.:[Double Click To][Close]:.
Showing posts with label Breach of Public Trust. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Breach of Public Trust. Show all posts

Monday, December 28, 2009

Bank of the West...excessive feesl Rude insulting staff! Consumers in need ripped-off...




In recent months, the banks have belly-ached about being in financial straits, selfishly grabbed for hand-outs from the Government at the expense of the American tax-payer, then continued on their merry way with their excessive perks, disheartening disregard for financially-strapped account-holders, and shameless bold-faced ploys (which amount to embezzlement of funds) to pad their profit-margins by bilking millions of consumers out of their cold hard cash by virtue of excessive bank fees that border on the criminal.

"Bank of the West" is the worst offender when it comes to this kind of highway robbery!

The Bank (with no heart to speak of) is a greedy corporate giant manned by staff who are not only rude and insulting but totally devoid of any compassion or understanding.

In fact, their reprehensible conduct should never be tolerated in a civilized society.

For example, when a customer strode into a local branch to sort out excessive bank charges, the manager not only failed to lend a sympathetic ear to the account-holder (who had never questioned their fee structures in the past) but proceeded to talk down to the upset individual.

"You need to take responsibility for your finances and monitor your accounts regularly on the checking line," he pompously lashed out at the account-holder who sat there in total disbelief.

Rather than work with their client - whose financial obligations had always been met over the course of the past year when most struggled to do the same - the manager was inclined to smugly insult the client rather than budge a little and work in a cooperative spirit in respect to sorting out the excessive surcharges which were dinged on the account.

At one point, when the individual noted they intended to file a complaint with the President of the Bank, the manager relented a little and agreed to give a $35.00 credit back, but was adamant that he would not comply with the request to credit back two $35.00 fees (totalling $70.00).

When the miffed client noted he intended to file a complaint with the White House and request an investigation of excessive fees at Bank of the West, the manager tried to coerce the customer into foregoing on filing the complaint by subtly inferring he'd retaliate.

For instance, at this juncture, he pointedly asked (with a slightly-raised eyebrow) if the account-holder  wanted the $35.00 credit offered or not.

Since he had already promised the credit twice during the course of the ongoing conversation, clearly, he was subtly inferring that if the customer filed the complaint (as promised) he would not issue the $35.00 credit.

What low disgusting unprofessional conduct!

It was obvious to me, as I witnessed the events, that the Bank employee was a real snake!

When that attempt at coercion failed, he snottily responded from out of left field.

"The White House is already investigating bank fees."

So, there!

Talk about petty.

By the way, in addition to the illegal $35.00 fees imposed on the account, the bank began to charge the customer a $5.00 fee for an overdraft which occurred due to the charges they billed the account without legal notice or fair warning.

Is there no end to their larceny?

The Bank Manager's conduct persisted after that.

At the request of the account-holder, he scribbled down his name - but did so in an illegible script - so that it was difficult to determine the exact spelling of his last name.

In addition, he refused to locate the name and address of the President of Bank of the West.

Does this sound like the kind of conduct that an up-front bank employee engages in?

I think not!

Clearly, Mr. Howerton (?) at the Beverly Hills branch (9401 Wilshire) was keenly aware that his unprofessional mean-spirited conduct was highly irregular and inappropriate.

Subsequently, he was trying to hide his identity to avoid recrimination from his superiors (and prevent his true legal name from being posted on the Internet in this consumer alert).

In closing, it should also be noted that Bank of the West also engages in other deceptive and dishonest business behaviour.

On the customer service hotline, operators often promise credits to customers, which fail to materialzie in their actual bank account.

In retrospect, it's obvious that the promise is just a clever ploy to get disgruntled customers off the line, so they can move on to the next unhappy customer waiting with similar complaints of embezzelement, unethical banking procedures, violtations of the rights of bank customers, and so forth and so on.

