he may have discriminated against a litigant - and just maybe -taken a bribe.

For instance, years ago a young IN PRO PER litigant appeared before Judge Parkin on a legal issue in a case in which he was a plaintiff with a suit against a major corporation.

From the get-go, Judge Parkin not only proceeded to belittle the litigant when he attempted to argue sound legal issues before the Judge in open court - but stridently engaged in combative quips intended to not only provoke the individual - but insult simply because he was not represented by legal counsel.

Obviously, Judge Parkin obtained a law degree from the "Rinky-Dink" school of law.

After all, had he attended a reputable school, it may have been otherwise apparent to him that a litigant has a constitutional right to access to the courts in spite of the fact he or she may not be able to afford legal representation.

However, in this instant case, the litigant was a sly devil.

He remained calm and composed in spite of Parkin's insults and demeaning efforts to deter him from presenting his arguments in open court for the record.

In fact, the valiant IN PRO PER litigant struggled through the hearings "inspired" by the inner knowledge that the proceedings were not only being recorded but documenting the misconduct and grievous legal errors committed by Parkin which - ultimately - would end up on review in the Appellate Court.

And, that is exactly what transpired.

Of course, the litigant was not surprised when Judge Parkin denied all his "motions", and summarily dismissed the case. After all, the litigant was not as stupid as Judge Parkin.

Indeed, he saw that end scenario coming and prepared for it!

Needless to say, it came as quite a slap in the face to the Judge when the "opinion" of the Court of Appeal (2nd Appellate Court) was returned to Parkin's clerk.

Yup, the intelligent IN PRO PER litigant saw that ruling coming, too.

A reversal!

Then, something curious happened.

Whenever a party sought to secure a copy of the case file for review, the court clerks were unable to deliver it up from the Superior Court records, for some inexplicable reason.

In one computer database, Parkin alleged the file was in one location.

But, when the party queried the custodian in charge of the other database records, a second notation by Parkin asserted the case file was "elsewhere".

In fact, the file was not in either location as falsely alleged by Judge Parkin.

In retrospect, it is evident that Judge Parkin was so angered by the fact that his ruling was reversed by virtue of a legal argument presented in the Appellate Court by an IN PRO PER litigant (without a law degree mind you) that he chose to abscond with the documents to prevent them from ever seeing the light of day again.

In the final analysis, it was a deceitful and dishonest attempt to conceal his shocking reprehensible conduct in the lower court, and cover-up open discrimination he levelled at an IN PRO PER litigant whose rights he continually trampled on and violated.

Yeah, Parkin's a piece of work, alright.

Until he's removed from the bench - kicking and screaming (or in handcuffs) - the Los Angeles Superior Court will not only continue to be a corrupt legal entity - but likewise - shall remain a National joke and a disgrace to the Judiciary.

Sunday, May 25, 2008

A Profile of Judge Robert Beezer...Corrupt Judge of 9th Circuit Court of Appeals!


On occasion, a review of court documents reveals that a Judge presiding over a case not only failed to adjudicate an issue correctly, but made grievous error(s) which resulted in a gross violation of a party's Constitutional rights.

In addition, the facts may also signal a lack of integrity on the part of the Judge, which may have resulted in a corruption of the court.

Such is the case with Robert R. Beezer, a Senior Judge sitting on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals - who has demonstrated in one case that I know of - that he is not fit to "warm" the bench.

For example, in a case Beezer presided over a few years ago, a litigant appealed to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on several issues - one of which - was pertaining to a lower court ruling denying a right to proceed IN FORMA PAUPERIS (waiver of filing fees).

In respect to the fee waiver issue, Beezer incorrectly ruled that because the "Petition for Relief" was denied in the lower court, and the appellant subsequently paid the filing fees thereafter, that the issue was "moot" in the Appellate court.

On the contrary.

Judge Beezer not only established his ignorance of applicable statutes, but a shocking willingness to deceitfully ignore his duty to uphold Justice in a "Court of Law" and openly discriminate against an IN PRO PER litigant.

Notwithstanding, his grievous legal error caused considerable hardship to the litigant involved, for which he should be ashamed.

For example, in the lower court the litigant was entitled to a "waiver of fees", based on his low income. That right was protected by Statute.

When the court failed to issue a ruling, and serve him with notice, the litigant was forced to pay the fees out of his meager earnings to salvage his "case".

Just because the appellant paid the filing fee, did not make the issue "moot". In fact, it made it more grievous and ripe for legal issue.

In sum, the litigant was denied his right to a waiver of fees. Because of this, he was forced to use funds - that would normally be used to pay for food, rent, and the necessities of life - to pay court costs to which he was legally entitled a waiver.

Was Judge Beezer too stupid to figure this out, or was he demonstrating his distaste for disadvantaged litigants without the benefit of funds to secure legal counsel?

The fact the appellant paid the fees under great hardship - and "did without the necessities of life" to do so - does not negate the fact he was denied his legal right to a waiver of fees, nor does it make the issue "moot".

In sum, Judge Robert R. Beezer's ruling is a bunch of hokus-pokus bullsh**.

In fact, the erroneous ruling - in the public record and available for close scrutiny by the wise, the mighty, and the compassionate - calls attention to a man who has not only fallen from Grace, but - ultimately - "is a disgrace" to the Judiciary and in the eyes of the Lord.

As Martin Erdmann aptly put it,

Appellate Division judges [are] the whores who became madams.”