At a time when Banks are failing, and their integrity is placed in doubt, Bank of the West is obviously one financial institution that should be avoided like the plague (even if they do entice you with a cheap teddy bear purchased at the 99 cent store to open an account).

After all, they'll simply raid the account (embezzle funds) until the customer gets fed up and closes the account in disgust.

Bank of the West, is more aptly titled, Bank of the Worst.

Those slimy worms at the Beverly Hills branch can take credit for the appropriate moniker folks!




Bank of West rip-offs U.S. account-holders!




Footnote
*Bank of the West is a subsidiary of BancWest Corporation
*BancWest is wholly owned by the French Universal Bank
*Yes, folks, the Frenchies are sticking it to the Yankees!

Sunday, October 12, 2008

Sarah Palin...Attorney argument about Ethics Law bullsh**. Todd Palin pursued personal vendetta at State expense...

I'm in like Flynn with the Governor...



In a post yesterday - after a ruling was issued from the State Legislative Council confirming that Governor Sarah Palin was "guilty" of an "Abuse of Power" - I warned that the deceitful Vice Presidential hopeful would be tossing a spin on the outcome to cast doubts on the probe into her reprehensible conduct.

True to form - Palin's attorneys released a statement over the weekend - wildly asserting that because the "State Ethics Statute" allegedly only refers to "financial" abuses, that Sarah Palin is not guilty of any abuse of power.

On the false premise that Sarah Palin was "not found" to have misused funds - or broken the public trust in that regard - her legal bozos are trying to effect damage control by arguing that the Legislative Council misinterpreted the Ethics Statute - and hence - their thorough findings have no merit.

On the contrary.

In their investigation, the investigators determined that Todd Palin used the Governor's office to carry out Sarah's personal vendetta against the disgruntled State Trooper.

For example, the 1st Dude (!) directed at least one secretary in the Governor's office to contact potential witnesses on the telephone, so that interviews could be set up in Sarah's office to carry out a probe he was heading up (!!!).

Then, on the heels of those overtures, Todd met with a handful of individuals in the Governor's office - at the State's expense - and commenced to interrogate the witnesses about the State Trooper's conduct, personnel record, and other matters his wife found offensive.

For starters - it should be noted from the get-go - that the Legislative authority determined that Todd's handling of those specific personal matters - in the environs of the Governor's office - was unethical and established an abuse of power.


In fact,witnesses noted (after-the-fact) that they not only felt Todd was seeking to "boost" his stature by using Sarah's office for the queries - but used the setting in a deceitful effort to force cooperation.

Understandably, the witnesses felt intimidated by Todd's continued use of the Governor's office during the Trooper probe, in view of the circumstances.

Notwithstanding the obvious, Palin's attorneys clearly have sh** for brains.

Before they opened their yaps, they should have considered the facts.

For instance, it has been established that Todd used Sarah's staff to make telephone calls and set up appointments.

Because the Governor's staff are paid a salary from the public coffers - in essence -Todd misused an "asset" of the State for Palin's own personal gain.

Further, I conjecture that Mr. Palin did not hold his meetings in the dark.

Doesn't the Governor's office get billed for the use of utilities?

I would hazard a guess that Todd also used stationary, pens, fax machines, and what-have-you.

Did he order up coffee and a snack for the "witnesses"?

According to reliable sources, Todd was in the Governor's office hours on end, conducting his man-hunt.

No doubt, he ate on occasion.

If he ordered take-out, who footed the bill?

Did he pay out of his own pocket - or simply sign a tab with a flourish of his cocky pen - so that the personal items would be summarily billed to the Governor's office?

Since there are phone records - and other logs available that track such matters - I expect that a fuller investigation would determine the width-and-breadth of Todd Palin's misuse of the "assets" of the Governor's office.

When it gets right down to it, the Palin's have no class.

It should be obvious to voters Sarah and Todd are white trailer trash.

Is that the element Americans want running the White House?


And, abusing connections to oust 'em when necessary...